Software Alternatives & Startups

Keeping VS Device-Test

Compare Keeping VS Device-Test and see what are their differences

Keeping

Turns Google Workspace Into Your Team’s Help Desk

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Paid Free trial
Device-Test

Privacy-first device tests for microphones, cameras, screens, speakers, sensors, and more — right in your browser.

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Customer Support popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
89 vs 46

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Keeping
Device-Test
Website keeping.com device-test.com
Pricing
Paid Free trial Official pricing
—
Company Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2020 —
Listed in

About Keeping and Device-Test

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Keeping
Device-Test

Keeping is a shared inbox and helpdesk tool that lives inside Gmail, turning a shared mailbox like support@company(dot)com into a collaborative workspace where customer emails become trackable tickets with assignments, statuses, tags, and collision detection. It adds helpdesk power (templates,...

Read more about Keeping

No description of Device-Test yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Keeping 6 features
Device-Test 5 features
  • Shared Inbox
    Collaborate on your shared inbox from Gmail
  • Automated Workflows
    Tag, assign, and process email automatically
  • Lives in Gmail
    No extra tabs or apps to learn
  • Unlimited Mailboxes
    Add as many shared mailboxes as you like for free
  • Powerful Analytics
    Track first response time, volume, and measure your team
  • Collision Detection
    Never answer the same email twice
  • Cross-Device Testing
    Device-Test allows users to test websites and applications across a wide range of real devices, helping ensure compatibility and consistent user experience across different screen sizes and operating systems.
  • Real Device Access
    Provides access to actual physical devices rather than just emulators, which can lead to more accurate testing results for performance, touch interactions, and hardware-specific issues.
  • Time Efficiency
    Streamlines the testing process by allowing testers to check multiple devices without needing to physically own or manage each device, saving time in QA workflows.
  • Bug Detection
    Helps identify device-specific bugs and rendering issues that might not appear during standard desktop browser testing, improving overall software quality before release.
  • Remote Testing Capability
    Enables teams to conduct testing remotely, which is beneficial for distributed teams or those without in-house access to a large inventory of devices.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost Considerations
    Access to a broad range of real devices and premium testing features may come with subscription costs that can be a barrier for individual developers or small teams with limited budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    New users may need time to familiarize themselves with the platform's interface and testing tools, especially if they are not experienced with cross-device testing services.
  • Device Availability Limitations
    Depending on demand, certain popular or newer devices might have limited availability or longer wait times for access during peak testing periods.
  • Network Dependency
    Since testing is often conducted remotely, performance and reliability can be affected by internet connection quality, potentially causing lag or interruptions during test sessions.
  • Limited Customization
    Some advanced or highly specific testing scenarios may not be fully supported, requiring supplementary tools or manual testing for comprehensive coverage.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Keeping 2 videos + Add
Device-Test 0 videos + Add

DROP 2025 REVIEW | Keeping the Shot INTERESTING!

More videos

  • - I hate it, I'm keeping it. SMSL PL200T CD transport review.

No Device-Test videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Keeping
Device-Test
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Keeping and Device-Test.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Keeping's answer

Small and medium sized businesses

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Keeping's answer

Built in GCP (Google Cloud), with React, Elixir, and Phoenix.

What's the story behind your product?

Keeping's answer

Keeping was built to help teams manage customer support without leaving Gmail. It brings the structure of a help desk to shared inboxes, making it easier to assign, track, and respond to customer emails as a team.

User comments

Share your experience with using Keeping and Device-Test. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Keeping no reviews yet
Device-Test no reviews yet

We have no reviews of Device-Test yet. Be the first one to post

Alternatives to Keeping and Device-Test

When comparing Keeping and Device-Test, you can also consider the following products.