Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Flaticon VS SOAPEngine

Compare Flaticon VS SOAPEngine and see what are their differences

Flaticon

A database of free vector icons.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
SOAPEngine

This generic SOAP client allows you to access web services using a your iOS app, Mac OS X app and AppleTV app. - priore/SOAPEngine

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
HIVLY.APP
Give Hivly an idea. Get a finished social post. Add a photo and one sentence. Hivly writes the caption, designs the post, and schedules it for Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Flaticon seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 27 times since March 2021.

social mentions
27 vs 0
Web Icons popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Flaticon
SOAPEngine
Website flaticon.com github.com
Pricing
Official pricing
—
Listed in
Web Icons Icon Fonts Vector Icons Web Fonts And Design Assets +1
Mobile Development

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Flaticon 7 features
SOAPEngine 4 features
  • Wide Selection
    Flaticon offers a vast collection of over 4 million icons, ensuring users can find icons for almost any need.
  • Quality
    Icons on Flaticon are professionally designed, ensuring high-quality visuals and a polished look for projects.
  • Customization
    Flaticon provides tools to customize icon colors and sizes directly on the platform, making it easy to match project designs.
  • Freemium Model
    Flaticon operates on a freemium model, offering a substantial number of icons for free which can be a significant advantage for budget-conscious users.
  • Formats
    Icons are available in various formats, including PNG, SVG, EPS, PSD, and BASE 64, providing flexible use across different platforms.
  • Ease of Use
    The website is user-friendly, with a straightforward search and filtering system, making it easy to find and download icons quickly.
  • Collection Functionality
    Users can create and manage collections of icons for better organization and easy access to frequently used icons.

Possible disadvantages

  • Attribution Requirement
    Free icons require attribution to the source, which can be inconvenient or aesthetically unappealing for some projects.
  • Subscription Cost
    The premium subscription, which removes attribution requirements and provides access to additional features, can be expensive for some users.
  • License Restrictions
    There may be licensing restrictions on certain icons, limiting their use in commercial projects without a premium subscription.
  • Variable Quality
    While many icons are of high quality, some may not meet professional standards, requiring users to sift through options to find the best ones.
  • Potential Overuse
    Popular icons might be overused in various projects, potentially making them less unique or impactful.
  • Dependency on Internet Connection
    Access to the platform and its features requires an internet connection, which can be a limitation in environments with poor connectivity.
  • Comprehensive SOAP Support
    SOAPEngine provides robust and thorough support for SOAP-based web services, making it easier for developers to integrate complex SOAP operations in their applications.
  • iOS and macOS Compatibility
    It is designed to work seamlessly with iOS and macOS platforms, ensuring that developers can build applications across Apple’s ecosystem using SOAP services.
  • Easy Integration
    SOAPEngine is relatively straightforward to integrate into existing projects, providing a variety of functionalities needed to quickly start consuming SOAP web services.
  • Automatic XML Parsing
    The library handles the parsing of XML responses automatically, which simplifies the developer's job by abstracting away the complexity of handling XML data.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited to Apple Platforms
    SOAPEngine is specifically designed for iOS and macOS, making it unsuitable for developers targeting cross-platform solutions that include Android or other systems.
  • Outdated Documentation
    Some users might find the documentation for SOAPEngine outdated or lacking clarity, potentially complicating the learning curve for new users.
  • Dependency on SOAP Protocol
    As SOAP is an older protocol compared to REST, developers using SOAPEngine are tied to using SOAP services, which might not be the best fit for newer web service designs.
  • Performance Overheads
    SOAP can introduce performance overheads due to its verbose nature and the XML format, potentially affecting the performance of applications using SOAPEngine.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Flaticon
SOAPEngine

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Flaticon is a good platform for individuals and professionals seeking diverse and customizable icon options. Its comprehensive library and user-friendly interface make it a valuable resource for graphic and web designers, developers, and educators.

Why this product is good

  • Flaticon is a popular resource for high-quality, customizable icons. It offers an extensive library with millions of icons available in various styles such as flat, outline, filled, and more. Users appreciate its ease of use, the ability to download icons in multiple formats like PNG and SVG, and its integration capabilities with tools like Adobe Illustrator and Microsoft PowerPoint. Additionally, the platform is continuously updated, ensuring a fresh variety of icon designs for different needs.

Recommended for

  • Graphic designers
  • Web developers
  • UI/UX designers
  • Content creators
  • Educators
  • Marketing professionals

Overall verdict

  • SOAPEngine is a solid choice for developers needing SOAP/XML web service integration in Apple ecosystem apps (iOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS), offering a mature, well-documented library that simplifies working with legacy SOAP-based backends without requiring extensive boilerplate code.

Why this product is good

  • Provides a straightforward Objective-C/Swift API for consuming SOAP web services, abstracting away much of the complexity of manual XML parsing and request construction
  • Supports multiple Apple platforms (iOS, macOS, watchOS, tvOS) making it versatile for cross-platform Apple development
  • Actively maintained with a track record on GitHub, giving developers confidence in its reliability
  • Handles common SOAP complexities like WSDL parsing, authentication, and complex data types
  • Good documentation and examples make it accessible for developers unfamiliar with SOAP intricacies
  • Reduces development time when integrating with older enterprise systems that still rely on SOAP APIs

Recommended for

  • iOS/macOS developers who need to integrate with legacy enterprise SOAP web services
  • Teams maintaining apps that connect to backend systems using WSDL-based services
  • Developers who want to avoid writing manual XML parsing and SOAP envelope construction from scratch
  • Projects requiring cross-platform support across multiple Apple devices with SOAP backend communication
  • Enterprise app developers working in industries (banking, healthcare, government) where SOAP remains a common integration standard

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Flaticon 3 videos + Add
SOAPEngine 0 videos + Add

How To Earn Passive Income With FlatIcon.Com!

More videos

  • - How to Use Flaticon as Webfont
  • - Free Vs Premium Account | Flaticon #06

No SOAPEngine videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Flaticon
SOAPEngine
100% 100%
Web Icons
0% 0%
0% 0%
Mobile Development
100% 100%
100% 100%
Vector Icons
0% 0%
100% 100%
Icon Fonts
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Flaticon and SOAPEngine. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Flaticon no reviews yet
SOAPEngine no reviews yet
  • 7 Best Free Icon Libraries
    www.atatus.com · Feb 2023

    In Flaticon, you will find vectors or embed icons that can be completely edited and used for any one or more of your personal or commercial projects. With over 2.3 million vector icons library organized into 51202...

  • 10 Best Fontello Alternatives 2021
    rigorousthemes.com · Oct 2021

    Flaticon is easily the largest collection of icons in the world and an amazing alternative to Fontello. It gives you over 5.7 million icons and stickers to choose from, all arranged into categories to enable you...

We have no reviews of SOAPEngine yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Flaticon 27 mentions
SOAPEngine 0 mentions
  • Cricut Joy Owners- I have questions...
    -Can I use non-Cricut images (i.e. Images from flaticon.com to make my stickers) using the Cricut software? Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Seeking Advice on Adding Illustrations to Self-Published Book: How Can I Obtain Them for Free?
    Its my first time to know about "flaticon.com". Thank you! I dont know how to use it. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Seeking Advice on Adding Illustrations to Self-Published Book: How Can I Obtain Them for Free?
    I'm confused - you're packaging your creative work to be purchased but expect others to hand over theirs for free? Because illustration is a very detailed skill. Or are you looking for a resource like flaticon.com? Source: over 3 years ago

View more

Tracking SOAPEngine since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Flaticon and SOAPEngine

When comparing Flaticon and SOAPEngine, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...