opencode Reviews

UserVoice Reviews

opencode mentions (71)

• GLM-5.3: Frontier Coding with Emergent Cyber Capabilities

  What the person above is suggesting: * https://pi.dev/ * https://omp.sh/ Personally I also think that OpenCode is nice, their CLI version is enjoyable and their desktop/web version is mostly okay: * https://opencode.ai/. - Source: Hacker News / about 20 hours ago

• Trying Bifrost: An AI Gateway That Simplified My Setup

  I wired it into OpenCode, an open-source coding harness similar to Claude Code and Codex. I'm using an OpenCode Zen key and a Gemini key, and together, these give me access to multiple SOTA models for free, without touching a separate dashboard for each provider. - Source: dev.to / 11 days ago

• 🌱 OpenSpec Is Built for Brownfield. I Used It to Build From Nothing.

  I drove it from my coding-agent with a handful of commands. - Source: dev.to / 13 days ago

• Grammar.lol: open-source Grammarly using existing ChatGPT or Grok Subscription

  Https://pi.dev/docs/latest/providers#openai-codex is specific that it "Requires ChatGPT Plus or Pro subscription". https://opencode.ai are also both specific that it's for "Plus/Pro" subscriptions. Is there some link where you saw free tier Codex use in non-official apps is allowed by OpenAI? (I have used the free tier in the official Codex app, but as you said, labs can have different rules for official vs... - Source: Hacker News / 17 days ago

• ZCode: Claude Code from the Makers of GLM

  Https://opencode.ai/ OpenCode was the first agent harness I used, and I have always like it. You can configure a wide variety of providers, but it's open source and has a number of core contributors. The other opinionated option is Pi (the Pi agent harness). This is a great lightweight option and also supports a number of providers. You can also use local model servers. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

UserVoice mentions (8)

• YARWL (Yet Another Remarkable Wishlist)

  I have sent them some user stories, complete with storyboard images. I am not a beta participant though. I suggested that it would be helpful if they rolled out something like UserVoice's Feedback Manager, so there is transparency to what's in the request queue and where we users can formally vote on the value of a given feature suggestion. Source: over 3 years ago

• Ask HN: Could you please share which SaaS you are using for your SaaS?

  - Collecting customer's feature requests: This is a tough one, I am using https://uservoice.com/ but I don't like it that much. I am searching for a self-hosted alternative to https://canny.io/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago

• "Help us to improve your reMarkable experience"

  I think that RM should consider a solution such as UserVoice which will let the user community vote on what critical bug fixes or new features we feel are most important. Not only can a user upvote a feature request or critical fix, but they can also add comments to help substantiate their vote. Source: over 4 years ago

• How We Use Internal Hackathons to Create New Product Features

  Six months later, UserVoice wanted to sign in with Courier and mentioned we lacked some functionalities they wanted. Specifically, they wanted to put two blocks next to each other in the notification designer. So, the sales and product team reached out to me, and I went, “Oh yeah, I hacked that together; it was cool but with a few bugs.”. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

• Move features requests from Reddit?

  Would having a proper Customer Feedback platform using something like Canny or UserVoice be useful? Source: almost 5 years ago