Software Alternatives & Startups

Total Commander VS Apache Subversion

Compare Total Commander VS Apache Subversion and see what are their differences

Total Commander

A Shareware file manager for Windows® 95/98/ME/NT/2000/XP/Vista/7, and Windows® 3.1.

Rating
0 reviews
Apache Subversion

Mirror of Apache Subversion. Contribute to apache/subversion development by creating an account on GitHub.

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

File Manager popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
223 vs 75

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Total Commander
Apache Subversion
Website ghisler.com github.com
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Total Commander 5 features
Apache Subversion 5 features
  • Dual-pane Interface
    Total Commander features a dual-pane interface, which allows users to easily drag and drop files between directories, enhancing productivity and file management efficiency.
  • Customizability
    The application offers extensive customization options, including customizing the toolbar, keyboard shortcuts, and file display settings, providing users with a tailored experience.
  • Built-in FTP Client
    Total Commander includes an integrated FTP client, making it convenient for users to transfer files to and from remote servers without needing additional software.
  • Plugin Support
    Total Commander supports a wide range of plugins, adding extra functionalities like additional file system interfaces, file viewers, and archivers to extend the software's capabilities.
  • Powerful File Operations
    It offers advanced file operations such as multi-rename tool, file comparison, and synchronization, which are highly useful for power users managing large sets of files.

Possible disadvantages

  • Outdated Interface
    The interface of Total Commander can appear dated compared to modern file managers, which may be less appealing to new users accustomed to more contemporary designs.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its extensive features and customizability, new users might find Total Commander overwhelming and may require time to learn and utilize the software effectively.
  • Paid Software
    Total Commander is not free; although it offers a trial version, users need to purchase a license to access the full functionality, which may deter some users looking for free alternatives.
  • Limited OS Support
    While primarily designed for Windows, Total Commander has limited support for other operating systems. Though there are Android and Linux versions, they may not offer the same level of functionality as the Windows version.
  • No Cloud Integration
    Total Commander lacks built-in cloud storage integration, which is a feature increasingly expected by users looking to manage files across multiple cloud services directly from their file manager.
  • Centralized Version Control
    Apache Subversion (SVN) uses a centralized repository model, which makes it easy to manage and control all project files in one place. All history and versions are stored on the server, making backup and repository management straightforward.
  • Atomic Commits
    Subversion ensures that commits are atomic operations. This means that either all changes in a commit are applied, or none are, helping to maintain the integrity of the repository.
  • Comprehensive Authorization
    SVN offers fine-grained authentication and authorization models. It can integrate with various authentication systems and allows granular access control on a per-directory and per-user basis.
  • Binary File Handling
    SVN handles binary files more efficiently compared to some other version control systems, reducing the size of repositories and improving performance when large files are committed.
  • Mature and Stable
    SVN has been around since 2000 and is widely used in enterprise settings. It is stable, well-documented, and has a vast community for support.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Branching and Merging
    SVN’s branching and merging capabilities are more cumbersome compared to distributed version control systems (DVCS) like Git. Merging in SVN can be complex and time-consuming.
  • Single Point of Failure
    As a centralized version control system, the SVN repository server becomes a single point of failure. If the server goes down, no commits can be made until it is back up.
  • Performance Overhead
    Working with a remote central repository can introduce latency and performance overhead, especially with large projects and many users.
  • Less support for Offline Work
    SVN generally requires network access to the central repository for most operations. This makes it less flexible for developers needing to work offline, compared to DVCS where local copies are complete repositories.
  • Complex Repository Management
    Managing SVN repositories, particularly for large projects, can become complex and may require significant administrative effort to handle repositories, backups, and access controls.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Total Commander
Apache Subversion

No analysis of Total Commander yet.

Overall verdict

  • Apache Subversion is a solid choice for projects that require a centralized version control system with robust access controls and support for large file handling. While it may not offer the distributed features and branching flexibility of systems like Git, it remains a reliable and efficient tool for many development environments.

Why this product is good

  • Apache Subversion (SVN) is a centralized version control system that provides a simple model for versioning, which can be easier to understand for users who prefer a linear, sequential history of changes. It ensures a single source of truth and is well-suited for teams that require tight access control over the repository. SVN is also known for handling large files and binary files better than some distributed systems.

Recommended for

  • Organizations with strict version control policies
  • Teams that need centralized control over versioning
  • Projects with large binary files that need versioning
  • Users who are more comfortable with a sequential workflow

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Total Commander 3 videos + Add
Apache Subversion 1 video + Add

ENG Total Commander Tutorial - Manual: Installation, Multiple Rename ,FTP, Comparing

More videos

  • - Total Commander - Review, Tutorial und Tipps [Part 1]
  • - Total Commander - Review, Tutorial und Tipps [Part 2]

Setting Up Apache Subversion on Windows

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Total Commander
Apache Subversion
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
Git
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Total Commander and Apache Subversion. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Total Commander no reviews yet
Apache Subversion no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of Apache Subversion yet. Be the first one to post

Alternatives to Total Commander and Apache Subversion

When comparing Total Commander and Apache Subversion, you can also consider the following products.