TradingView VS git-sizer

• User-friendly Interface
  TradingView offers a clean and intuitive interface that is easy for both beginners and experienced traders to navigate.
• Comprehensive Charting Tools
  The platform provides a wide range of charting tools, including indicators, drawing tools, and customizable chart types to conduct in-depth technical analysis.
• Cloud-based Platform
  Being cloud-based, TradingView allows users to access their charts and settings from any device with internet access, ensuring flexibility and convenience.
• Social Community
  TradingView has a strong community aspect where users can share ideas, analysis, and strategies, fostering a collaborative environment.
• Data Coverage
  The platform supports data from a variety of global markets, including stocks, forex, cryptocurrencies, and commodities, providing broad market coverage.
• Pine Script
  TradingView offers its own scripting language, Pine Script, which allows users to create custom indicators and strategies.

Possible disadvantages

• Subscription Cost
  While TradingView offers a free tier, advanced features and additional data require a subscription that may be costly for some users.
• Limited Broker Integration
  The number of brokers integrated with TradingView for direct trading is limited, which may be a drawback for users whose preferred brokers are not supported.
• Data Delays
  Free tier users may experience delays in data feeds, which can be critical during fast market movements.
• Customization Restrictions
  Some advanced customization options for charts and tools are restricted to higher subscription levels.
• Learning Curve for Pine Script
  Although powerful, Pine Script has a learning curve, which may be challenging for users who are not familiar with coding.

• Comprehensive Repository Analysis
  git-sizer analyzes many different dimensions of a Git repository including commit count, tree size, blob size, history depth, and reference counts, providing a holistic view of repository health and potential scaling issues.
• Easy to Use
  The tool is simple to run with minimal setup—just execute it within a git repository—and it produces clear, human-readable output that highlights potential problem areas without requiring complex configuration.
• Identifies Performance Bottlenecks
  It helps identify specific issues that could degrade Git performance, such as excessively large blobs, deep history, large trees, or too many references, which is valuable before migrating or scaling repositories.
• Open Source and Maintained by GitHub
  Being an official GitHub project, it benefits from credibility, community trust, and ongoing maintenance, and it is well documented with clear explanations of what each metric means.
• Useful for Pre-Migration Checks
  It's particularly helpful for teams migrating repositories to new platforms or consolidating repos, as it flags potential issues that could cause problems during migration or with hosting providers' limits.

Possible disadvantages

• No Automatic Remediation
  git-sizer only identifies and reports issues but does not offer any built-in tools or automated processes to fix problems like large blobs or excessive history depth—users must use separate tools like BFG Repo-Cleaner or git-filter-repo.
• Output Can Be Overwhelming for Beginners
  While detailed, the output includes many metrics and threshold levels that may be confusing for users unfamiliar with Git internals, requiring some learning curve to fully interpret results.
• Limited to Local Analysis
  The tool analyzes a local clone of the repository, so it requires users to have a full local copy of the repo (or at least enough history) to get accurate results, which can be time-consuming for very large repositories.
• No Real-Time Monitoring
  It functions as a one-time analysis tool rather than providing continuous or real-time monitoring of repository health, requiring manual reruns to track changes over time.
• Command-Line Only Interface
  The tool lacks a graphical user interface, which may be less accessible for users who prefer visual dashboards or are less comfortable with command-line tools.

No analysis of TradingView yet.

TRADINGVIEW REVIEW

More videos

No git-sizer videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• Best graph ever
  SaaSHub review

  · Mar 2026

  Best but to expensive

• TradingView Alternatives For Budget Conscious Traders
  medium.com · Aug 2024

  TradingView has changed their pricing and many users are not happy, especially those who use replay and multiple alerts. If you use the platform for charting, analysis and notifications and the shift from 5 alerts to...

• Top 8 Forex Tester Alternatives in 2024
  forextester.com · Jun 2024

  Overall, while TradingView is good for charting and casual testing, and it also has many other features for traders, besides backtesting. TradingView is good for traders who want to interact and trade in real-time but...

View more

We have no reviews of git-sizer yet. Be the first one to post

• Going from paper trading to real money. Best way to go about this?

  What is my best option here to move forward and play with $10 on tradingview.com. Source: about 3 years ago

• Daily Discussion Thread | July 11

  Maybe get on tradingview.com? Thats my favorite charting system outside of TOS. Its limited in the free version though. Source: about 3 years ago

• Big news for our BTC loyalists 📈

  According to data from TradingView.com, BTC has officially reached 50% market dominance for the first time in 2 years. Source: over 3 years ago

View more

• how to keep github repos small?

  Also there’s a cool project from GitHub you can use to help understand the size of git’s objects in your git repo https://github.com/github/git-sizer. This might help you determine what the best cloning strategy could be. Source: almost 5 years ago