Software Alternatives & Reviews

micro_httpd VS HTTP

Compare micro_httpd VS HTTP and see what are their differences

micro_httpd logo micro_httpd

micro_httpd is a very small Unix-based HTTP server.

HTTP logo HTTP

is an application protocol for distributed, collaborative, and hypermedia information systems.
  • micro_httpd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-06
  • HTTP Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-21

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to micro_httpd and HTTP)
Web And Application Servers
Web Servers
56 56%
44% 44
Application Server
57 57%
43% 43
Development Tools
50 50%
50% 50

User comments

Share your experience with using micro_httpd and HTTP. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, HTTP seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

micro_httpd mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of micro_httpd yet. Tracking of micro_httpd recommendations started around Mar 2021.

HTTP mentions (7)

  • Evolving the Web: Discovering the History of HTTP Versions
    HTTP/1.1 was such a game changer for the Internet that it works so well that even through two revisions, RFC 2616 published in June 1999 and RFC 7230– RFC 7235 published in June 2014, HTTP/1.1 was extremely stable until the release of HTTP/2.0 in 2014 — Nearly 18 years later. Before continuing to the next section about HTTP/2.0, let us revisit what journey HTTP/1.1 has been through. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Poll: Are client web requests sent to upstream servers or downstream servers?
    On the one hand, it just seems natural that "upstream" refers to the inbound request being sent from one system to another. It takes effort (connection pooling, throttling, retries, etc.) to make a request to an (upstream) dependency, just as it takes effort to swim upstream. The response is (usually) easy... Just return it... hence, "downstream". Recall the usual meaning of "upload" and "download". Upstream seems... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • How to cache TCP, SSL handshake on ALB?
    To me it sounds like you’ve not solved this as the config you’ve mentioned is about preventing “illegal” (none RFC7230 ) requests, it isn’t really related to the problem you posted. Source: over 2 years ago
  • HTTP Protocol Overview
    The program you are using to send data to the server may or may not automatically determine the right content-type header for your data, and knowing how to set and check headers is an essential skill. To learn more about the HTTP protocol check out the MDN guide or read the official standard, RFC 7230. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Show HN: Micro HTTP server in 22 lines of C
    It's neat, but I don't believe it is a compliant implementation of HTTP/1.1 (or 1.0). For example, it does not handle percent-encoded characters in the request URI.[1][2] [1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7230#section-3.1.1 [2]: https://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.0/spec.html#Request-URI. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing micro_httpd and HTTP, you can also consider the following products

mini_httpd - mini_httpd is a small HTTP server for low or medium traffic sites.

thttpd - thttpd is a simple, small, portable, fast, and secure HTTP server.

XAMPP - XAMPP is a free and open-source cross-platform web server that is primarily used when locally developing web applications.

IPFS - IPFS is the permanent web. A new peer-to-peer hypermedia protocol.

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.