Table of contents
Gogs
A painless self-hosted Git service written in Go.
As Gogs is an open source project, you can find more
open source alternatives and stats
on LibHunt.
Lightweight
Gogs is designed to be extremely lightweight and fast, running efficiently with minimal resource usage, which is ideal for personal projects or small teams.
Self-hosting
By allowing users to host their own Git service, Gogs provides greater control over data privacy and security, making it suitable for sensitive projects.
Cross-platform Support
Gogs can run on various operating systems including Windows, macOS, Linux, and ARM, offering flexible deployment options across different environments.
Easy Installation
The installation process for Gogs is straightforward and quick, with binaries and Docker images available for different platforms, reducing setup time.
Active Development
Gogs has an active open-source community and regular updates, ensuring new features, bug fixes, and improvements are continually being made.
Low Dependencies
Gogs has few dependencies, simplifying the installation and maintenance process by reducing potential compatibility issues.
Customizable
With a wide range of configuration options, Gogs allows users to tailor the platform to meet their specific needs.
Gogs is generally well-regarded for its simplicity, performance, and ease of setup. It is particularly well-suited for users who do not need the full suite of features offered by larger Git services like GitHub or GitLab and prefer a more streamlined and resource-efficient solution.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Gogs is good.
Check the traffic stats of Gogs on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Gogs on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Gogs's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Gogs on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Gogs on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Gogs is a lightweight, self-hosted Git service written in Go. Itโs incredibly fast and easy to deploy (one binary, no dependencies), with a clean UI that mirrors GitHub. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
Gogs: An easy-to-setup self-hosted Git service. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Yeah, I'm actually doing that with Gitea: https://about.gitea.com/ Some people went with the forgejo fork: https://forgejo.org/ though Gitea itself was a fork of Gogs, if I remember correctly: https://gogs.io/ I also ran GitLab in the past: https://about.gitlab.com/ but keeping it updated and giving it enough resources for it to be happy was troublesome. There's also GitBucket: https://gitbucket.github.io/ and... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
> Gitea but the other one Wouldn't that also be Gogs? https://gogs.io/ I remember when that one was what a lot of people were looking into, before the Gitea fork happened. It's odd to see how this has happened yet again, but I guess is a good thing that it's even possible in the first place, if there are indeed differing values and goals? - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
I did use https://gogs.io/ in the past. Was nice. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
This reminds me of Gogs [0], where the original author refused a lot of good ideas and improvements, eventually leading to a fork [1] that's now a lot more popular and active than the original. [0] https://gogs.io/ [1] https://gitea.io/en-us/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
To me I like the best GOGS https://gogs.io/. Same features like GitHub but all local and lightweight. Source: about 3 years ago
There's a number of places out there, some of which also support alternatives to Git itself. By no means a complete list and in no particular order: GitLab - https://about.gitlab.com/ Sourcehut - https://sourcehut.org/ Codeberg - https://codeberg.org/ Launchpad - https://launchpad.net/ Debian Salsa - https://salsa.debian.org/public Pagure - https://pagure.io/pagure For self hsoted options, there's these below... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
Gogs is really easy to deploy and has a familiar UI. Source: over 3 years ago
GitHub is Microsoft's privately owned service that provides hosting and other features for Git repositories. There are other services which provide comparable services: GitLab, BitBucket.. You can also self-host such a service (Gogs, Gitea..). Source: over 3 years ago
Gogs says it works on Pi. I've used it for a few clients that requested self-hosted repos and it's very nice. Source: over 3 years ago
There was no drama as far as I recall, just complaints that he wasn't agile enough or something like that. The different project is Gogs https://gogs.io/ and its author is Joe Chen ('unknwon:). - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
I don't know if anyone remembers but Gitea is a fork of https://gogs.io/. If I've understood correctly they forked because the feeling was that Gogs wasn't a true open source project. Source: over 3 years ago
Is Gogs the way to go now? Or am I misreading this as a repeate of Audacity? Source: over 3 years ago
Https://gogs.io/ Seems nice. Not sure how good it integrates with Jira. But has a built-in issue tracker and wiki. Source: almost 4 years ago
I found Gitlab a bit of a pain to configure, and went instead for a simple docker solution with: GoGs. Source: almost 4 years ago
My experience with GitLab is that they accelerated very quickly in the beginning with a focus on new features. This made the whole ecosystem incredibly slow, and it's unbearable for me to run as a service on my own hardware / cloud accounts. I guess that's the problem with these open source services that also rely on paid platform income. I have tested out https://gogs.io/ and the difference in speed is just... - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
> I tend to install FOSS because imo they are more "future-proof", but some of them are developed by companies (e.g., Fedora Linux) and that makes me wonder if they're truly future-proof. The story of CentOS should be telling that, no, many pieces of software that are backed by a company will not be future-proof and will probably experience certain changes as a consequence of that, be it being transformed to... - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
Gitea or Gogs would work. You can set up users in both. Source: about 4 years ago
Gogs maybe? https://gogs.io/ Not sure if that's exactly what you're looking for. No idea if you can use it in docker. I used gogs for about a year and a half with zero problems. Source: about 4 years ago
I love gogs for the purpose. Itโs very lightweight and easy to configure. Source: about 4 years ago
Gogs, an open-source self-hosted Git service, continues to garner attention within the software development community as a lightweight and reliable alternative to some of the more resource-heavy Git hosting platforms. It is heralded for its low minimal requirements and ease of deployment, thus making it an attractive option for those looking to establish a self-hosted Git service without investing heavily in hardware. Enthusiasts appreciate its ability to run efficiently on inexpensive hardware, such as a Raspberry Pi or NAS devices, rendering it a practical choice for personal or small-scale professional use.
One of Gogs' notable advantages is its simplicity in setup and configuration. Users frequently highlight its self-contained binary nature, which requires minimal configuration, allowing for seamless integration into existing systems. This feature is particularly advantageous in scenarios where rapid deployment is necessary without the overhead of complex installations or extensive resource allocation, as is often the case with its competitors like GitLab or GitHub.
Public opinion underscores Gogs' capability of serving as a functional GitHub alternative, providing similar features on a local scale. Its user interface, reminiscent of GitHub's, facilitates an easy transition for developers familiar with the GitHub ecosystem, easing adaptation and minimizing learning curves. These attributes contribute to Gogs being labeled as a "lightweight" yet powerful tool in the domain of self-hosted Git services.
However, amid its praise, Gogs has also faced criticism regarding its developmental trajectory. Concerns have been raised about the pace of innovation and adoption of community-suggested improvements, which culminated in the creation of Gitea, a fork of Gogs. Gitea has since gained a reputation for being more actively developed and responsive to community contributions, suggesting a divergence in values and goals between the original Gogs project and its fork. This historical split highlights a potential risk for users relying on Gogs for long-term projects, as evolving needs may not always align with Gogs' developmental pace.
Despite these challenges, Gogs remains an admired option for users desiring control and privacy offered by self-hosted solutions. Its strong focus on providing essential features with minimal resource requirements ensures its continued relevance, especially among developers valuing efficiency and straightforward deployment. While Gogs may not rival the feature richness of platforms like GitHub or GitLab, its emphasis on lightweight performance continues to define its niche within the software development landscape, particularly appealing to those prioritizing simplicity and resource efficiency.
In essence, Gogs stands as a testament to the diversity and adaptability available within the open-source community, meeting specific needs for those seeking a streamlined, self-hosted Git experience. Its enduring presence as a viable alternative underscores the importance of lightweight solutions in a domain often dominated by feature-heavy giants.
Do you know an article comparing Gogs to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Gogs good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Gogs here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
