Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

SimpleServer:WWW VS mini_httpd

Compare SimpleServer:WWW VS mini_httpd and see what are their differences

SimpleServer:WWW logo SimpleServer:WWW

One of the easiest to use and most versatile webservers out there.

mini_httpd logo mini_httpd

mini_httpd is a small HTTP server for low or medium traffic sites.
  • SimpleServer:WWW Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-27
  • mini_httpd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-06

SimpleServer:WWW features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    SimpleServer:WWW is user-friendly and easy to set up, making it ideal for beginners who need a simple web server solution.
  • Lightweight
    The software is lightweight and consumes minimal system resources, which is beneficial for running on older or less powerful hardware.
  • Freeware
    Being free to use, SimpleServer:WWW eliminates any cost barriers, allowing anyone to download and utilize it without financial investment.

Possible disadvantages of SimpleServer:WWW

  • Limited Features
    SimpleServer:WWW lacks many advanced features found in more robust web servers, such as detailed logging, extensive configuration options, and support for languages like PHP or databases.
  • Platform Dependency
    The software is designed for Windows operating systems, which limits its usage for users on other platforms like macOS or Linux.
  • Not Suitable for Production
    Due to its simplicity and lack of security features, SimpleServer:WWW is not recommended for use in a production environment where security and scalability are priorities.

mini_httpd features and specs

  • Lightweight
    mini_httpd is designed to be a minimal and lightweight HTTP server, which makes it consume very little system resources. This can be beneficial for systems with limited resources or for specific use-cases requiring simple functionalities.
  • Easy to configure
    With its minimalistic approach, mini_httpd is straightforward to configure and set up. This simplicity can be advantageous for users who need a basic server setup quickly.
  • Security focus
    mini_httpd offers certain security features like basic authentication and stringent simplicities which might result in fewer vulnerabilities compared to more complex servers.
  • Good for static content
    It is particularly well-suited for serving static content efficiently due to its simple architecture, which can be handy for websites that do not require dynamic content rendering.

Possible disadvantages of mini_httpd

  • Limited functionality
    Due to its minimalistic design, mini_httpd lacks many of the advanced features found in more comprehensive web servers, such as dynamic content handling and extensive configurability.
  • Lack of updates
    The development and update frequency of mini_httpd may not be as active as other popular web servers, potentially leading to security and compatibility concerns over time.
  • Not suitable for high traffic
    mini_httpd may not be ideal for handling high traffic loads or complex server-side operations, as it is not optimized for high performance under such conditions.
  • Limited community and support
    The user community and support options for mini_httpd are smaller compared to larger, more popular web servers, which can make troubleshooting and obtaining help more challenging.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to SimpleServer:WWW and mini_httpd)
Web Servers
36 36%
64% 64
Web And Application Servers
Application Server
41 41%
59% 59
Development Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using SimpleServer:WWW and mini_httpd. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, mini_httpd seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

SimpleServer:WWW mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of SimpleServer:WWW yet. Tracking of SimpleServer:WWW recommendations started around Mar 2021.

mini_httpd mentions (1)

  • Making a microservice from a shell script
    The Web server needs to be lightweight and able to execute code. Mini_httpd is the perfect choice for this! - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing SimpleServer:WWW and mini_httpd, you can also consider the following products

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

thttpd - thttpd is a simple, small, portable, fast, and secure HTTP server.

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

micro_httpd - micro_httpd is a very small Unix-based HTTP server.

Abyss Webserver - Aprelium - Home

SimpleHTTPServer - Serve a single directory over HTTP