Software Alternatives & Startups

mruby VS raylib

Compare mruby VS raylib and see what are their differences

mruby

Game Development

Rating
0 reviews
raylib

Cross-platform, open-source game development library in C.

Rating
5.0 · 1 review
Pricing
Open source

Which is more popular?

mruby might be a bit more popular than raylib. We know about 8 links to it since March 2021 and only 7 links to raylib.

social mentions
8 vs 7
Programming Language popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
18 vs 61

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

mruby
raylib
Website mruby.org raylib.com
Pricing —
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

mruby 5 features
raylib 5 features
  • Lightweight
    mruby is designed to be small and lightweight, making it ideal for embedding in applications with limited resources.
  • Embeddable
    mruby can be easily embedded into software applications, allowing developers to script functionalities within the application.
  • Fast Execution
    It provides quick startup and execution times compared to many typical Ruby implementations, which enhances performance in resource-constrained environments.
  • Simple License
    mruby is distributed under a simple and permissive license (MIT License), which is business-friendly and promotes wide adoption.
  • Compatibility with Ruby Syntax
    mruby aims to be compatible with Ruby syntax, making it easier for developers familiar with Ruby to adopt and use it.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Standard Library
    mruby has a more limited standard library compared to full Ruby implementations, which can restrict development or require additional effort to implement missing features.
  • Less Mature
    Being a smaller and newer implementation, it might lack the robustness and extensive library support seen in more mature Ruby versions like MRI.
  • Less Community Support
    The community around mruby is smaller compared to the broader Ruby community, potentially leading to fewer resources or third-party libraries.
  • Incompatibility with Some Ruby Gems
    Not all Ruby gems are compatible with mruby, as some rely on native extensions or parts of the Ruby standard library that are absent in mruby.
  • Limited Debugging Tools
    The debugging and profiling tools available for mruby are not as extensive as those available for regular Ruby, which can make troubleshooting more challenging.
  • Simple and Easy to Use
    Raylib offers a straightforward API, making it ideal for beginners and those looking to quickly prototype game ideas without dealing with complex set-up or configurations.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Raylib supports multiple platforms, including Windows, Linux, macOS, and HTML5, allowing developers to build games that can run on different operating systems.
  • Lightweight
    This library is lightweight and requires minimal dependencies, which makes it fast to compile and easy to include in various projects.
  • Modular Design
    Raylib's modular design allows developers to use only the modules they need, which can help to optimize the application and reduce its size.
  • Growing Community
    With an active and growing community, raylib provides a support network of enthusiasts and developers, as well as a variety of tutorials and shared projects.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Raylib may lack some of the more advanced features found in other mature game development frameworks, which might be a drawback for experienced developers looking for advanced functionalities.
  • Smaller Ecosystem
    Compared to more popular engines, raylib has a smaller ecosystem, meaning fewer third-party tools, plugins, and extensions, which could limit development options.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Topics
    While it's beginner-friendly at a basic level, mastering more advanced development with raylib may require digging deeper into C programming and understanding low-level details.
  • Limited Official Documentation
    The official documentation, although available, might not be as comprehensive or detailed as what’s offered by larger frameworks, potentially leading to reliance on community support.
  • Lack of Built-in UI Tools
    Raylib does not include extensive graphical user interface tools, so developers might need to implement their own UI system or integrate third-party libraries for complex UI tasks.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

mruby 0 videos + Add
raylib 3 videos + Add

No mruby videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Raylib 3.0 Released -- The Best Way to Learn C or C++ Game Development*

More videos

  • - Raylib tutorial | Episode 1 | Setting up Raylib and Creating a Window
  • - RayLib Receives An Epic MegaGrant!

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
mruby
raylib
100% 100%
0% 0%
32% 32%
68% 68%
100% 100%
OOP
0% 0%
32% 32%
68% 68%

User comments

Share your experience with using mruby and raylib. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

mruby no reviews yet
raylib 5.0 · 1 review

We have no reviews of mruby yet. Be the first one to post

  • Raylib, a hidden Powerhouse
    SaaSHub review
    · Jan 2022

    I got to know Raylib just a few days ago taking a course on learning C++ to start using Unreal Engine. I have a background with assembler(a long time ago), Python/Pygame, C#/Monogame, and Unity/C#. Within the few days...

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

mruby 8 mentions
raylib 7 mentions
  • Embed mruby as a Single Binary That Runs Everywhere
    I already have lua embeded into Rapidforge binary because lets admit it after certain size its very difficult to code with bash. I wanted to support mruby as well becuase I really love ruby and I think you can express complex ideas... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Playing with DragonRuby Game Toolkit (DRGTK)
    This Ruby implementation is based on mruby and LLVM and it’s commercial software but cheap. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Natalie – a work-in-progress Ruby compiler, written in Ruby and C++
    > I guess the standard Ruby compiler doesn't allow you to spit out binaries Ruby is an interpreted language (+ JIT compiler). I wonder what makes this different from mruby[1] which seems to be very well supported for many years. [1]... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

View more

  • New Year, New Game Engine - Nikola Engine Devlog 0
    You see, for the past several years I have used many programming languages and many more game frameworks and libraries. Programming languages like Java, C#, C++, and even, sadly, JavaScript (I know...). Game frameworks like LWJGL, SDL2,... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Are there any game engines that support 3D that are more code orientated?
    It sounds like you're maybe asking for code frameworks/libraries instead of engines? Something like https://raylib.com/ might be better suited? Source: over 3 years ago
  • How can I make graphics games using cpp?
    I would recommend SFML or Raylib, they're both excellent and fairly easy to set up, plus have really good documentation. And if you decide to really dig into them you'll eventually be able to create any game you want. Source: about 4 years ago

View more

Alternatives to mruby and raylib

When comparing mruby and raylib, you can also consider the following products.