Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

HTTP VS mini_httpd

Compare HTTP VS mini_httpd and see what are their differences

Netumo
Ensure healthy website performance, uptime, and free from vulnerabilities. Automatic checks for SSL Certificates, domains and monitor issues with your websites all from one console and get instant notifications on any issues. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

HTTP logo HTTP

is an application protocol for distributed, collaborative, and hypermedia information systems.

mini_httpd logo mini_httpd

mini_httpd is a small HTTP server for low or medium traffic sites.
  • HTTP Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-21
  • mini_httpd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-06

HTTP features and specs

  • Simplicity
    HTTP is a simple protocol that is easy to understand and implement, making it accessible for developers and widely adopted across the web.
  • Statelessness
    HTTP is stateless, meaning each request from a client to server is independent, which simplifies server design and allows for easier scaling.
  • Flexibility
    HTTP is designed to transport different types of data and supports a variety of methods (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, etc.), making it flexible for various applications.
  • Extensibility
    HTTP supports extensions and new methods, headers, and functionalities can be added without breaking existing implementations.
  • Cacheability
    HTTP supports caching which can reduce latency and network congestion and improve efficiency by storing copies of resources closer to the client.

Possible disadvantages of HTTP

  • Overhead
    HTTP headers add overhead to requests and responses, which can impact performance, especially for small payloads.
  • Statelessness Complexity
    While statelessness simplifies the protocol, it complicates maintaining application state across requests, requiring additional mechanisms such as cookies or session tokens.
  • Security
    HTTP itself lacks encryption, making data vulnerable to interception and attack unless combined with SSL/TLS (as in HTTPS).
  • Performance Limitations
    HTTP/1.1 limits performance through sequential request-response patterns, leading to inefficiencies under high latency networks or with multiple small requests.
  • Resource Identification
    URLs can become complex and unwieldy when managing a large number of resources, leading to potential difficulties in resource management and organization.

mini_httpd features and specs

  • Lightweight
    mini_httpd is designed to be a minimal and lightweight HTTP server, which makes it consume very little system resources. This can be beneficial for systems with limited resources or for specific use-cases requiring simple functionalities.
  • Easy to configure
    With its minimalistic approach, mini_httpd is straightforward to configure and set up. This simplicity can be advantageous for users who need a basic server setup quickly.
  • Security focus
    mini_httpd offers certain security features like basic authentication and stringent simplicities which might result in fewer vulnerabilities compared to more complex servers.
  • Good for static content
    It is particularly well-suited for serving static content efficiently due to its simple architecture, which can be handy for websites that do not require dynamic content rendering.

Possible disadvantages of mini_httpd

  • Limited functionality
    Due to its minimalistic design, mini_httpd lacks many of the advanced features found in more comprehensive web servers, such as dynamic content handling and extensive configurability.
  • Lack of updates
    The development and update frequency of mini_httpd may not be as active as other popular web servers, potentially leading to security and compatibility concerns over time.
  • Not suitable for high traffic
    mini_httpd may not be ideal for handling high traffic loads or complex server-side operations, as it is not optimized for high performance under such conditions.
  • Limited community and support
    The user community and support options for mini_httpd are smaller compared to larger, more popular web servers, which can make troubleshooting and obtaining help more challenging.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to HTTP and mini_httpd)

HTTP

mini_httpd

VPN
100 100%
VPN
0% 0
Web Servers
30 30%
Web Servers
70% 70
Security
100 100%
Security
0% 0
Web And Application Servers
0 0%
Web And Application Servers
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using HTTP and mini_httpd. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, HTTP should be more popular than mini_httpd. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

HTTP mentions (8)

  • State management in Svelte apps
    HTTP was invented as a stateless protocol, which means that each request fully encapsulates all of the information necessary to return a correct response. So historically, web pages never had to worry about managing state - each request to a URL with parameters or with a form submission would receive a response with all of the HTML that the browser needed to render content. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Evolving the Web: Discovering the History of HTTP Versions
    HTTP/1.1 was such a game changer for the Internet that it works so well that even through two revisions, RFC 2616 published in June 1999 and RFC 7230– RFC 7235 published in June 2014, HTTP/1.1 was extremely stable until the release of HTTP/2.0 in 2014 — Nearly 18 years later. Before continuing to the next section about HTTP/2.0, let us revisit what journey HTTP/1.1 has been through. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Poll: Are client web requests sent to upstream servers or downstream servers?
    On the one hand, it just seems natural that "upstream" refers to the inbound request being sent from one system to another. It takes effort (connection pooling, throttling, retries, etc.) to make a request to an (upstream) dependency, just as it takes effort to swim upstream. The response is (usually) easy... Just return it... hence, "downstream". Recall the usual meaning of "upload" and "download". Upstream seems... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • How to cache TCP, SSL handshake on ALB?
    To me it sounds like you’ve not solved this as the config you’ve mentioned is about preventing “illegal” (none RFC7230 ) requests, it isn’t really related to the problem you posted. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • HTTP Protocol Overview
    The program you are using to send data to the server may or may not automatically determine the right content-type header for your data, and knowing how to set and check headers is an essential skill. To learn more about the HTTP protocol check out the MDN guide or read the official standard, RFC 7230. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
View more

mini_httpd mentions (1)

  • Making a microservice from a shell script
    The Web server needs to be lightweight and able to execute code. Mini_httpd is the perfect choice for this! - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing HTTP and mini_httpd, you can also consider the following products

thttpd - thttpd is a simple, small, portable, fast, and secure HTTP server.

Dat - Real-time replication and versioning for data sets

SimpleServer:WWW - One of the easiest to use and most versatile webservers out there.

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.

micro_httpd - micro_httpd is a very small Unix-based HTTP server.

ZeroNet - ZeroNet. Open, free and uncensorable websites, using Bitcoin cryptography and BitTorrent network. Download for Windows 9. 6MB · Unpack · Run ZeroNet. exe.

Loading...