Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.
A startup from San Francisco, the United States that is founded by Chris Wanstrath.
This page is designed to help you find out whether GitHub is good and if it is the right choice for you.
Listed in
collaboration
GitHub provides a platform for multiple developers to work on the same project concurrently, facilitating collaboration through features like pull requests, code reviews, and issues tracking.
integration
GitHub integrates seamlessly with various third-party tools and services, such as CI/CD pipelines, project management tools, and many development environments, enhancing productivity and workflow efficiency.
version_control
Utilizes Git for version control, allowing users to track changes, revert to previous versions if necessary, and manage different branches of development, ensuring code stability and history tracking.
community
With millions of developers and a vast repository of open-source projects, GitHub fosters a robust community where users can contribute to projects, seek help, share knowledge, and collaborate broadly.
availability
GitHub is a cloud-based platform, which means that projects are accessible from anywhere with an internet connection, providing flexibility and convenience to developers globally.
documentation
GitHub allows for comprehensive project documentation through README files, wikis, and GitHub Pages, making it easier for users to understand project context and contribute effectively.
Promote GitHub. You can add any of these badges on your website.
GitHub is an essential platform for modern software development. It makes it easy to host, manage, and collaborate on code while providing powerful tools for version control, project management, and team collaboration. Its large open-source community is another major strength, offering developers access to countless projects, resources, and opportunities to learn. Overall, GitHub is a reliable and professional platform that has become a fundamental part of the developer ecosystem.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if GitHub is good.
Check the traffic stats of GitHub on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of GitHub on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of GitHub's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of GitHub on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about GitHub on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
For developers who cannot access Fable 5, Claude Opus 4.8 offers the best alternative. Integrating this model into your daily workflow is straightforward, especially when using modern development platforms like GitHub for repository management. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
1228 push attempts died with fatal: could not read Username for 'https://github.com' — an https remote with no credential helper and no stored Credentials. First one 2026-07-21T20:48:03Z, still failing as I write this. Thirty-nine Days. - Source: dev.to / 28 days ago
They can include the protocol, it’s that regardless of what’s put in there it’ll use https, which is explained with examples both in the following sentences and then in more detail in a linked doc. > For repositories on GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, a specifier now names a repository rather than choosing a transport. github:owner/repo, owner/repo, git+https://…, and git+ssh://git@… all resolve through the host's... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
First things first, and this case, we had to understand what git and git hub really is. From the lesson, Git is basically a version control systems installed on the computer that tracks changes made within a project. On the other hand, git hub refers to an online platform allowing users to store their git repositories and this could be easily accessed through [https://github.com/]. Apart from just storing... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
[credential] useHttpPath = true [credential "https://github.com/"] helper = helper = "!f() { \ [ \"$1\" = get ] || exit 0; \ account=''; \ while IFS='=' read -r k v; do \ [ \"$k\" = path ] && account=${v%%/*}; \ done; \ [ -n \"$account\" ] || exit 0; \ token=$(gh auth token --user \"$account\") || exit 0; \ printf... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
This has now created our repository. This repository contains a link which we can share to other users, and this is the link that we need to link our local folder with the newly created repository. To do this, simply access it once you scroll down in the page you are in the simply copy the http link. This is what we shall use. The link usually looks like this http://github.com//. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
GitHub is an online service where we can store Git repositories. While Git is installed and works locally on our personal computers, GitHub stores our repositories online and allows us to share and collaborate on projects. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
What I'd do differently Start with PyPI from day 1. I spent the first week telling people to pip install git+https://github.com/.... The friction was enormous. Once I published to PyPI, installation became pip install infra-lang — 5 seconds instead of a paragraph of instructions. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
"""Clones a single branch of a GitHub repository into a temporary directory for local scanning.""" Import logging Import shutil Import subprocess Import tempfile Logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) Class RepoFetchError(RuntimeError): """Raised when the target repository/branch cannot be cloned.""" Class RepoFetcher: """Shallow-clones a single branch of a repository so its tests can be scanned... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
# video-meta.yml Topic: > Walking through how we cut cold-start time on a Lambda-backed GraphQL API from 2.4s to under 400ms, including the two things that didn't work. Target_keyword: lambda cold start optimization Audience: backend devs who already ship serverless, not beginners Model_channels: - the three channels currently ranking for this keyword Links: repo: https://github.com/... slides:... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Import struct, json, urllib.request REL = "https://github.com/{owner}/{repo}/releases/download/{tag}/" PART = ["...part1.zip.001", "...part2.zip.002", "...part3.zip.003"] SIZE = [1992294400, 1992294400, 1893639808] # from the releases API Def grab(part, start, end, out): # HTTP range fetch req = urllib.request.Request(REL + PART[part], Headers={"Range":... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Is published at https://github.com/.keys so an SSH server to which you connect could do a reverse lookup. This is the reason why my ~/.ssh/config has those 2 lines at the end:- Source: Hacker News / about 2 months agoHost *.
