
TinyPNG
Squoosh
iLoveIMG
Caesium Image Compressor
Compressor.io
CloudConvert
iLovePDF
Faster web pages and apps.

TinyPNG
TinyJPG
Squoosh
Compresto
Zipic.app
Optimage
Squash
Batch image optimizer for Mac: compress, resize, crop, rename, and convert images in one pass, entirely offline.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, ImageOptim seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 54 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | imageoptim.com | imagecrush.io |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from Canada · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of ImageOptim yet.
ImageCrush is a native macOS app for batch processing images. Drop in files or whole folders and it compresses, resizes, crops, renames, and converts them in a single export, with every step running locally on the Mac. Nothing is uploaded. It imports JPG, PNG, WebP, HEIC, HEIF, and AVIF, and...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of ImageCrush yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
An absolute beginers guide to using Imageoptim on a Mac
More videos
No ImageCrush videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing ImageOptim and ImageCrush.
ImageCrush's answer:
ImageCrush runs the whole image prep job in one pass: crop, resize, convert, compress, rename, and watermark, all in a single batch export. Most Mac tools handle only one of those steps, so you end up chaining two or three apps together. Everything runs locally in a native SwiftUI app. Nothing is uploaded and there's no account. Export settings save as presets, and presets can be chained into sequences, so one export can produce several formats or sizes from the same batch (for example AVIF plus a WebP fallback).
ImageCrush's answer:
vs. ImageOptim: ImageOptim compresses well but can't resize, crop, or convert formats. ImageCrush does all of that in the same pass and exports to WebP, HEIC, and AVIF.
vs. TinyPNG and Squoosh: those are web tools, so your images get uploaded and you hit file limits or work one image at a time. ImageCrush processes whole folders offline with no limits.
vs. Compresto and other subscription apps: ImageCrush is a one-time purchase with no subscription. It's focused on images, with no video or PDF features you don't need.
vs. command-line tools: you get the same kind of control with drag-and-drop, a before/after comparison slider, and saved presets, and you don't have to write any scripts.
The 7-day free trial includes every feature, so you can test it on your own images first.
ImageCrush's answer:
Mac users who regularly prepare batches of images for the web or for delivery or just need to quickly convert one or two image in a hurry. That means web developers optimizing site assets, designers exporting deliverables at set sizes and formats, content creators and bloggers compressing photos before they upload them to a CMS or social media, and photographers resizing, renaming, and watermarking images for galleries and client proofs. Most of them repeat the same export settings across projects and want that to be one click instead of a multi-app routine.
ImageCrush's answer:
I kept repeating the same routine: drag images into ImageOptim to compress them, open Preview or Automator to resize them, then sometimes run a command-line tool to convert the format. That was three tools for what should be one step, and I had to redo it on every project. So I built ImageCrush to do the whole pipeline in one batch, natively on the Mac, with presets so I'd never have to set up the same export twice. Watermarking came later, after a family member who's a school photographer needed a faster way to mark proof galleries. ImageCrush is made by Rocket 5 Studios, a small independent studio.
ImageCrush's answer:
Swift and SwiftUI for a fully native macOS app (no Electron and no bundled command-line tools). Image processing uses Apple's ImageIO and Core Graphics frameworks, and WebP encoding uses Google's libwebp. Batches run in parallel with Swift concurrency on up to 8 threads. The app runs inside Apple's App Sandbox, is distributed through the Mac App Store, and runs natively on Apple Silicon and Intel (macOS 15.7 or later).
Share your experience with using ImageOptim and ImageCrush. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Compress Images: Use tools like TinyPNG or ImageOptim to reduce image sizes without sacrificing quality. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
Compress Images: Reduce file size while maintaining quality using image compression tools like TinyPNG or ImageOptim. Also, you can use Figma plugin: ExportX. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Compressing images: This technique reduces image size without compromising quality. You can achieve this using various image compression tools like TinyPNG or ImageOptim. These tools are specifically designed to manage multiple image... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Tracking ImageCrush since Oct 2026.
When comparing ImageOptim and ImageCrush, you can also consider the following products.

Make your website faster and save bandwidth. TinyPNG optimizes your PNG images by 50-80% while preserving full transparency!
Compare TinyPNG to ImageOptim or ImageCrush:

Compress and compare images with different codecs, right in your browser
Compare Squoosh to ImageOptim or ImageCrush:

Compress JPEG images with perfect quality and file size
Compare TinyJPG to ImageOptim or ImageCrush:

iLoveIMG is one of most powerful solution that comes with all the major tool you cloud want to edit images in bulk.
Compare iLoveIMG to ImageOptim or ImageCrush:

Compress your pictures up to 90% without visible quality loss.
Compare Caesium Image Compressor to ImageOptim or ImageCrush:

Offline file compression with up to 90% file size reduction without scarifying quality
Compare Compresto to ImageOptim or ImageCrush: