Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Xojo VS Continue.dev

Compare Xojo VS Continue.dev and see what are their differences

JackHamr
AI agents that spec, build, test, and ship code โ€” with voice chat, deep GitHub integration, and zero LLM markup. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Xojo logo Xojo

Real Software and Real Studio are now Xojo.

Continue.dev logo Continue.dev

Continue is the leading open-source AI code assistant. You can connect any models and any context to build custom autocomplete and chat experiences inside VS Code and JetBrains.
  • Xojo Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-28
Not present

Xojo features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Development
    Xojo allows users to create native applications for multiple platforms including Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, and the web from a single codebase. This simplifies development and reduces the effort required to maintain different versions of the same app.
  • Rapid Application Development
    The Visual IDE (Integrated Development Environment) provided by Xojo enables rapid prototyping and development. Users can drag and drop UI elements, which makes it easy to create complex user interfaces quickly.
  • Versatile Language Support
    Xojo uses a unique language that combines elements from various programming languages. It is straightforward enough for beginners to pick up while still being powerful for more advanced tasks.
  • Active Community and Support
    Xojo has a vibrant community and offers various forms of support, including forums, documentation, and dedicated customer service. This can be very beneficial for troubleshooting and learning best practices.
  • Regular Updates
    The platform receives frequent updates, which include new features, bug fixes, and improvements. This ensures that developers have access to the latest tools and functionalities.

Possible disadvantages of Xojo

  • Performance Limitations
    While Xojo is powerful for developing various applications, it may not be the best choice for highly performance-intensive applications, particularly those requiring extensive optimization.
  • Licensing Costs
    Xojo's licensing model can be considered expensive, especially for individual developers or small teams. The cost may be a barrier for some users considering long-term use.
  • Limited Third-Party Integrations
    Compared to more widely-adopted development platforms, Xojo has fewer third-party libraries and integrations. This limitation can make it harder to extend the platform with additional functionalities.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its simplicity, there is still a learning curve associated with mastering Xojo, especially for developers accustomed to more conventional programming languages. This may require additional time and resources for training.
  • Less Popular
    Xojo is not as widely used as some other development platforms, which means there are fewer resources, tutorials, and third-party tools available. This could be a limiting factor for some developers.

Continue.dev features and specs

  • Seamless Integration
    Continue.dev offers seamless integration with popular Integrated Development Environments (IDEs), allowing users to enhance their existing workflows without substantial changes.
  • Code Generation
    It provides robust code generation features that can increase productivity by automating repetitive coding tasks, saving developers time and effort.
  • Ease of Use
    The platform's user-friendly interface and clear documentation make it easy for developers to get started quickly, even with limited prior experience.
  • Community Support
    Continue.dev has an active community and support system, which can help users troubleshoot issues and share best practices.
  • Real-time Collaboration
    The platform supports real-time collaboration features that can help teams work together more efficiently, facilitating better communication and project management.

Possible disadvantages of Continue.dev

  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, there is still a learning curve for new users, particularly for those unfamiliar with AI-assisted development tools.
  • Dependency on IDE
    The performance and utility of Continue.dev heavily depend on its integration with specific IDEs, which might not suit developers using other environments.
  • Subscription Costs
    Access to the full feature set may require a subscription, which might be a consideration for small teams or individual developers with limited budgets.
  • Privacy Concerns
    As with many AI-driven tools, there could be privacy concerns related to code and data sharing, which organizations need to manage carefully.
  • Limited Offline Functionality
    The tool may offer limited functionality when offline, which could be a drawback for developers working in environments with unstable internet access.

Analysis of Xojo

Overall verdict

  • Xojo can be a good choice for individuals and small businesses looking to develop cross-platform applications quickly without deep programming expertise. However, for more complex projects or those requiring extensive customization, other more robust languages and environments might be more suitable.

Why this product is good

  • Xojo is an integrated development environment (IDE) and programming language known for its simplicity and ability to target multiple platforms including macOS, Windows, Linux, web, iOS, and Raspberry Pi. It is appreciated for its ease of use, especially for beginners and those who need to rapidly prototype applications.

Recommended for

  • Beginners in programming
  • Small businesses looking for rapid application development
  • Developers needing to create prototypes quickly
  • Users wanting to deploy applications across multiple platforms with minimal coding

Xojo videos

+ Add

Try Xojo

More videos:

  • Review - What is Xojo?
  • Review - Xojo 2020 with Geoff Perlman

Continue.dev videos

+ Add

CONTINUE.DEV HONEST REVIEW: WORTH IT AI CODE ASSISTANT?