All of this assumes you can actually inspect what the agent did — the real inputs after resolution, the real tool outputs, the real intermediate steps. That is the other half of the workflow. AgentLens captures the trace: every model and tool step, resolved inputs, raw outputs. agent-eval scores and gates the output; AgentLens gives you the unforgeable, agent-didn't-author trace data for Tier 1+2 to score against... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
# git: the API token, plus the credential used for the push Kubectl create secret generic foreman-github \ --from-literal=GITHUB_TOKEN="$GITHUB_TOKEN" -n foreman-system Kubectl create secret generic foreman-git-credentials \ --from-literal=token="$GITHUB_TOKEN" -n foreman-system Helm upgrade foreman llmkube/foreman -n foreman-system --reuse-values \ --set agent.githubToken.secretName=foreman-github \ ... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
This is why eval and observability ship as a unit, not as separate purchases. agent-eval scores and gates the output — the tiers above, drift, hallucination. AgentLens captures the trace of how the agent got there: every model step and tool call, the resolved inputs, the raw outputs, the trajectory. Two things fall out of that:. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
The real fragility is in trying to constrain arguments. The docs are explicit that a pattern like Bash(curl http://github.com/ *) fails to do what it looks like it does. It won't match curl -X GET http://github.com/... (option before the URL), curl https://github.com/... (different protocol), curl -L http://bit.ly/xyz (redirects to GitHub), URL=http://github.com && curl $URL (variable), or curl http://github.com... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Fallback chains — og:title → twitter:title →- SSRF protection — if you fetch user-supplied URLs, you MUST block
localhost, RFC-1918 ranges, and internal hostnames, or your preview endpoint is a proxy into your own infrastructure- Caching — you do not want to re-fetch a URL on every render
- Rate limiting — a public...
- Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
$ git pull Remote: Repository not found. Fatal: repository 'https://github.com//.git/' not found. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
// ==UserScript== // @name GitHub -> Obsidian Task // @namespace obsidian // @version 1.0 // @match https://github.com/*/*/issues/* // @match https://github.com/*/*/pull/* // @grant GM_setClipboard // ==/UserScript== (function () { 'use strict'; function getTitle() { return document.querySelector("bdi")?.textContent.trim(); } function copyTask() { ... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Import requests From bs4 import BeautifulSoup From datetime import datetime Def fetch_github_trending(): url = "https://github.com/trending?since=daily" response = requests.get(url) soup = BeautifulSoup(response.text, 'html.parser') repos = [] for article in soup.select('article.Box-row'): repo_link = article.select_one('h2 a')['href'] stars_today =... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Git clone https://github.com//.git /opt/app Cd /opt/app Docker build -t app . Docker run -d --name app --restart unless-stopped -p 8080:8080 app. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
GitHub remains an industry-leading platform in software development, renowned for its robust code collaboration and version control systems. Dominating the landscape as both a repository and a community hub, GitHub is widely acclaimed for enabling developers to work together on open-source and proprietary software projects. It offers an extensive suite of features such as continuous integration via GitHub Actions, comprehensive API integrations, project management tools, and security enhancements with Dependabot, all of which are vital to modern-day DevOps practices.
Recent discussions around GitHub in various articles and forums highlight some notable public opinions. Positively, GitHub is praised for its adaptability and integration capabilities, pairing seamlessly with tools like Trello, Jira, and many CI/CD pipelines. These integrations make it a go-to choice for developers and operations teams striving for efficiency in their workflows. Moreover, GitHub Discussions has been commended for fostering transparent and accessible community interactions, thus enhancing collaborative problem-solving and innovation within development communities.
On the other hand, GitHub does face criticism and challenges that influence public perception. Some developers express concerns over perceived limitations in its pricing model and report issues of API sluggishness. Additionally, geopolitical barriers have hindered GitHub's universal accessibility, raising concerns for developers whose work is impacted by government-imposed restrictions. These factors contribute to a conversation about seeking alternatives, despite GitHub's robust offerings.
Security is another recurring theme. With GitHub's transition to Microsoft ownership, there is ongoing dialogue concerning the implications for open-source projects and community governance. While some users are wary about Microsoft’s influence, others appreciate the enhanced security features and investment in open-source initiatives.
In terms of competition, GitHub faces substantial rivalry from platforms like GitLab, BitBucket, and even non-repository-specific environments like VS Code and Replit. Each offers unique advantages, and the availability of self-hosted and free alternatives further encourages software teams to weigh the costs and benefits of various platforms.
Personal user accounts of GitHub indicate a balance between professional necessity and strategic choice. While many opt for GitHub due to its expansive ecosystem and industry dominance, there's a permeating desire for diversification. Articles continue to promote exploring alternative platforms, ensuring that GitHub remains peerless not due to scarcity of options, but due to its intrinsic value proposition.
In summary, GitHub continues to be a cornerstone of the software development ecosystem, providing essential tools and community resources. However, a consideration of its criticisms and competitive landscape is crucial for developers aiming to optimize their version control and collaboration strategies in an ever-evolving field.
Do you know an article comparing GitHub to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is GitHub good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss GitHub here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
Its the best in terms of repository management but build minutes are very expensive for private repositories.
💻 GitHub is the undisputed home of software development. The collaborative workflow—from branching and pull requests to inline code reviews—is completely seamless. It’s not just a place to host repositories; it’s where teams actually build, debate, and ship code together. If you are doing any kind of collaborative coding, GitHub remains the absolute gold standard. 🌍✨.
GitHub is more than a code repository ,it's one of the best places to collaborate, contribute to open-source projects, showcase your work, and learn from developers around the world.
Basic in all developments.
Exceptional platform for developers and collaborators.
Best place for collabaroting for developers
I think there is no comments needed