Pipedrive Reviews

1. Pieter Jan

   | Co-founder at Vizito | almost 2 years ago
   The best CRM for our SaaS business

   Pipedrive has made our business much more efficient in following up deals. Keep track of deals, meetings, mails and phone calls all in one place. We can quickly follow up on offers and used Pipedrive's automations and API to integrate our Vizito trials directly into Pipedrive.

   It offers the most flexibility while maintaining an easy-to-use interface and their support is superb!

   Keep up the great work!

   🏁 Competitors: HubSpot CRM, Teamleader

   👍 Pros:    Easy to use|Quick and easy|Stable|Easy integration|Api integration|Rest api|Cost-efficient
2. jeet998

   | Chief Manager at Entab Infotech Pvt Ltd | over 4 years ago
   Best CRM Software: PipeDrive

   All alternatives are good but we prefer Pipedrive because of its great customization and most fit for company/business development.

runc Reviews

Pipedrive mentions (2)

• Why doesn't Microsoft have a better CRM product...?

  I feel like Microsoft could offer a more robust CRM than what's present with 'Contacts' under Outlook, and pretty easily. Something like Pipedrive... I mean it could syncronize all the datapoints that local Microsoft programs already have access to: mail, contacts, projects, teams, and LinkedIn. Source: over 1 year ago

• Building Reach in Public

  Pipedrive → our CRM for tracking leads, tasks, conversations, and deals. We chose Pipedrive because it does a good job of providing an intuitive and relatively simple CRM while still having enough features to track our sales conversations. Pricing is accessible. Source: over 2 years ago

runc mentions (8)

• US Cybersecurity: The Urgent Need for Memory Safety in Software Products

  It's interesting that, in light of things like this, you still see large software companies adding support for new components written in non-memory safe languages (e.g. C) As an example Red Hat OpenShift added support for crun(https://github.com/containers/crun), which is written in C as an alternative to runc, which is written in Go( - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago

• Why did the Krustlet project die?

  Yeah, runtimeClass lets you specify which CRI plugin you want based on what you have available. Here's an example from the containerd documentation - you could have one node that can run containers under standard runc, gvisor, kata containers, or WASM. Without runtimeClass, you'd need either some form of custom solution or four differently configured nodes to run those different runtimes. That's how krustlet did... Source: over 1 year ago

• Why use Docker in 2022?

  Your Docker Container can only run Linux. That's because Docker takes advantage of runC which uses the Linux kernel. You can't run Windows inside of Docker. But of course you can run Docker on a Windows host machine. If you are running a .NET project, you won't be able to use Docker. On the other hand, if you're running .NET Core then you're in luck! - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

• Containers without Docker (podman, buildah, and skopeo)

  This is what Podman, an open-source daemonless and rootless container engine, was developed with in mind. Podman runs using the runC container runtime process, directly on the Linux kernel, and launches containers and pods as child processes. In addition, it was developed for the Docker developer, with most commands and syntax seamlessly mirroring Docker's. Buildah, an image builder, and Skopeo, the image utility... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

• Learn Docker - from the beginning, part I images and containers

  If you are curious about how exactly Docker does this I urge to have a look at the following links on layered file system and the library runc and also this great wikipedia overview of Docker. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago