Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Gogs VS Commit Together by Github

Compare Gogs VS Commit Together by Github and see what are their differences

Tabidoo
A simple way to keep all your data under control. Build your own business applications in just 4 minutes. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Reviews
  3. ยป Alternatives

Gogs logo Gogs

A painless self-hosted Git service written in Go

Commit Together by Github logo Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits
  • Gogs Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-21
  • Commit Together by Github Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-04

Gogs features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Gogs is designed to be extremely lightweight and fast, running efficiently with minimal resource usage, which is ideal for personal projects or small teams.
  • Self-hosting
    By allowing users to host their own Git service, Gogs provides greater control over data privacy and security, making it suitable for sensitive projects.
  • Cross-platform Support
    Gogs can run on various operating systems including Windows, macOS, Linux, and ARM, offering flexible deployment options across different environments.
  • Easy Installation
    The installation process for Gogs is straightforward and quick, with binaries and Docker images available for different platforms, reducing setup time.
  • Active Development
    Gogs has an active open-source community and regular updates, ensuring new features, bug fixes, and improvements are continually being made.
  • Low Dependencies
    Gogs has few dependencies, simplifying the installation and maintenance process by reducing potential compatibility issues.
  • Customizable
    With a wide range of configuration options, Gogs allows users to tailor the platform to meet their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of Gogs

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more comprehensive Git platforms like GitLab or GitHub, Gogs lacks some advanced features such as built-in CI/CD pipelines and extensive integrations.
  • Smaller Community
    Gogs has a smaller user base compared to more popular platforms, which can lead to fewer third-party plugins, extensions, and external resources.
  • Scalability
    While Gogs is suitable for small to medium environments, it might not scale as effectively for large enterprises with extensive requirements.
  • Support
    Being an open-source project, Gogs primarily relies on community support, which may not be as immediate or extensive compared to commercial platforms offering professional support services.
  • User Interface
    While functional, Gogs' user interface is not as polished or feature-rich as those of some other Git service platforms.

Commit Together by Github features and specs

  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages of Commit Together by Github

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

Analysis of Gogs

Overall verdict

  • Gogs is generally well-regarded for its simplicity, performance, and ease of setup. It is particularly well-suited for users who do not need the full suite of features offered by larger Git services like GitHub or GitLab and prefer a more streamlined and resource-efficient solution.

Why this product is good

  • Gogs is a self-hosted Git service that is lightweight, easy to install, and simple to use. It's written in Go, which means it has minimal dependencies and can run on a variety of operating systems. This makes it an excellent choice for users who want to set up their own Git server with straightforward configuration and management. Gogs provides core Git functionalities and some additional features like an intuitive web interface, repository management, and user management.

Recommended for

  • Developers looking for a lightweight and easy-to-manage Git hosting solution.
  • Organizations that need a self-hosted option without the overhead of more complex systems.
  • Users who prioritize performance and simplicity over extensive features.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Gogs and Commit Together by Github)

Gogs

Commit Together by Github

Git
100 100%
Git
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100
Code Collaboration
100 100%
Code Collaboration
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
Productivity
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Gogs and Commit Together by Github. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Gogs and Commit Together by Github

Gogs Reviews

The Top 10 GitHub Alternatives
Lightweight: Gogs has low minimal requirements and can run on an inexpensive Raspberry Pi. Some users even run Gogs instances on their NAS devices, making it one of the few GitHub alternatives that can help you justify to your partner why youโ€™re getting a NAS device apart from for pulling the latest episodes from your favourite anime show.
Source: www.wearedevelopers.com
Gitea - Alternative to GitLab and GitHub
That said, Gita/Gogs is pretty. And might hold the hand of people only used to github. It is great that it is self-contained as a binary, so can be used with minimal configuration, like other front-ends.
Source: news.ycombinator.com

Commit Together by Github Reviews

We have no reviews of Commit Together by Github yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Gogs seems to be a lot more popular than Commit Together by Github. While we know about 29 links to Gogs, we've tracked only 1 mention of Commit Together by Github. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Gogs mentions (29)

  • 12 Open Source Alternatives to Popular Software (For Developers)
    Gogs is a lightweight, self-hosted Git service written in Go. Itโ€™s incredibly fast and easy to deploy (one binary, no dependencies), with a clean UI that mirrors GitHub. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • 100+ Must-Have Web Development Resources
    Gogs: An easy-to-setup self-hosted Git service. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Go's old $GOPATH story for development and dependencies
    Yeah, I'm actually doing that with Gitea: https://about.gitea.com/ Some people went with the forgejo fork: https://forgejo.org/ though Gitea itself was a fork of Gogs, if I remember correctly: https://gogs.io/ I also ran GitLab in the past: https://about.gitlab.com/ but keeping it updated and giving it enough resources for it to be happy was troublesome. There's also GitBucket: https://gitbucket.github.io/ and... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Forgejo forks its own path forward
    > Gitea but the other one Wouldn't that also be Gogs? https://gogs.io/ I remember when that one was what a lot of people were looking into, before the Gitea fork happened. It's odd to see how this has happened yet again, but I guess is a good thing that it's even possible in the first place, if there are indeed differing values and goals? - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Gitlab or Gitea for self-hosting Git?
    I did use https://gogs.io/ in the past. Was nice. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
View more

Commit Together by Github mentions (1)

  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Gogs and Commit Together by Github, you can also consider the following products

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

Refined GitHub - Browser extension that makes GitHub cleaner & more powerful

Gitea - A painless self-hosted Git service

GitHub for Mobile - The worldโ€™s development platform, in your pocket

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

GitHub for Atom - Git and GitHub integration right inside Atom

Loading...