Software Alternatives & Reviews

Qudos VS Web.dev by Google

Compare Qudos VS Web.dev by Google and see what are their differences


Product Hunt for dev tools

Learn how to build for the web and see where you stand 🌟
Not present
Web.dev by Google Landing Page
Web.dev by Google Landing Page

Qudos details

Categories
Developer Tools Productivity Tech
Website qudos.io  

Web.dev by Google details

Categories
Online Services Tool SEO Tools
Website web.dev  

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Qudos and Web.dev by Google)
100
100%
0%
0
4
4%
96%
96
100
100%
0%
0
0
0%
100%
100

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Web.dev by Google seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 55 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on Reddit, HackerNews and some other platforms. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Qudos mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Qudos yet. Tracking of Qudos recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Web.dev by Google mentions (55)

  • Any good books for catching up on new CSS features (since, say, 2017)?
    I know the material is out there on MDN and web.dev, but I'm looking for a curated resource that I can read back-to-front to get caught up. - Source: Reddit / 1 day ago
  • Heard about web.dev from Google?
    Never saw this before until I stumbled upon it in Google Developers Products. As seen in the image, The bottom right one should take you to web.dev. - Source: dev.to / 2 days ago
  • Does google lighthouse does anything?
    Did you? Also web.dev is ran by Google, whatever performance output you get from it is the closest thing to how Google will rank your site for speed. Locally testing your performance is a shot in the dark as it can be influenced by Network Speed, hardware and who knows what else. - Source: Reddit / 6 days ago
  • Ask HN: What are you using for public documentation these days?
    As I read through these comments (and discover some interesting tools!) I want to give a word of caution for anyone using this thread to make a tooling choice. The "best" documentation system for you is heavily dependent on your product [1], your contributors [2], and your ability to maintain/customize the underlying tooling. Just because you're seeing Tool X 10 times in this comment doesn't necessarily mean it's... - Source: Hacker News / 16 days ago
  • Ask HN: What are you using for public documentation these days?
    Background: I've been a technical writer for 9 years. 6 at Google, 3 as the only writer at an IoT startup. I helped Corrily with their docs [1] in August. They were interested in readme.io. I wasn't keen on it because I had worked with Retool a few years back and had found readme.io lacking. But I was pleasantly surprised by how much readme.io has progressed since then! If you're looking for a documentation... - Source: Hacker News / 16 days ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Qudos and Web.dev by Google, you can also consider the following products

Codefield - Tools for developers, designers and photographers

cutestat - Website Stats and Valuation. CuteStat.

Random User Generator - Like Lorem Ipsum, but for people.

WebsiteOutlook - WebsiteOutlook is an all-in-one website that provides you detailed information on famous websites based on various data sources like traffic, page rank, and estimated ad revenue.

Chrome Developer Tool - Develop and Debug Chrome Apps & Extensions. By Google

Rankchart - Rankchart is one of the unique websites that allows you to examine your websites or watch competitors and locate rich information about website technologies, site reputation, errors, SEO, and ad-word recommendations.

User reviews

Share your experience with using Qudos and Web.dev by Google. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Post a review