Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) VS mini_httpd

Compare LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) VS mini_httpd and see what are their differences

LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) logo LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS)

LiteSpeed Web Server Documentation - Server General

mini_httpd logo mini_httpd

mini_httpd is a small HTTP server for low or medium traffic sites.
  • LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-05-30
  • mini_httpd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-06

LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) features and specs

  • High Performance
    LiteSpeed Web Server is known for its high performance and speed, especially under high traffic conditions. It uses event-driven architecture which helps handle thousands of connections with minimal resource usage.
  • HTTP/3 Support
    LSWS offers full HTTP/3 support, which is beneficial for improved load times and performance by utilizing new protocol advantages over older versions like HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2.
  • Built-in Caching
    LiteSpeed includes built-in server-side caching mechanisms such as LiteSpeed Cache, which significantly boosts loading times and reduces server load.
  • Security Features
    LSWS provides robust security features, including DDoS protection, support for mod_security rules, and features like reCAPTCHA for login pages.
  • Compatibility with Apache
    LiteSpeed is designed to be a drop-in replacement for Apache, and it is compatible with Apache configuration files (.htaccess), making migration smooth and easy.

Possible disadvantages of LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS)

  • License Cost
    Unlike some alternatives like Apache or Nginx, LiteSpeed Web Server is a paid software, which means there are licensing costs associated with its use.
  • Administration Complexity
    For those unfamiliar with it, configuring and managing LiteSpeed might present a learning curve, especially for people accustomed to using free, widely-used software like Apache.
  • Limited Open-Source Contributions
    As LiteSpeed is not open-source, it has a smaller community of developers and limited third-party contributions compared to open-source alternatives.
  • Compatibility Issues
    While LSWS is highly compatible with Apache, certain extensions or modules may not be fully supported, leading to potential compatibility issues with some applications.
  • Resource Usage
    Although LiteSpeed is optimized for high performance, it may appear to utilize more resources than needed when not configured correctly, especially in smaller or low-traffic environments.

mini_httpd features and specs

  • Lightweight
    mini_httpd is designed to be a minimal and lightweight HTTP server, which makes it consume very little system resources. This can be beneficial for systems with limited resources or for specific use-cases requiring simple functionalities.
  • Easy to configure
    With its minimalistic approach, mini_httpd is straightforward to configure and set up. This simplicity can be advantageous for users who need a basic server setup quickly.
  • Security focus
    mini_httpd offers certain security features like basic authentication and stringent simplicities which might result in fewer vulnerabilities compared to more complex servers.
  • Good for static content
    It is particularly well-suited for serving static content efficiently due to its simple architecture, which can be handy for websites that do not require dynamic content rendering.

Possible disadvantages of mini_httpd

  • Limited functionality
    Due to its minimalistic design, mini_httpd lacks many of the advanced features found in more comprehensive web servers, such as dynamic content handling and extensive configurability.
  • Lack of updates
    The development and update frequency of mini_httpd may not be as active as other popular web servers, potentially leading to security and compatibility concerns over time.
  • Not suitable for high traffic
    mini_httpd may not be ideal for handling high traffic loads or complex server-side operations, as it is not optimized for high performance under such conditions.
  • Limited community and support
    The user community and support options for mini_httpd are smaller compared to larger, more popular web servers, which can make troubleshooting and obtaining help more challenging.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) and mini_httpd)
Web Servers
66 66%
34% 34
Web And Application Servers
Application Server
71 71%
29% 29
HTTP/2 Web Server
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) and mini_httpd. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, mini_httpd seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) yet. Tracking of LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) recommendations started around May 2021.

mini_httpd mentions (1)

  • Making a microservice from a shell script
    The Web server needs to be lightweight and able to execute code. Mini_httpd is the perfect choice for this! - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) and mini_httpd, you can also consider the following products

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.

thttpd - thttpd is a simple, small, portable, fast, and secure HTTP server.

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

SimpleServer:WWW - One of the easiest to use and most versatile webservers out there.

lighttpd - A secure, fast, compliant, and very flexible web-server that has been optimized for high-performance environments

micro_httpd - micro_httpd is a very small Unix-based HTTP server.