UserVoice VS GitHub
Compare UserVoice VS GitHub and see what are their differences
Premium Customer Service Software to manage your customer support. Manage support email, publish self-help articles, and automate repetitive tasks.
featured
UserVoice
Canny.io
Freshdesk
Intercom
tawk.to
LiveAgent
UseResponse
Zendesk
GitHub
GitLab
BitBucket
VS Code
Git
Treehouse
Pantheon
CodePen
UserVoice GitHubUserVoice is recommended for medium to large-sized businesses, product managers, customer experience teams, and any organization looking to foster a more interactive relationship with their customer base to drive product improvements. It suits industries where customer feedback is a critical component of growth and innovation, such as technology, software development, and digital services.
Based on our record, GitHub seems to be a lot more popular than UserVoice. While we know about 2473 links to GitHub, we've tracked only 8 mentions of UserVoice. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I have sent them some user stories, complete with storyboard images. I am not a beta participant though. I suggested that it would be helpful if they rolled out something like UserVoice's Feedback Manager, so there is transparency to what's in the request queue and where we users can formally vote on the value of a given feature suggestion. Source: over 3 years ago
- Collecting customer's feature requests: This is a tough one, I am using https://uservoice.com/ but I don't like it that much. I am searching for a self-hosted alternative to https://canny.io/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
I think that RM should consider a solution such as UserVoice which will let the user community vote on what critical bug fixes or new features we feel are most important. Not only can a user upvote a feature request or critical fix, but they can also add comments to help substantiate their vote. Source: over 4 years ago
Six months later, UserVoice wanted to sign in with Courier and mentioned we lacked some functionalities they wanted. Specifically, they wanted to put two blocks next to each other in the notification designer. So, the sales and product team reached out to me, and I went, โOh yeah, I hacked that together; it was cool but with a few bugs.โ. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
Would having a proper Customer Feedback platform using something like Canny or UserVoice be useful? Source: almost 5 years ago
Is published at https://github.com/.keys so an SSH server to which you connect could do a reverse lookup. This is the reason why my ~/.ssh/config has those 2 lines at the end:- Source: Hacker News / 7 days agoHost *.
All of this assumes you can actually inspect what the agent did โ the real inputs after resolution, the real tool outputs, the real intermediate steps. That is the other half of the workflow. AgentLens captures the trace: every model and tool step, resolved inputs, raw outputs. agent-eval scores and gates the output; AgentLens gives you the unforgeable, agent-didn't-author trace data for Tier 1+2 to score against... - Source: dev.to / 8 days ago
# git: the API token, plus the credential used for the push Kubectl create secret generic foreman-github \ --from-literal=GITHUB_TOKEN="$GITHUB_TOKEN" -n foreman-system Kubectl create secret generic foreman-git-credentials \ --from-literal=token="$GITHUB_TOKEN" -n foreman-system Helm upgrade foreman llmkube/foreman -n foreman-system --reuse-values \ --set agent.githubToken.secretName=foreman-github \ ... - Source: dev.to / 8 days ago
This is why eval and observability ship as a unit, not as separate purchases. agent-eval scores and gates the output โ the tiers above, drift, hallucination. AgentLens captures the trace of how the agent got there: every model step and tool call, the resolved inputs, the raw outputs, the trajectory. Two things fall out of that:. - Source: dev.to / 18 days ago
The real fragility is in trying to constrain arguments. The docs are explicit that a pattern like Bash(curl http://github.com/ *) fails to do what it looks like it does. It won't match curl -X GET http://github.com/... (option before the URL), curl https://github.com/... (different protocol), curl -L http://bit.ly/xyz (redirects to GitHub), URL=http://github.com && curl $URL (variable), or curl http://github.com... - Source: dev.to / 19 days ago
Canny.io - Canny helps you collect and organize feature requests to better understand customer needs and prioritize your roadmap.
GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab
Freshdesk - Freshdesk is a cloud-based customer support software that lets you support customers through traditional channels like phone and email, social channels like Facebook and Twitter, and your own branded community
BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.
Intercom - Intercom is a customer relationship management and messaging tool for web businesses. Build relationships with users to create loyal customers.
VS Code - Build and debug modern web and cloud applications, by Microsoft