Pipedrive Reviews

1. michelleturner

   · Managing Director at Nuvoro Digital · 11 months ago
   Pipedrive is sales focused and easy to use

   We adopted Pipedrive for our sales team because we were looking for a CRM that was sales focused and didn't come with all the other unnecessary features and complexity of other solutions. We have been very happy with Pipedrive and our sales team consistently have good things to say about it. More importantly though our sales team do actually add and update the data which had been a problem with our previous CRM which was too complex and cumbersome to get regular useage. The reporting functionality is good too and I can get a clear view on deals and where they are up to.

   🏁 Competitors: HubSpot CRM, Salesforce Sales Cloud, Zoho CRM

   👍 Pros:    Easy to use|Sales first approach|Good reporting options

   👎 Cons:    Mainly self-service support
2. Pieter Jan

   · Co-founder at Vizito · about 4 years ago
   The best CRM for our SaaS business

   Pipedrive has made our business much more efficient in following up deals. Keep track of deals, meetings, mails and phone calls all in one place. We can quickly follow up on offers and used Pipedrive's automations and API to integrate our Vizito trials directly into Pipedrive.

   It offers the most flexibility while maintaining an easy-to-use interface and their support is superb!

   Keep up the great work!

   🏁 Competitors: HubSpot CRM, Teamleader

   👍 Pros:    Easy to use|Quick and easy|Stable|Easy integration|Api integration|Rest api|Cost-efficient
3. jeet998

   · Chief Manager at Entab Infotech Pvt Ltd · over 6 years ago
   Best CRM Software: PipeDrive

   All alternatives are good but we prefer Pipedrive because of its great customization and most fit for company/business development.

4dev.com Reviews

1. Harry Ethan

   · SMO · 21 days ago

   We needed a way to manage contractor payments and documentation without drowning in compliance questions every month.

   Our team is spread across eight countries, and the old process took too much time. Now contractors self-onboard, KYC runs automatically, invoices generate themselves, and payouts move much faster than before. That alone removed a lot of back and forth.

   Pricing is fair and usage-based, which also helps when team volume changes. The interface took one cycle to learn, but daily use is smooth now.

2. William

   · SMO · about 2 months ago
   A strong fit for contractor-focused startups and great Deel alternative

   Onboarding was straightforward, the legal setup was much easier to manage than our previous process, and payouts have been consistently on time for us. It does a focused job, but it does that job very well.

   👍 Pros:    If you mainly hire independent contractors and do not need a large hr suite built around full-time employee benefits, 4dev can be a much better fit. for our contractor-only setup, the billing model was simple: a transaction-based fee, with no subscription costs for empty seats. the invoice generation and exports were also structured well enough to save our finance team a lot of time during our last audit review.

   👎 Cons:    It does not offer full-scale eor features for permanent local employees. if you need to manage local health insurance, pensions, or similar employee-benefit workflows, this probably is not the right tool.
3. Jean Bernard

   3 months ago
   Switched mid-audit and did not regret it

   I spent most of those 48h reformatting spreadsheets and writing an explanatory email about why three different payment methods showed up in the same period.

   We moved to 4dev two months after that. When the same investor came back with a follow-up data request eight months later, I exported everything in about twelve minutes. No explanatory emails attached. Same documentation standard across all contractors, all countries, and the whole period.

   Overall: It solved the exact problem we had. Honestly, we should have moved sooner.

   👍 Pros:    Our series a investor once asked for a full payroll export covering 6 months - with just 48h notice. at that point, we were running a mix of wire transfers, wise, and one contractor was getting paid via paypal because his bank situation was complicated. not ideal, right?

   👎 Cons:    If you have a multi-level approval workflow, the role settings may feel a bit limiting. we adjusted our internal process around it — it works, just not as elegantly as i’d like.

Pipedrive mentions (2)

• Why doesn't Microsoft have a better CRM product...?

  I feel like Microsoft could offer a more robust CRM than what's present with 'Contacts' under Outlook, and pretty easily. Something like Pipedrive... I mean it could syncronize all the datapoints that local Microsoft programs already have access to: mail, contacts, projects, teams, and LinkedIn. Source: almost 4 years ago

• Building Reach in Public

  Pipedrive → our CRM for tracking leads, tasks, conversations, and deals. We chose Pipedrive because it does a good job of providing an intuitive and relatively simple CRM while still having enough features to track our sales conversations. Pricing is accessible. Source: over 4 years ago

4dev.com mentions (1)

• How to pay international contractors in 2026: contracts, taxes, invoices, and payment tools

  4dev.com positions itself around contractor operations worldwide, with workflows, documentation, compliance support, and contractor administration across 150+ countries (4dev.com). - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago