Software Alternatives & Startups

Working Copy VS FinderGit

Compare Working Copy VS FinderGit and see what are their differences

Working Copy

The powerful Git client for iOS

Rating
0 reviews
FinderGit

Every Git repo on your Mac: browse, commit, review, clean

No screenshot yet
Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Working Copy seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 18 times since March 2021.

social mentions
18 vs 0
Git popularity
90% vs 10%
alternatives listed
62 vs 6

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Working Copy
FinderGit
Website workingcopyapp.com findergit.app
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Working Copy 6 features
FinderGit 5 features
  • User Interface
    Working Copy features an intuitive and user-friendly interface that makes navigating through repositories, committing changes, and pushing updates seamless even for beginners.
  • File Management
    It offers robust file management capabilities, allowing users to easily view, edit, and manage files directly within the app, a crucial feature for developers on the go.
  • Integration
    Working Copy integrates well with other iOS apps and services, enabling smooth workflow transitions between different tools and platforms.
  • Support for Multiple Repositories
    The app supports multiple repositories, which is beneficial for developers who work on various projects simultaneously.
  • Offline Capabilities
    Working Copy allows users to work offline with local repositories, syncing changes when back online, enabling productivity in environments without internet access.
  • SSH Key Management
    It includes robust SSH key management, ensuring secure and streamlined authentication for remote repository access.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    While the basic features are free, some advanced functionalities require a paid subscription, which might be a drawback for budget-conscious users.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, the abundance of features can be overwhelming for new users, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Limited Platform
    The app is available exclusively for iOS, which restricts accessibility for developers who use other platforms like Android or Windows.
  • Performance with Large Repositories
    Some users report performance issues when handling very large repositories, affecting the app's efficiency in such scenarios.
  • Editing Capabilities
    While it offers basic editing functionalities, Working Copy lacks some of the more advanced code editing features found in dedicated code editors.
  • Git in Finder workflow
    Going by the name, FinderGit appears to bring Git status and actions into the macOS Finder. I couldn't verify this from the site, so check it yourself. If true, you could manage repositories without switching to a terminal or a separate Git client.
  • Lower barrier for non-terminal users
    A Finder-based interface would suit designers, writers and beginners who want version control without memorizing commands. This is inferred from the product's name and positioning, not confirmed.
  • Native-feeling experience
    A tool built around Finder would likely feel familiar to Mac users and need little setup. Confirm this on the official site.
  • Quick visibility of changes
    Tools of this type usually show file status such as modified, staged or untracked right in the file browser. That makes it quick to see what changed. Check the features page to see whether FinderGit does this.
  • Possible time savings
    Common actions like commit, pull and push could be a few clicks away, which cuts context switching for simple tasks. How much this helps depends on the app's actual features.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited verified information
    I couldn't verify FinderGit's current features, pricing or reviews, so these points are inferred from its name and category. Check findergit.app and independent reviews before relying on them.
  • Likely platform-limited
    A Finder-integrated tool is probably macOS-only, so it won't help Windows or Linux users or mixed-OS teams.
  • May not cover advanced Git workflows
    GUI and file-manager integrations often handle basics well but struggle with rebasing, complex merges, conflict resolution or submodules. Power users may still need the CLI or a full Git client.
  • Possible cost or licensing
    A niche utility may be paid, subscription-based or limited in its free tier. Check the pricing page to see whether it is worth it compared with free options like GitHub Desktop, Fork or the CLI.
  • Smaller ecosystem and support
    A newer or niche app may have less documentation, fewer community resources and slower updates than established Git clients. That could make troubleshooting harder.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Working Copy
FinderGit

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Working Copy is considered a good app for developers who need a mobile solution for managing Git repositories. Its reliability and feature set make it a vital tool for those who prefer or need to work from iOS devices.

Why this product is good

  • Working Copy is highly regarded for its robust Git support on iOS devices, offering a wide range of features that facilitate efficient version control. It supports various Git operations like cloning, committing, pushing, and pulling straight from an iPhone or iPad. The app is praised for its intuitive user interface, seamless integration with cloud services, and its efficient use of device capabilities, making it a powerful tool for developers who need to manage their repositories on the go.

Recommended for

  • Developers who frequently work on Git repositories and need mobile access.
  • iOS users who require a robust version control tool.
  • Teams that collaborate on projects remotely and move between desktop and mobile environments.

No analysis of FinderGit yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Working Copy 2 videos + Add
FinderGit 0 videos + Add

Using Git on iPad with Textastic and Working Copy

More videos

  • - Obsidian: Capture on iOS with Drafts and Working Copy - Effective Remote Work

No FinderGit videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Working Copy
FinderGit
90% 90%
Git
10% 10%
88% 88%
12% 12%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Working Copy and FinderGit. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Working Copy 18 mentions
FinderGit 0 mentions
  • 37signals Introduces Once – One time payment software
    Even better is the licensing model where you can keep using the version as-is after the subscription ends. You just don't get any new features. It's even possible to do on iOS, as Working Copy [0] is doing it. (You also get all the bug... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • How I set up an almost fully automatic free Sync between Win, Android, iOS using Git.
    Yeah, Working Copy is a proper Git front-end which helps do safe syncing, via features such as:. Source: over 3 years ago
  • [Newbie] How could I prevent git conflicts and make this system better?
    So I have a laptop and a iPhone. On laptop I have the Obsidian.md desktop app, on iPhone I have the app and Working Copy app too. This is all for syncing my notes. Source: almost 4 years ago

View more

Tracking FinderGit since Oct 2026.

Alternatives to Working Copy and FinderGit

When comparing Working Copy and FinderGit, you can also consider the following products.