Software Alternatives & Startups

Keeping VS Commit Together by Github

Compare Keeping VS Commit Together by Github and see what are their differences

Keeping

Turns Google Workspace Into Your Team’s Help Desk

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Paid Free trial
Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits

Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Commit Together by Github seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 1
Customer Support popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
89 vs 68

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Keeping
Commit Together by Github
Website keeping.com github.blog
Pricing
Paid Free trial Official pricing
—
Company Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2020 —
Listed in

About Keeping and Commit Together by Github

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Keeping
Commit Together by Github

Keeping is a shared inbox and helpdesk tool that lives inside Gmail, turning a shared mailbox like support@company(dot)com into a collaborative workspace where customer emails become trackable tickets with assignments, statuses, tags, and collision detection. It adds helpdesk power (templates,...

Read more about Keeping

No description of Commit Together by Github yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Keeping 6 features
Commit Together by Github 4 features
  • Shared Inbox
    Collaborate on your shared inbox from Gmail
  • Automated Workflows
    Tag, assign, and process email automatically
  • Lives in Gmail
    No extra tabs or apps to learn
  • Unlimited Mailboxes
    Add as many shared mailboxes as you like for free
  • Powerful Analytics
    Track first response time, volume, and measure your team
  • Collision Detection
    Never answer the same email twice
  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Keeping 2 videos + Add
Commit Together by Github 0 videos + Add

DROP 2025 REVIEW | Keeping the Shot INTERESTING!

More videos

  • - I hate it, I'm keeping it. SMSL PL200T CD transport review.

No Commit Together by Github videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Keeping
Commit Together by Github
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
47% 47%
53% 53%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Keeping and Commit Together by Github.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Keeping's answer

Small and medium sized businesses

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Keeping's answer

Built in GCP (Google Cloud), with React, Elixir, and Phoenix.

What's the story behind your product?

Keeping's answer

Keeping was built to help teams manage customer support without leaving Gmail. It brings the structure of a help desk to shared inboxes, making it easier to assign, track, and respond to customer emails as a team.

User comments

Share your experience with using Keeping and Commit Together by Github. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Keeping no reviews yet
Commit Together by Github no reviews yet

We have no reviews of Commit Together by Github yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Keeping 0 mentions
Commit Together by Github 1 mention

Tracking Keeping since Mar 2021.

  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago

Alternatives to Keeping and Commit Together by Github

When comparing Keeping and Commit Together by Github, you can also consider the following products.