
Plausible.io
Google Analytics
Matomo
Simple Analytics
umami
Clicky
Mixpanel
Simple, trustworthy website analytics (finally)

GitHub Codespaces
Gitpod
replit
Coder
CodeSandbox
Cloud AI workstation that keeps your coding agents running after you disconnect.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Fathom Analytics seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 67 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | usefathom.com | holycode.cloud |
| Pricing | ||
| Company | Startup from Canada | Startup from the United States Β· 1 - 9 employees Β· 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Fathom Analytics yet.
HolyCode Cloud is a cloud AI workstation with 60+ tools already installed, built for running AI coding agents unattended. Hand off a task, close your laptop, and the work continues. Processes, files and terminal scrollback survive the disconnect, and the machine suspends when idle and resumes in...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
No features have been listed yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
FATHOM ANALYTICS REVIEW π INSTALL πΈ $100 (OPEN SOURCE)
More videos
No HolyCode videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0β100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Fathom Analytics and HolyCode.
HolyCode's answer:
The machine does not stop when you do. Most cloud dev environments are containers with an idle timer that reclaims them when nobody has typed for a while, which is exactly what a working unattended agent looks like to a timer. Here the workspace is a real VM with a persistent disk. Hand an agent a four-hour task, close your laptop, and the processes, files and terminal scrollback are still there when you come back. It suspends when idle and resumes in about a second, so always-on does not mean always-billing.
HolyCode's answer:
Three practical differences. First, nothing gets reclaimed for idleness, so long unattended agent runs actually finish. Second, every tier includes the full toolset. Tiers differ only by CPU, RAM and disk, so paying more buys horsepower rather than unlocking features. Third, you bring your own Anthropic, OpenAI or Gemini key and the provider bills you directly, with no markup on tokens.
Where it is not the right choice: if you want a free tier to try, there isn't one, because every account is a real VM that costs money from the first minute. There is a 7-day refund instead.
HolyCode's answer:
Developers running AI coding agents on real work rather than demos. Typically people who already pay for Claude, Codex or Gemini and have hit the point where the bottleneck is not the model but the machine underneath it. Many have tried tmux on a VPS and got tired of maintaining the VPS.
HolyCode's answer:
It started as an open-source Docker image for running coding agents with persistent state, which is still free and maintained at github.com/CoderLuii/HolyCode. The most common feedback was that persistence mattered most: sessions, settings and progress surviving a rebuild rather than starting over each time. The hosted version is that same image on a machine someone else maintains.
HolyCode's answer:
Fly.io machines with persistent volumes for the workspaces, Docker and Debian for the image, ttyd for the browser terminal, Node and React for the interface, and Cloudflare for the site and control plane.
Share your experience with using Fathom Analytics and HolyCode. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


This differentiates Fathom Analytics from alternatives that collect vast amounts of customersβ personal information.
Fathom Analytics is known for its emphasis on privacy, providing website analytics without invasive tracking methods. It maintains user data integrity, ensuring compliance with regulations like GDPR.
We have no reviews of HolyCode yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


AI referrals are human visits whose browser sends a recognizable AI-tool referrer. Fathom's current site says teams can explore AI referrals and filter the dashboard to see what those visitors do. Give it credit for that; this is no... - Source: dev.to / 17 days ago
So this post is about something I've been chewing on for months but finally moved on: ripping Google Analytics out of three side projects and picking a privacy-focused alternative. Specifically, I'll compare Umami, Plausible, and Fathom... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Fathom is the most "premium" option. No self-hosted version β it's a paid product, and they lean into that. The upside is it just works, with excellent uptime and performance. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Tracking HolyCode since Aug 2026.
When comparing Fathom Analytics and HolyCode, you can also consider the following products.

Plausible Analytics is a simple, open-source, lightweight (< 1 KB) and privacy-friendly web analytics alternative to Google Analytics. Made and hosted in the EU, powered by European-owned cloud infrastructure πͺπΊ
Compare Plausible.io to Fathom Analytics or HolyCode:

GItHub Codespaces is a hosted remote coding environment by GitHub based on Visual Studio Codespaces integrated directly for GitHub.
Compare GitHub Codespaces to Fathom Analytics or HolyCode:

Improve your website to increase conversions, improve the user experience, and make more money using Google Analytics. Measure, understand and quantify engagement on your site with customized and in-depth reports.
Compare Google Analytics to Fathom Analytics or HolyCode:


Matomo is an open-source web analytics platform
Compare Matomo to Fathom Analytics or HolyCode:

Code, create, andlearn together. Use our free, collaborative, in-browser IDE to code in 50+ languages β without spending a second on setup.
Compare replit to Fathom Analytics or HolyCode: