Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Matomo VS TraceUX.dev

Compare Matomo VS TraceUX.dev and see what are their differences

Matomo

Matomo is an open-source web analytics platform

Rating
5.0 · 1 review
Pricing
Open source
To be Vibe Voted
Alternatives Is it good?
TraceUX.dev

Replay every journey, collect feedback, support users, and ship updates with no vendor session caps. Free forever and self-hosted.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
PrivacyNotes
Notes, tasks, passwords, journal, files, calendar, contacts and bookmarks, with mood and medication tracking. Encrypted on your device. Open source, no ads, no trackers. Free forever; Pro is a one-time purchase. sponsored

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Matomo seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 86 times since March 2021.

social mentions
86 vs 0
Analytics popularity
99% vs 1%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 4

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Matomo
TraceUX.dev
Website matomo.org trace-ux.builtbyfrank.dev
Pricing
Open source Official pricing
Open source
Platforms —
Web TypeScript NPM
Company Startup from New Zealand —
Listed in
Analytics Web Analytics Open Source Privacy +1
UX Analytics Web Analytics Website Monitoring Screen Recording +2

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Matomo 6 features
TraceUX.dev 0 features
  • Open Source
    Matomo is an open-source platform, allowing for customization and transparency in how data is collected and processed.
  • Data Ownership
    Users have full ownership of their data, ensuring that no third-party entities have access to sensitive information.
  • Privacy Compliance
    Matomo is designed with privacy in mind, making it easier to comply with GDPR, CCPA, and other data protection regulations.
  • Self-Hosting Option
    Matomo can be self-hosted, giving users complete control over their data security and server environment.
  • Feature-Rich
    The platform offers a wide range of features, including A/B testing, heatmaps, session recording, and more.
  • Community Support
    A large community of users and developers contributes plugins, improvements, and support, enriching the ecosystem.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Setup
    The initial setup, especially for self-hosted versions, can be complex and time-consuming, requiring technical expertise.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running Matomo, particularly its self-hosted version, can be resource-intensive, requiring significant server capabilities.
  • Cost for Advanced Features
    While the basic version is free, advanced features and cloud hosting come at a cost, which might be expensive for small businesses.
  • Limited Integrations
    Matomo offers fewer integrations with other marketing and analytics tools compared to some other platforms like Google Analytics.
  • Learning Curve
    New users may find the interface and advanced features challenging to learn and navigate initially.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users report performance issues, particularly with large volumes of data or on less powerful servers.

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Matomo
TraceUX.dev

Overall verdict

  • Matomo is a good choice for those who prioritize data privacy and require a comprehensive analytics tool that can be self-hosted. It's especially suitable for organizations hesitant about sharing data with third-party services and for those looking for customizable and transparent analytics solutions.

Why this product is good

  • Matomo is a popular open-source web analytics platform that provides in-depth insights into website traffic, user behavior, conversion rates, and more. It's considered a robust alternative to Google Analytics, with a focus on data privacy, as users can host the platform on their own servers or use Matomo's cloud-based service. Matomo offers features such as heatmaps, session recordings, goal tracking, and more, which can be particularly valuable for businesses looking to gain a detailed understanding of their website performance while maintaining control over their data.

Recommended for

  • Privacy-conscious businesses
  • Web developers
  • Data analysts
  • E-commerce sites
  • Organizations with in-house IT capabilities
  • Government and educational institutions
  • Non-profits looking for cost-effective solutions

No analysis of TraceUX.dev yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Matomo 5 videos + Add
TraceUX.dev 0 videos + Add

Matomo Analytics - Dashboards

More videos

  • - WP-Matomo (WP-Piwik) Review: Open Source Analytics For WordPress
  • - What are the differences between Matomo Analytics and Google Analytics
  • - AMU WEBD122 - Spohnholtz Piwik Analytics Review
  • - Matomo On-Premise installation overview

No TraceUX.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Matomo
TraceUX.dev
99% 99%
Analytics
1% 1%
99% 99%
Web Analytics
1% 1%
100% 100%
Privacy
0% 0%
0% 0%
UX
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Matomo and TraceUX.dev.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

TraceUX.dev's answer:

ReplyPro uses TraceUX to monitor platform errors and get alerts on Slack

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

TraceUX.dev's answer:

Go powers the backend, SQLite handles storage, and React, TypeScript, and Vite power the dashboard. The TypeScript browser tracker uses rrweb to record DOM events, while rrweb-player reconstructs sessions for playback. The dashboard is embedded in the Go binary, and Docker deployment is also supported.

What's the story behind your product?

TraceUX.dev's answer:

At the company I worked for, we used Smartlook to understand user behavior and investigate problems. When Smartlook shut down, we looked for a replacement, but the alternatives we found were too expensive. That led me to build TraceUX as a side project in my time outside work.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

TraceUX.dev's answer:

Independent developers, technical founders, and small product teams running web applications.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

TraceUX.dev's answer:

Choose TraceUX if you want to understand user behavior while keeping recordings on infrastructure you control. It is free to self-host, with no vendor-enforced session caps or per-seat license fees.

What makes your product unique?

TraceUX.dev's answer:

TraceUX combines session replay, in-product feedback, announcements, browser logs, and backend performance insights in one self-hosted dashboard. It runs as a single Go binary with SQLite and an embedded dashboard, without requiring a separate database or a stack of services. Feedback can be linked to the session that produced it, connecting what users report with what actually happened.

User comments

Share your experience with using Matomo and TraceUX.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Matomo 5.0 · 1 review
TraceUX.dev no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of TraceUX.dev yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Matomo 86 mentions
TraceUX.dev 0 mentions

View more

Tracking TraceUX.dev since Oct 2026.

Alternatives to Matomo and TraceUX.dev

When comparing Matomo and TraceUX.dev, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...