Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Gitea VS Commit Together by Github

Compare Gitea VS Commit Together by Github and see what are their differences

Gitea

A painless self-hosted Git service

Gitea Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits

Commit Together by Github Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Eventtia
Event management software that runs the full lifecycle on one platform: branded event pages, registration and ticketing, email, SMS and WhatsApp campaigns, on-site check-in and badging, B2B matchmaking, a mobile app, and cross-event analytics. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Gitea seems to be a lot more popular than Commit Together by Github. While we know about 60 links to Gitea, we've tracked only 1 mention of Commit Together by Github.

social mentions
60 vs 1
Git popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 87

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Gitea
Commit Together by Github
Website about.gitea.com github.blog
Listed in
Code Collaboration Git Software Development VCS +1
Developer Tools Productivity Coding Crypto +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Gitea 7 features
Commit Together by Github 4 features
  • Open Source
    Gitea is open source, allowing users to freely inspect, modify, and contribute to its codebase. This fosters transparency and community-driven development.
  • Lightweight
    Gitea is designed to be lightweight, making it easy to run even on resource-limited systems. This makes it ideal for self-hosted environments.
  • Easy Installation
    Gitea offers a straightforward installation process, making it simple for users to get up and running quickly without complex setup procedures.
  • Rich Feature Set
    Despite being lightweight, Gitea provides a robust feature set, including issue tracking, pull requests, and continuous integration support, which covers the majority of use cases.
  • Active Community
    Gitea has an active and growing community, which contributes to its development and provides support through forums, documentation, and tutorials.
  • Customizable
    Gitea allows for extensive customization through configuration options and extensions, enabling users to tailor the platform to their specific needs.
  • Self-Hosting
    Users have full control over their repositories and data when self-hosting Gitea, which enhances privacy and security compared to third-party hosting services.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Enterprise Features
    Gitea may lack some advanced enterprise features found in other platforms like GitHub Enterprise or GitLab, such as advanced permissions management and extensive integrations.
  • Smaller Ecosystem
    Compared to larger platforms like GitHub, Gitea has a smaller ecosystem of plugins and integrations, which may limit certain functionalities.
  • Community Support
    While Gitea has an active community, it lacks the formal, professional support options available from larger commercial services, which might be a drawback for businesses seeking guaranteed support.
  • Learning Curve
    New users may experience a learning curve when transitioning to Gitea, especially if they are accustomed to other platforms with different workflows and interfaces.
  • Scalability Concerns
    For very large projects or organizations, Gitea may face scalability issues, as it is designed to be lightweight and may not handle extremely large loads as well as some competitors.
  • Update Management
    Users are responsible for managing Gitea updates and server maintenance when self-hosting, which requires additional administrative effort compared to cloud-hosted solutions.
  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Gitea
Commit Together by Github

Overall verdict

  • Gitea is generally considered a good option for users seeking a lightweight and self-hosted alternative to more resource-intensive platforms like GitLab or GitHub Enterprise. Its ease of use, open-source nature, and flexibility make it an attractive choice for personal projects or small to medium-sized teams.

Why this product is good

  • Gitea is a lightweight, self-hosted git service that's open-source and easy to set up. It's designed to be accessible and simple while offering essential features for project hosting and collaboration. Gitea supports a wide range of platforms and architectures due to its Go-based implementation, and it has a strong community support. It is particularly valued for its low resource usage and its ability to run on minimal hardware.

Recommended for

    Gitea is recommended for developers and teams who prefer self-hosted solutions and need an efficient, uncomplicated git service. It's suitable for small to medium-sized projects where simplicity, low resource requirements, and ease of deployment are key considerations. It's also a good fit for users who want full control over their source code hosting environment.

No analysis of Commit Together by Github yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Gitea 6 videos + Add
Commit Together by Github 0 videos + Add

GITEA REVIEW ⭐ TUTORIAL 👨 RUN YOUR OWN GIT SERVER 💻 $50 FREEBIE 💰

More videos

  • Review - Migrate to a Microsoft Github Alternative: Gitea
  • Review - Gitea - Git with a cup of tea - Installation and Configuration
  • Review - What’s the better Git? // GitLab vs Gitea
  • Tutorial - Self-host your own Git platform! // Gitea Tutorial
  • Review - Gitea Is A Community Run Project In Name Only

No Commit Together by Github videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Gitea
Commit Together by Github
100% 100%
Git
0% 0%
0% 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100%
100% 100%
Code Collaboration
0% 0%
0% 0%
Productivity
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Gitea and Commit Together by Github. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Gitea no reviews yet
Commit Together by Github no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of Commit Together by Github yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Gitea 60 mentions
Commit Together by Github 1 mention
  • Beware Offers of “Help” with Your Projects
    This reminds me of Gogs [0], where the original author refused a lot of good ideas and improvements, eventually leading to a fork [1] that's now a lot more popular and active than the original. [0] https://gogs.io/ [1]... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Incident with Issues and Pull Requests
    Yes, we do this using https://gitea.io/en-us/ on a private server. Firewall, backups and a replica running for most projects. Github is only used when it's required by a stakeholder. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Let's Make Sure GitHub Doesn't Become the Only Option
    There's a number of places out there, some of which also support alternatives to Git itself. By no means a complete list and in no particular order: GitLab - https://about.gitlab.com/ Sourcehut - https://sourcehut.org/ Codeberg -... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

View more

  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago

Alternatives to Gitea and Commit Together by Github

When comparing Gitea and Commit Together by Github, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...