More videos:

  • Review - Continue.dev vs. Cline: The Best Coding Assistant for VSCode?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Xojo and Continue.dev)

Xojo

Continue.dev

IDE
100 100%
IDE
0% 0
AI
0 0%
AI
100% 100
Text Editors
100 100%
Text Editors
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Xojo and Continue.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Xojo and Continue.dev

Xojo Reviews

12 Best Frameworks and Toolkits to Build Desktop Applications
If you are looking for a beginner-friendly framework, Xojo can be a good option. It is a cross-platform application development framework with a simple drag-and-drop user interface. Developers with basic web development skills can easily use this platform to build desktop applications.
Source: geekflare.com
Frameworks & Tools to Develop Cross-Platform Desktop Apps โ€“ Best of
Xojo is a programming environment available for Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. With its Xojo IDE, it provides an easy-to-use, drag-and-drop UI builder, and its own language for coding your application. The IDE also allows testing the app immediately, and when itโ€™s ready, it converts this app to run on multiple platforms.
Source: www.hongkiat.com

Continue.dev Reviews

We have no reviews of Continue.dev yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Xojo should be more popular than Continue.dev. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Xojo mentions (6)

  • Ask HN: What Toolchains Are People Using for Desktop App Development in 2025?
    I have used Xojo before and it is great. It is REALbasic rebranded and has been around for three decades. I used it years ago to write a LIMS interface (pre-Web 2.0). You can download the IDE and use it for free for Linux and Raspberry Pi projects. https://xojo.com. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
  • PysimpleGUI
    Xojo is basically VB6's spiritual successor. https://xojo.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Why did Visual Basic die?
    For anyone looking for a modern alternative to Visual Basic, you might want to take a look at Xojo. Xojo's a rapid application development platform (both a language and an IDE) that you can use to develop desktop apps (for macOS, Windows, Linux), Web apps, mobile apps (for iOS and Android), as well as console apps. It's been around for more than 20 years, and some of you might remember it from back when it was... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • Small Visual Basic
    I really recommend Xojo[1] (formally RealBasic). Itโ€™s like a modern VB6 but runs on macOS, Windows and many flavours of Linux. It has very polished drag and drop UI editor. Iโ€™ve been developing with it for over 20 years and my 10 year old daughter is now learning programming with it. You can create and debug apps for free and only need a license to deploy an app as a binary so itโ€™s ideal to learn with. Heck, it... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Do any of you code with/on steno?
    I have yet to get into actual programming, but when I do, it will probably be with the multi-platform programming environment called XoJo. Source: almost 4 years ago
View more

Continue.dev mentions (3)

  • Feeding BrassCoders Output to Any AI Coding Assistant
    Check Continue's documentation for the current @file syntax in your version, as context-provider behavior has evolved across releases. - Source: dev.to / 15 days ago
  • Using GitHub MCP With Continue to Review PRs and Issues 5 Faster
    # This is an example configuration file # To learn more, see the full config.yaml reference: https://docs.continue.dev/reference Name: Example Config Version: 1.0.0 Schema: v1 # Define which models can be used # https://docs.continue.dev/customization/models Models: - name: my gpt-5 provider: openai model: gpt-5 apiKey: YOUR_OPENAI_API_KEY_HERE - uses: ollama/qwen2.5-coder-7b - uses:... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • When AI Assistants Meet Your VS Code Setup
    The Setup Reality: Installing Continue was straightforward since it functions as VS Code extension. Thereโ€™s a bit of a jump to configure. I was using Agent mode, and some of the settings have to be changed on the web UI. Right now, Iโ€™m using two different assistants: one for my Jekyll project and the other for my Astro projects. You can customize your assistant with what they call blocks by setting things like... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Xojo and Continue.dev, you can also consider the following products

PureBasic - Fantaisie Software Official WebSite. PureBasic - Feel The Pure Power. PureBasic is a programming language based on established BASIC rules.

Cursor - The AI-first Code Editor. Build software faster in an editor designed for pair-programming with AI.

B4X - Cross platform development tools for native iOS, Android, desktop and server applications.

Windsurf Editor - Tomorrow's editor, today. Windsurf Editor is the first AI agent-powered IDE that keeps developers in the flow. Available today on Mac, Windows, and Linux.

Flutter - Build beautiful native apps in record time ๐Ÿš€

Claude Code - Transform hours of debugging into seconds with a single command. Experience coding at thought-speed with Claude's AI that understands your entire codebaseโ€”no more context switching, just breakthrough results.

Loading...