A startup from San Francisco, the United States that is founded by Chris Wanstrath.
collaboration
GitHub provides a platform for multiple developers to work on the same project concurrently, facilitating collaboration through features like pull requests, code reviews, and issues tracking.
integration
GitHub integrates seamlessly with various third-party tools and services, such as CI/CD pipelines, project management tools, and many development environments, enhancing productivity and workflow efficiency.
version_control
Utilizes Git for version control, allowing users to track changes, revert to previous versions if necessary, and manage different branches of development, ensuring code stability and history tracking.
community
With millions of developers and a vast repository of open-source projects, GitHub fosters a robust community where users can contribute to projects, seek help, share knowledge, and collaborate broadly.
availability
GitHub is a cloud-based platform, which means that projects are accessible from anywhere with an internet connection, providing flexibility and convenience to developers globally.
documentation
GitHub allows for comprehensive project documentation through README files, wikis, and GitHub Pages, making it easier for users to understand project context and contribute effectively.
Promote GitHub. You can add any of these badges on your website.
GitHub is considered an excellent choice for developers and teams looking for a reliable and efficient platform for version control and collaboration. Its community support, extensive documentation, and innovative features make it a preferred choice in the software development community.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if GitHub is good.
Check the traffic stats of GitHub on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of GitHub on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of GitHub's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of GitHub on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about GitHub on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Is published at https://github.com/.keys so an SSH server to which you connect could do a reverse lookup. This is the reason why my ~/.ssh/config has those 2 lines at the end:- Source: Hacker News / 3 days agoHost *.
All of this assumes you can actually inspect what the agent did โ the real inputs after resolution, the real tool outputs, the real intermediate steps. That is the other half of the workflow. AgentLens captures the trace: every model and tool step, resolved inputs, raw outputs. agent-eval scores and gates the output; AgentLens gives you the unforgeable, agent-didn't-author trace data for Tier 1+2 to score against... - Source: dev.to / 4 days ago
# git: the API token, plus the credential used for the push Kubectl create secret generic foreman-github \ --from-literal=GITHUB_TOKEN="$GITHUB_TOKEN" -n foreman-system Kubectl create secret generic foreman-git-credentials \ --from-literal=token="$GITHUB_TOKEN" -n foreman-system Helm upgrade foreman llmkube/foreman -n foreman-system --reuse-values \ --set agent.githubToken.secretName=foreman-github \ ... - Source: dev.to / 4 days ago
This is why eval and observability ship as a unit, not as separate purchases. agent-eval scores and gates the output โ the tiers above, drift, hallucination. AgentLens captures the trace of how the agent got there: every model step and tool call, the resolved inputs, the raw outputs, the trajectory. Two things fall out of that:. - Source: dev.to / 14 days ago
The real fragility is in trying to constrain arguments. The docs are explicit that a pattern like Bash(curl http://github.com/ *) fails to do what it looks like it does. It won't match curl -X GET http://github.com/... (option before the URL), curl https://github.com/... (different protocol), curl -L http://bit.ly/xyz (redirects to GitHub), URL=http://github.com && curl $URL (variable), or curl http://github.com... - Source: dev.to / 15 days ago
Fallback chains โ og:title โ twitter:title โ- SSRF protection โ if you fetch user-supplied URLs, you MUST block
localhost, RFC-1918 ranges, and internal hostnames, or your preview endpoint is a proxy into your own infrastructure- Caching โ you do not want to re-fetch a URL on every render
- Rate limiting โ a public...
- Source: dev.to / 17 days ago
$ git pull Remote: Repository not found. Fatal: repository 'https://github.com//.git/' not found. - Source: dev.to / 18 days ago
// ==UserScript== // @name GitHub -> Obsidian Task // @namespace obsidian // @version 1.0 // @match https://github.com/*/*/issues/* // @match https://github.com/*/*/pull/* // @grant GM_setClipboard // ==/UserScript== (function () { 'use strict'; function getTitle() { return document.querySelector("bdi")?.textContent.trim(); } function copyTask() { ... - Source: dev.to / 21 days ago
Import requests From bs4 import BeautifulSoup From datetime import datetime Def fetch_github_trending(): url = "https://github.com/trending?since=daily" response = requests.get(url) soup = BeautifulSoup(response.text, 'html.parser') repos = [] for article in soup.select('article.Box-row'): repo_link = article.select_one('h2 a')['href'] stars_today =... - Source: dev.to / 22 days ago
Git clone https://github.com//.git /opt/app Cd /opt/app Docker build -t app . Docker run -d --name app --restart unless-stopped -p 8080:8080 app. - Source: dev.to / 25 days ago
The core of the ecosystem is the official open-source server hosted on GitHub. It is written in TypeScript and implements the full MCP specification. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
This is why the gate needs a trace it can trust, and why AgentLens is the other half of this workflow. agent-eval scores and gates the output; AgentLens captures the trace of how the agent got there โ every model call and tool step, the resolved inputs (not the templated ones), the raw outputs. That trace is exactly the unforgeable, agent-didn't-author substrate that Tier 1+2 need to score against. Without it,... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
## Tell Git to start tracking your project Git init ## Take a snapshot of all your current files Git add . ## Save this snapshot with a description Git commit -m "Initial commit from AI tool" ## Connect your local project to GitHub ## Get repository URL from your GitHub page ## it looks like https://github.com/your-name/your-repo.git Git remote add origin PASTE_YOUR_URL_HERE ## Upload your code to GitHub Git... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
Conclusion Next time Git insists a private repository doesn't exist, skip editing your config file and head straight to the Windows Credential Manager. Wiping out the stale git:https://github.com entry forces a clean handshake, getting you back to coding in less than a minute. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
Gitea is where all private repositories live: infra configs, personal projects, anything I don't want on a third-party server. Public projects still go to GitHub because that's where the audience is, but a number of those GitHub repositories are mirrored back to Gitea as a local backup. The split is simple: Gitea for control and resilience, GitHub for reach. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
The OpenClaw AI Agent framework is genuinely powerful. It supports:. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
This is the philosophy behind the tooling I work on: agent-eval for turning those traces into pass/fail verdicts in CI, and AgentLens for keeping the same traces searchable once the agent is live in production. Whether you adopt those or roll your own, the principle holds โ your agent's behavior lives in the steps, so that is what you have to capture. Log the decisions, not the function calls. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
When you're ready to build the regression suite, agent-eval gives you the tiered deterministic + judge harness so prompt changes stop being vibes-based, and AgentLens gives you the structured traces so a 3 a.m. Failure is a query instead of an excavation. Wire those in before the demo gets a roadmap, not after it gets rolled back. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
# Login manually (opens browser for you) Browser-cli login https://github.com # Later, reuse the saved state Browser-cli --state ./github-state.json navigate https://github.com/settings. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
# Scan every branch for the payload (see section 3). # Evidence backup once, as a bare clone (no working tree, nothing runs): Git clone --mirror https://github.com//.git evidence.git Tar czf evidence.tar.gz evidence.git # Work clone with no checkout: Git clone --no-checkout https://github.com//.git fix Cd fix # For each infected branch, confirm the malicious commit is the tip, then # reset the branch to its... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
First, an account. It is free at github.com, and that is the entire barrier to entry. No invitation, no wait time, no portfolio, no minimum experience. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
GitHub remains an industry-leading platform in software development, renowned for its robust code collaboration and version control systems. Dominating the landscape as both a repository and a community hub, GitHub is widely acclaimed for enabling developers to work together on open-source and proprietary software projects. It offers an extensive suite of features such as continuous integration via GitHub Actions, comprehensive API integrations, project management tools, and security enhancements with Dependabot, all of which are vital to modern-day DevOps practices.
Recent discussions around GitHub in various articles and forums highlight some notable public opinions. Positively, GitHub is praised for its adaptability and integration capabilities, pairing seamlessly with tools like Trello, Jira, and many CI/CD pipelines. These integrations make it a go-to choice for developers and operations teams striving for efficiency in their workflows. Moreover, GitHub Discussions has been commended for fostering transparent and accessible community interactions, thus enhancing collaborative problem-solving and innovation within development communities.
On the other hand, GitHub does face criticism and challenges that influence public perception. Some developers express concerns over perceived limitations in its pricing model and report issues of API sluggishness. Additionally, geopolitical barriers have hindered GitHub's universal accessibility, raising concerns for developers whose work is impacted by government-imposed restrictions. These factors contribute to a conversation about seeking alternatives, despite GitHub's robust offerings.
Security is another recurring theme. With GitHub's transition to Microsoft ownership, there is ongoing dialogue concerning the implications for open-source projects and community governance. While some users are wary about Microsoftโs influence, others appreciate the enhanced security features and investment in open-source initiatives.
In terms of competition, GitHub faces substantial rivalry from platforms like GitLab, BitBucket, and even non-repository-specific environments like VS Code and Replit. Each offers unique advantages, and the availability of self-hosted and free alternatives further encourages software teams to weigh the costs and benefits of various platforms.
Personal user accounts of GitHub indicate a balance between professional necessity and strategic choice. While many opt for GitHub due to its expansive ecosystem and industry dominance, there's a permeating desire for diversification. Articles continue to promote exploring alternative platforms, ensuring that GitHub remains peerless not due to scarcity of options, but due to its intrinsic value proposition.
In summary, GitHub continues to be a cornerstone of the software development ecosystem, providing essential tools and community resources. However, a consideration of its criticisms and competitive landscape is crucial for developers aiming to optimize their version control and collaboration strategies in an ever-evolving field.
Do you know an article comparing GitHub to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is GitHub good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss GitHub here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
Exceptional platform for developers and collaborators.
Best place for collabaroting for developers
I think there is no comments needed