
CSS Scan
Hoverify
Shuffle for Tailwind CSS
CSS Scan Pro
CSS Grab n' Go Editor
Site Palette
Devsync
No code CSS editor for any website.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Apollo.io seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 69 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | eazycss.com | apollo.io |
| Pricing | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from the United States |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of EazyCSS yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
EazyCSS ProductHunt
Free software to find email addresses - apollo.io review
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using EazyCSS and Apollo.io. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of EazyCSS yet. Be the first one to post
What is the best AI prospecting tool for B2B sales in 2026? The best tool depends on your team's specific situation. toflow.ai is a strong fit for multi-channel outreach across email, LinkedIn, and WhatsApp, and is...
We use Apollo with our Sales and BDR team to manage our cold outreach. The strength of the platform is the sequences and cadences that you can set up. Compared to other tools we have used in the past like Salesloft...
FAQWhat’s better than Apollo.io?What Apollo.io competitors are better for lead generation? What is Apollo.io used for?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking EazyCSS since Apr 2022.
Personal email domains destroy this. Clearbit's Enrichment API returns a null company when it hits gmail.com. Apollo routes personal domains straight to a consumer bucket and skips B2B fields entirely. Even PDL's /person/enrich endpoint... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
A few things worth flagging: PDL beats Clearbit's historical rates for US and Western European companies, but drops to ~52% match rate for Japan and South Korea specifically. Apollo underperforms on raw company matching but returns... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
One thing comparison guides consistently get wrong: Clay is not an enrichment API. It's a waterfall orchestration tool that calls People Data Labs, Apollo, Clearbit, and others in sequence for you. It's useful, but it adds 2–8 seconds of... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
When comparing EazyCSS and Apollo.io, you can also consider the following products.

Instantly check or copy computed CSS from any element for only ~95$
Compare CSS Scan to EazyCSS or Apollo.io:

ZoomInfo is a B2B database providing detailed business information on people and companies.
Compare ZoomInfo to EazyCSS or Apollo.io:

All-in-one browser extension to improve your web dev experience.
Compare Hoverify to EazyCSS or Apollo.io:


Tailwind CSS editor for busy developers
Compare Shuffle for Tailwind CSS to EazyCSS or Apollo.io:

Find all the email addresses related to a domain
Compare Hunter.io to EazyCSS or Apollo.io: