Streamline icons VS Commit Together by Github

• Comprehensive Collection
  Streamline offers a vast array of icons across multiple categories, ensuring that users can find suitable icons for almost any project.
• High Quality
  All icons are meticulously designed with attention to detail, providing a professional and polished look.
• Multiple Formats
  Icons are available in various formats such as SVG, PNG, and PDF, enabling flexibility for different use cases.
• Consistent Style
  Icons maintain a cohesive visual language, making it easier to create a uniform look across different parts of a project.
• Customization
  Users have the ability to customize the icons to suit their specific needs, such as changing colors or sizes.
• Frequent Updates
  The library is regularly updated with new icons and features, ensuring that users have access to the latest design trends.

Possible disadvantages

• Cost
  High-quality icons come with a premium price, which may be prohibitive for small businesses or individual users on a tight budget.
• Overwhelming Choice
  The sheer number of icons available might be overwhelming and make it difficult for users to quickly find the icons they need.
• Requires Design Skill
  Although customizable, tweaking the icons to perfectly fit a project may require a certain level of design skill.
• Lack of Uniqueness
  Because the icons are widely used, there is a chance that multiple projects will use the same icons, reducing the uniqueness of a design.
• Internet Dependency
  Access to full features and updates is largely dependent on an internet connection, which could be a limitation in some scenarios.

• Enhanced Collaboration
  Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
• Improved Code Review Process
  With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
• Accountability
  By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
• Efficiency in Pair Programming
  When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages

• Complex Commit History
  Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
• Potential Workflow Conflicts
  Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
• Initial Setup Overhead
  Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
• Tooling Compatibility
  Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

• How We Built a Visual Studio Code Plugin in just 3 Weeks Using an Iframe

  Go to StreamlineHQ.com → Download the icon SVG → Open the Downloads folder → Move the file to /assets → Import it → Want to change it? Go back to step one. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Powerpoint icons?

  Also check streamline icons. https://streamlinehq.com/. Source: over 4 years ago

• Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?

  There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago