raylib VS mruby

• Simple and Easy to Use
  Raylib offers a straightforward API, making it ideal for beginners and those looking to quickly prototype game ideas without dealing with complex set-up or configurations.
• Cross-Platform Support
  Raylib supports multiple platforms, including Windows, Linux, macOS, and HTML5, allowing developers to build games that can run on different operating systems.
• Lightweight
  This library is lightweight and requires minimal dependencies, which makes it fast to compile and easy to include in various projects.
• Modular Design
  Raylib's modular design allows developers to use only the modules they need, which can help to optimize the application and reduce its size.
• Growing Community
  With an active and growing community, raylib provides a support network of enthusiasts and developers, as well as a variety of tutorials and shared projects.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Advanced Features
  Raylib may lack some of the more advanced features found in other mature game development frameworks, which might be a drawback for experienced developers looking for advanced functionalities.
• Smaller Ecosystem
  Compared to more popular engines, raylib has a smaller ecosystem, meaning fewer third-party tools, plugins, and extensions, which could limit development options.
• Learning Curve for Advanced Topics
  While it's beginner-friendly at a basic level, mastering more advanced development with raylib may require digging deeper into C programming and understanding low-level details.
• Limited Official Documentation
  The official documentation, although available, might not be as comprehensive or detailed as what’s offered by larger frameworks, potentially leading to reliance on community support.
• Lack of Built-in UI Tools
  Raylib does not include extensive graphical user interface tools, so developers might need to implement their own UI system or integrate third-party libraries for complex UI tasks.

• Lightweight
  mruby is designed to be small and lightweight, making it ideal for embedding in applications with limited resources.
• Embeddable
  mruby can be easily embedded into software applications, allowing developers to script functionalities within the application.
• Fast Execution
  It provides quick startup and execution times compared to many typical Ruby implementations, which enhances performance in resource-constrained environments.
• Simple License
  mruby is distributed under a simple and permissive license (MIT License), which is business-friendly and promotes wide adoption.
• Compatibility with Ruby Syntax
  mruby aims to be compatible with Ruby syntax, making it easier for developers familiar with Ruby to adopt and use it.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Standard Library
  mruby has a more limited standard library compared to full Ruby implementations, which can restrict development or require additional effort to implement missing features.
• Less Mature
  Being a smaller and newer implementation, it might lack the robustness and extensive library support seen in more mature Ruby versions like MRI.
• Less Community Support
  The community around mruby is smaller compared to the broader Ruby community, potentially leading to fewer resources or third-party libraries.
• Incompatibility with Some Ruby Gems
  Not all Ruby gems are compatible with mruby, as some rely on native extensions or parts of the Ruby standard library that are absent in mruby.
• Limited Debugging Tools
  The debugging and profiling tools available for mruby are not as extensive as those available for regular Ruby, which can make troubleshooting more challenging.

Raylib 3.0 Released -- The Best Way to Learn C or C++ Game Development*

More videos

No mruby videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• Raylib, a hidden Powerhouse
  SaaSHub review

  · Jan 2022

  I got to know Raylib just a few days ago taking a course on learning C++ to start using Unreal Engine. I have a background with assembler(a long time ago), Python/Pygame, C#/Monogame, and Unity/C#. Within the few days...

We have no reviews of mruby yet. Be the first one to post

• New Year, New Game Engine - Nikola Engine Devlog 0

  You see, for the past several years I have used many programming languages and many more game frameworks and libraries. Programming languages like Java, C#, C++, and even, sadly, JavaScript (I know...). Game frameworks like LWJGL, SDL2,... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Are there any game engines that support 3D that are more code orientated?

  It sounds like you're maybe asking for code frameworks/libraries instead of engines? Something like https://raylib.com/ might be better suited? Source: over 3 years ago

• How can I make graphics games using cpp?

  I would recommend SFML or Raylib, they're both excellent and fairly easy to set up, plus have really good documentation. And if you decide to really dig into them you'll eventually be able to create any game you want. Source: about 4 years ago

View more

• Embed mruby as a Single Binary That Runs Everywhere

  I already have lua embeded into Rapidforge binary because lets admit it after certain size its very difficult to code with bash. I wanted to support mruby as well becuase I really love ruby and I think you can express complex ideas... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

• Playing with DragonRuby Game Toolkit (DRGTK)

  This Ruby implementation is based on mruby and LLVM and it’s commercial software but cheap. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

• Natalie – a work-in-progress Ruby compiler, written in Ruby and C++

  > I guess the standard Ruby compiler doesn't allow you to spit out binaries Ruby is an interpreted language (+ JIT compiler). I wonder what makes this different from mruby[1] which seems to be very well supported for many years. [1]... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

View more