
Plausible.io
Google Analytics
Matomo
Simple Analytics
umami
Clicky
Mixpanel
Simple, trustworthy website analytics (finally)

ASP.NET
ASP.NET Core
Django
Laravel
Ruby on Rails
Spring Framework
Flask
CodeBehind is a new framework based on .NET Core version 7.0. The CodeBehind framework inherits all the features of .NET Core and gives it more simplicity and flexibility. CodeBehind framework is owned by Elanat.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Fathom Analytics seems to be a lot more popular than CodeBehind Framework. While we know about 67 links to Fathom Analytics, we've tracked only 3 mentions of CodeBehind Framework.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | usefathom.com | elanat.net |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | β | |
| Company | Startup from Canada | 2023 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Fathom Analytics yet.
CodeBehind library is a modern back-end framework and is an alternative to ASP.NET Core. This library is a programming model based on the MVC structure, which provides the possibility of creating dynamic aspx files in .NET Core and has high serverside independence. CodeBehind framework supports...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of Fathom Analytics yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
FATHOM ANALYTICS REVIEW π INSTALL πΈ $100 (OPEN SOURCE)
More videos
No CodeBehind Framework videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0β100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Fathom Analytics and CodeBehind Framework.
CodeBehind Framework's answer:
The Elanat team has created a very large content management system called Elanat CMS using the CodeBehind framework.
CodeBehind Framework's answer:
The CodeBehind framework is an engineering masterpiece; every project built with CodeBehind is modular and the project itself is a module. Return template is a wonderful feature of the CodeBehind framework; using the return template makes it unnecessary to add server-side codes in the HTML section.
CodeBehind Framework's answer:
The CodeBehind framework was created to compete with the default ASP.NET Core framework. Developing with CodeBehind framework is very easy and understandable, while developing in ASP.NET Core is hard and challenging.
CodeBehind Framework's answer:
CodeBehind framework has a simple and understandable structure. This framework is even faster than the default structure of cshtml pages in ASP.NET Core.
Share your experience with using Fathom Analytics and CodeBehind Framework. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


This differentiates Fathom Analytics from alternatives that collect vast amounts of customersβ personal information.
Fathom Analytics is known for its emphasis on privacy, providing website analytics without invasive tracking methods. It maintains user data integrity, ensuring compliance with regulations like GDPR.
We have no reviews of CodeBehind Framework yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


AI referrals are human visits whose browser sends a recognizable AI-tool referrer. Fathom's current site says teams can explore AI referrals and filter the dashboard to see what those visitors do. Give it credit for that; this is no... - Source: dev.to / 16 days ago
So this post is about something I've been chewing on for months but finally moved on: ripping Google Analytics out of three side projects and picking a privacy-focused alternative. Specifically, I'll compare Umami, Plausible, and Fathom... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Fathom is the most "premium" option. No self-hosted version β it's a paid product, and they lean into that. The upside is it just works, with excellent uptime and performance. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
CodeBehind is a new back-end framework based on ASP.NET Core. CodeBehind is owned by the Elanat team and competes with Microsoft's default web frameworks (Razor Pages, MVC, and Blazer) on .NET Core. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
As you can see, we introduced the modular structure of the powerful CodeBehind framework in practice. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
CodeBehind page: Https://elanat.net/page_content/code_behind. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
When comparing Fathom Analytics and CodeBehind Framework, you can also consider the following products.

Plausible Analytics is a simple, open-source, lightweight (< 1 KB) and privacy-friendly web analytics alternative to Google Analytics. Made and hosted in the EU, powered by European-owned cloud infrastructure πͺπΊ
Compare Plausible.io to Fathom Analytics or CodeBehind Framework:

ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.
Compare ASP.NET to Fathom Analytics or CodeBehind Framework:

Improve your website to increase conversions, improve the user experience, and make more money using Google Analytics. Measure, understand and quantify engagement on your site with customized and in-depth reports.
Compare Google Analytics to Fathom Analytics or CodeBehind Framework:


Matomo is an open-source web analytics platform
Compare Matomo to Fathom Analytics or CodeBehind Framework:

The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines
Compare Django to Fathom Analytics or CodeBehind Framework: