Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

micro_httpd VS mini_httpd

Compare micro_httpd VS mini_httpd and see what are their differences

Proton Pass for Business
End-to-end encrypted password manager built for teams. Secure every login, share credentials safely, and keep all your business accounts protected with zero-knowledge encryption and Swiss privacy laws you can trust. featured
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Reviews
  3. ยป Alternatives

micro_httpd logo micro_httpd

micro_httpd is a very small Unix-based HTTP server.

mini_httpd logo mini_httpd

mini_httpd is a small HTTP server for low or medium traffic sites.
  • micro_httpd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-06
  • mini_httpd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-06

micro_httpd features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

mini_httpd features and specs

  • Lightweight
    mini_httpd is designed to be a minimal and lightweight HTTP server, which makes it consume very little system resources. This can be beneficial for systems with limited resources or for specific use-cases requiring simple functionalities.
  • Easy to configure
    With its minimalistic approach, mini_httpd is straightforward to configure and set up. This simplicity can be advantageous for users who need a basic server setup quickly.
  • Security focus
    mini_httpd offers certain security features like basic authentication and stringent simplicities which might result in fewer vulnerabilities compared to more complex servers.
  • Good for static content
    It is particularly well-suited for serving static content efficiently due to its simple architecture, which can be handy for websites that do not require dynamic content rendering.

Possible disadvantages of mini_httpd

  • Limited functionality
    Due to its minimalistic design, mini_httpd lacks many of the advanced features found in more comprehensive web servers, such as dynamic content handling and extensive configurability.
  • Lack of updates
    The development and update frequency of mini_httpd may not be as active as other popular web servers, potentially leading to security and compatibility concerns over time.
  • Not suitable for high traffic
    mini_httpd may not be ideal for handling high traffic loads or complex server-side operations, as it is not optimized for high performance under such conditions.
  • Limited community and support
    The user community and support options for mini_httpd are smaller compared to larger, more popular web servers, which can make troubleshooting and obtaining help more challenging.

Analysis of micro_httpd

Overall verdict

  • micro_httpd is a solid, minimalist HTTP server that excels at simplicity and low resource usage, making it a good choice for lightweight, non-critical serving needs, though it lacks the features and performance of full-scale servers.

Why this product is good

  • Extremely small and simple codebase that is easy to audit and understand
  • Runs from inetd/xinetd, so it has essentially no memory footprint when idle
  • Handles basic static file serving, directory listings, and common MIME types
  • Free and open source from a reputable author (Jef Poskanzer of acme.com)
  • Portable and easy to compile on most Unix-like systems

Recommended for

  • Serving simple static websites or files with minimal overhead
  • Embedded systems or resource-constrained environments
  • Educational purposes and learning how a basic HTTP server works
  • Low-traffic internal or hobbyist projects that don't need advanced features
  • Situations where a lightweight server run via inetd/xinetd is preferred over a persistent daemon

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to micro_httpd and mini_httpd)

micro_httpd

mini_httpd

Web And Application Servers
42 42%
Web And Application Servers
58% 58
Web Servers
0 0%
Web Servers
100% 100
VPN
100 100%
VPN
0% 0
Web Browsers
100 100%
Web Browsers
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using micro_httpd and mini_httpd. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, mini_httpd seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

micro_httpd mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of micro_httpd yet. Tracking of micro_httpd recommendations started around Mar 2021.

mini_httpd mentions (1)

  • Making a microservice from a shell script
    The Web server needs to be lightweight and able to execute code. Mini_httpd is the perfect choice for this! - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing micro_httpd and mini_httpd, you can also consider the following products

thttpd - thttpd is a simple, small, portable, fast, and secure HTTP server.

HTTP - is an application protocol for distributed, collaborative, and hypermedia information systems.

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.

Loading...