Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Cursor VS Continue.dev

Compare Cursor VS Continue.dev and see what are their differences

Cursor logo Cursor

The AI-first Code Editor. Build software faster in an editor designed for pair-programming with AI.

Continue.dev logo Continue.dev

Continue is the leading open-source AI code assistant. You can connect any models and any context to build custom autocomplete and chat experiences inside VS Code and JetBrains.
  • Cursor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-02-04
Not present

Cursor features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Cursor offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible for users of all tech backgrounds.
  • Comprehensive Analytics
    Provides robust analytics tools that allow users to gain insights and make data-driven decisions effectively.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Easily integrates with a wide range of third-party applications, enhancing its functionality and usability.
  • Customizability
    Offers customization options that allow users to tailor the platform to meet their specific needs and requirements.
  • Real-Time Collaboration
    Facilitates real-time collaboration among team members, improving communication and productivity.

Possible disadvantages of Cursor

  • Cost
    May be expensive for small businesses or individual users, which could limit accessibility.
  • Complex Setup
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex and time-consuming, requiring technical expertise.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, some advanced features may have a steep learning curve.
  • Dependence on Integrations
    While integrations are a strength, the platform's full potential might only be realized if used with specific third-party tools.
  • Privacy Concerns
    Users might have privacy concerns regarding data handling, especially when integrated with numerous external services.

Continue.dev features and specs

  • Seamless Integration
    Continue.dev offers seamless integration with popular Integrated Development Environments (IDEs), allowing users to enhance their existing workflows without substantial changes.
  • Code Generation
    It provides robust code generation features that can increase productivity by automating repetitive coding tasks, saving developers time and effort.
  • Ease of Use
    The platform's user-friendly interface and clear documentation make it easy for developers to get started quickly, even with limited prior experience.
  • Community Support
    Continue.dev has an active community and support system, which can help users troubleshoot issues and share best practices.
  • Real-time Collaboration
    The platform supports real-time collaboration features that can help teams work together more efficiently, facilitating better communication and project management.

Possible disadvantages of Continue.dev

  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, there is still a learning curve for new users, particularly for those unfamiliar with AI-assisted development tools.
  • Dependency on IDE
    The performance and utility of Continue.dev heavily depend on its integration with specific IDEs, which might not suit developers using other environments.
  • Subscription Costs
    Access to the full feature set may require a subscription, which might be a consideration for small teams or individual developers with limited budgets.
  • Privacy Concerns
    As with many AI-driven tools, there could be privacy concerns related to code and data sharing, which organizations need to manage carefully.
  • Limited Offline Functionality
    The tool may offer limited functionality when offline, which could be a drawback for developers working in environments with unstable internet access.

Analysis of Cursor

Overall verdict

  • Cursor is a valuable tool for businesses seeking to streamline their customer management processes. It is particularly praised for its ease of use, flexible features, and ability to enhance productivity by automating repetitive tasks.

Why this product is good

  • Cursor (cursor.com) is considered a good platform because it offers users a robust framework for managing customer interactions and data. It integrates well with other software solutions, provides intuitive user interfaces, and comes with analytical tools that help in making informed business decisions.

Recommended for

    Cursor is recommended for small to medium-sized businesses looking for an efficient customer relationship management (CRM) solution. It's ideal for teams that need an integrated system to manage customer interactions, support operations, and sales tracking.

Cursor videos

Why I QUIT VS Code for Cursor AI (Honest Review + Beginner Tutorial)

More videos:

  • Review - I Finally Tried The AI-Powered VS Code Killer | Cursor IDE Review
  • Review - Github Copilot vs Cursor: which AI coding assistant is better?

Continue.dev videos

CONTINUE.DEV HONEST REVIEW: WORTH IT AI CODE ASSISTANT?

More videos:

  • Review - Continue.dev vs. Cline: The Best Coding Assistant for VSCode?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cursor and Continue.dev)
AI
91 91%
9% 9
Developer Tools
89 89%
11% 11
Coding
78 78%
22% 22
AI Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Cursor and Continue.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Cursor and Continue.dev

Cursor Reviews

Cursor vs Windsurf vs GitHub Copilot
The gap between Cursor and Windsurf is narrow and closing fast. While Cursor wins for now based on slightly better overall results and stability, Windsurf's rapid development and polished experience make it a compelling alternative that could easily take the lead with a few refinements. If you want to really push the boundaries of what AI can do for your coding, Cursor is...
Source: www.builder.io
Cursor vs GitHub Copilot
Cursor's tab completion is pretty wild. It'll suggest multiple lines of code, and it's looking at your whole project to make those suggestions. For TypeScript and Python files - when Tab suggests an unimported symbol, Cursor will auto-import it to your current file. Plus, it even tries to guess where you're going to edit next.
Source: www.builder.io

Continue.dev Reviews

We have no reviews of Continue.dev yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cursor should be more popular than Continue.dev. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Cursor mentions (5)

  • Use LLM for EDA licenses analysis
    Here is an example how to connect Prometheus DB to Cursor AI code editor. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Day 1 of experimenting with open source (and I'm already confused)
    What information do I need to give Cursor or any IDE to not completely mess things up? - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • AI user interface patterns
    In the wild: Code assistance plug-ins in IDEs (such as Genie AI, Amazon Q, CodeGPT, Codeium and Llama Coder) and dedicated IDEs (such as Cursor). Email and text message completion, as seen in Gmail, LinkedIn messaging and Apple Messages. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • TailwindCSS: A Game-Changer for AI-Driven Code Generation and Design Systems
    Tools like Cursor are taking this to the next level. Cursor is an AI-powered code editor that integrates seamlessly with frameworks like TailwindCSS, allowing developers to generate code snippets, refactor existing code, and even get explanations about complex codebases. When used in conjunction with TailwindCSS, Cursor can significantly speed up the development process, suggesting appropriate utility classes and... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • What is this reality where everyone can build an app
    Weโ€™ve been talking for a while about how neural networks will replace (and are replacing, to some extent) developers. This change is expected in the foreseeable future โ€” not tomorrow, as NVIDIAโ€™s CEO might hope, but I bet Iโ€™ll witness it in my lifetime. Twenty years ago, website creation required a skillset possessed by a small circle of people. Now, weโ€™re seeing that virtually anyone can build a basic app with... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

Continue.dev mentions (1)

  • When AI Assistants Meet Your VS Code Setup
    The Setup Reality: Installing Continue was straightforward since it functions as VS Code extension. Thereโ€™s a bit of a jump to configure. I was using Agent mode, and some of the settings have to be changed on the web UI. Right now, Iโ€™m using two different assistants: one for my Jekyll project and the other for my Astro projects. You can customize your assistant with what they call blocks by setting things like... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cursor and Continue.dev, you can also consider the following products

GitHub Copilot - Your AI pair programmer. With GitHub Copilot, get suggestions for whole lines or entire functions right inside your editor.

Qwen3Coder.org - Explore Qwen3 Coder, Alibaba Cloud's advanced AI code generation model. Learn about its features, performance benchmarks, and how to use this powerful, open-source tool for development.

Windsurf Editor - Tomorrow's editor, today. Windsurf Editor is the first AI agent-powered IDE that keeps developers in the flow. Available today on Mac, Windows, and Linux.

Depth AI - AI that deeply understands your codebase

PaletAI - Create, play, and share AI-generated mobile games, no coding required.

Claude Code - Transform hours of debugging into seconds with a single command. Experience coding at thought-speed with Claude's AI that understands your entire codebaseโ€”no more context switching, just breakthrough results.