Software Alternatives & Startups

Magic Flow VS Keeping

Compare Magic Flow VS Keeping and see what are their differences

Magic Flow

Generate high-converting landing page copy using GPT-3

Rating
0 reviews
Keeping

Turns Google Workspace Into Your Team’s Help Desk

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Paid Free trial

Which is more popular?

Productivity popularity
92% vs 8%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 89

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Magic Flow
Keeping
Website magicflow.io keeping.com
Pricing —
Paid Free trial Official pricing
Company — Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2020
Listed in

About Magic Flow and Keeping

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Magic Flow
Keeping

No description of Magic Flow yet.

Keeping is a shared inbox and helpdesk tool that lives inside Gmail, turning a shared mailbox like support@company(dot)com into a collaborative workspace where customer emails become trackable tickets with assignments, statuses, tags, and collision detection. It adds helpdesk power (templates,...

Read more about Keeping

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Magic Flow 5 features
Keeping 6 features
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Magic Flow offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible for users of all experience levels.
  • Customizable Workflows
    The platform allows users to tailor workflows to their specific needs, providing flexibility and better alignment with their processes.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Magic Flow supports a variety of integrations with popular third-party applications, facilitating seamless data transfer and automation.
  • Collaborative Features
    Team members can easily collaborate and share progress within the platform, improving communication and coordination.
  • Robust Reporting
    The platform offers detailed reporting and analytics, enabling users to track performance and identify areas for improvement.

Possible disadvantages

  • Pricing
    For smaller teams or startups, the subscription fees might be considered relatively high compared to other workflow tools on the market.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, there might still be a learning curve for new users to fully utilize all features and capabilities.
  • Limited Offline Access
    The platform primarily functions online, and limited offline capabilities can be restrictive for users needing to work without internet access.
  • Feature Overload
    Some users might find an excess of features overwhelming, particularly if they only need basic workflow management functionality.
  • Customer Support
    While customer support exists, response times and effectiveness can vary, potentially leading to delays in issue resolution.
  • Shared Inbox
    Collaborate on your shared inbox from Gmail
  • Automated Workflows
    Tag, assign, and process email automatically
  • Lives in Gmail
    No extra tabs or apps to learn
  • Unlimited Mailboxes
    Add as many shared mailboxes as you like for free
  • Powerful Analytics
    Track first response time, volume, and measure your team
  • Collision Detection
    Never answer the same email twice

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Magic Flow
Keeping

Overall verdict

  • Magic Flow is generally considered a good solution for businesses looking to improve efficiency and reduce manual work through automation. Its ability to adapt to different business contexts and its supportive community can be appealing to many users.

Why this product is good

  • Magic Flow is designed to streamline workflow automation, making it easier for businesses to integrate various tools and automate repetitive tasks. It offers a user-friendly interface and a wide range of integrations, allowing users to customize their workflows according to their specific needs.

Recommended for

  • Small to medium-sized businesses seeking to automate their processes.
  • Teams looking for ways to integrate multiple tools and platforms.
  • Users who prefer a low-code or no-code solution for workflow automation.

No analysis of Keeping yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Magic Flow 2 videos + Add
Keeping 2 videos + Add

What’s A Magic Flow Ring? | Poundland Product Review

More videos

  • - Magic Flow Trick

DROP 2025 REVIEW | Keeping the Shot INTERESTING!

More videos

  • - I hate it, I'm keeping it. SMSL PL200T CD transport review.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Magic Flow
Keeping
92% 92%
8% 8%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Magic Flow and Keeping.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Keeping's answer:

Small and medium sized businesses

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Keeping's answer:

Built in GCP (Google Cloud), with React, Elixir, and Phoenix.

What's the story behind your product?

Keeping's answer:

Keeping was built to help teams manage customer support without leaving Gmail. It brings the structure of a help desk to shared inboxes, making it easier to assign, track, and respond to customer emails as a team.

User comments

Share your experience with using Magic Flow and Keeping. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Magic Flow no reviews yet
Keeping no reviews yet

We have no reviews of Magic Flow yet. Be the first one to post

Alternatives to Magic Flow and Keeping

When comparing Magic Flow and Keeping, you can also consider the following products.