ZoomInfo Reviews

1. louism

   10 months ago
   Powerful platform for B2b sales & marketing teams.

   ZoomInfo makes it much easier to identify decision-makers, prioritize high-value accounts, and keep pipelies moving. With powerful AI automation and high-quality data, it's an all-in-one solution for sales, marketing, and RevOPs teams who want to save time and drive revenue growth.

   👍 Pros:    Clean and intuitive dashboard|Strong automation features

   👎 Cons:    Pricing feel high for smaller business
2. Simon

   · Working at Simon · over 3 years ago
   Good, but Not the Best B2B Database

   As a B2B database, ZoomInfo certainly has a lot to offer. Its detailed business information on people and companies is impressive, and I've found it to be a useful resource for researching potential clients and partners.

   However, I do have a few criticisms of the product. Firstly, its pricing is quite steep, especially compared to other B2B databases on the market. This makes it difficult for smaller businesses or startups to justify the cost. Additionally, while the information on ZoomInfo is generally accurate and up-to-date, I have come across a few instances where the information was incomplete or outdated.

   Despite these drawbacks, ZoomInfo is still a good resource for business information. It just might not be the best option out there. If you're willing to pay for a premium service, then ZoomInfo could be worth considering. However, if you're looking for more cost-effective alternatives, there are several options to consider.

   🏁 Competitors: LinkedIn Sales Navigator

   👍 Pros:    Detailed|Accurate

   👎 Cons:    Expensive|Incomplete

D (Programming Language) Reviews

ZoomInfo mentions (8)

• Enriching Free Trial Signups: The PLG Data Stack for Turning Inbound Users Into Qualified Pipeline

  Skip ZoomInfo for this use case. It's enterprise-contract priced, built for outbound prospecting from company lists, and adds zero value for personal email resolution. Same story with Lusha — excellent for Chrome extension-style lookups starting from a LinkedIn profile, wrong tool for an automated inbound pipeline. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

• How to Build an OSINT-Powered B2B Prospecting Workflow in 2026 (Without Getting Banned)

  Most SDR stacks start with a contact database — ZoomInfo, Apollo, or Lusha — and treat enrichment as a one-time step at the top of the funnel. The problem: these databases are 3–18 months stale on average. Job titles change. Companies restructure. Decision-makers who were Director of Engineering in Q1 are VP by Q3. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• LinkedIn Scraping Is Dead: 5 Legal, ToS-Safe Alternatives That Actually Work in 2026

  Kaspr is the most LinkedIn-native option on this list. The Chrome extension sits on LinkedIn profiles and exports contact data directly — phone numbers, emails, and CRM sync. 120M+ European contacts is their differentiator; US coverage is noticeably thinner. Starting at $74/month, it's not cheap for light usage, but teams running 200+ LinkedIn outreach touches per month will find the unit economics work. Kaspr is... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Vendor annoyance phone calls

  For the phone calls - there's a decent chance they got your number from zoominfo.com - you can go there and request to be removed. Source: about 3 years ago

• Forward spam emails back to sender!

  I just found a few data collator sites, zoominfo.com and signalhire.com are just two - they seem to scrape sites like Linkedin etc and collate everything. Personal numbers can be found pretty easily, if you've ever signed up for a business identification number it could be there, could be in a data leak somewhere - these companies are pretty shady and will buy data from places to just get a lead. Source: over 3 years ago

D (Programming Language) mentions (60)

• Ask HN: What is your (AI) dev tech stack / workflow? (June 2026)

  I've spent 2 weeks (2-4h per day) to make D language[1] version of Sciter SDK [2] Choice of AI "tooling" was by accident - typed something like "how to define copy constructor in D for custom structure" in Microsoft's Copilot in Edge browser that gives context for AI. The answer was good enough for me and so I went with it further. [1] D language HQ : https://dlang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

• Rue: Higher level than Rust, lower level than Go

  > Mostly, I am not really trying to compete with C/C++/Rust on speed, but I'm not going to add a GC either. So I'm somewhere in there. Out of curiosity, how would you compare the goals of Rue with something like D[0] or one of the ML-based languages such as OCaml[1]? 0 - https://dlang.org/ 1 - https://ocaml.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

• Pony: An actor-model, capabilities-secure, high-performance programming language

  The D language home page has something similar with a drop down with code examples https://dlang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago

• Show HN: D++lang – A new systems programming language with Python-like syntax

  What is this? There's a lot of red flags here. * The name "D" for a programming language was taken in 1999: https://dlang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• Koto Programming Language

  >For me the biggest gap in programming languages is a rust like language with a garbage collector, instead of a borrow checker. I cannot agree more that's the much needed sweet spot/Goldilock/etc. Personally I have been advocating this approach for some times. Apparently the language is already widely available and currently has stable and wide compiler support including the venerable GNU compiler suite (GDC). It... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago