Software Alternatives & Startups

Double Commander VS Apache Subversion

Compare Double Commander VS Apache Subversion and see what are their differences

Double Commander

Double Commander is a cross-platform open source file manager with two panels side by side.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Apache Subversion

Mirror of Apache Subversion. Contribute to apache/subversion development by creating an account on GitHub.

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Double Commander seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 24 times since March 2021.

social mentions
24 vs 0
File Manager popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
158 vs 75

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Double Commander
Apache Subversion
Website doublecmd.sourceforge.io github.com
Pricing
Open source
—
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Double Commander 7 features
Apache Subversion 5 features
  • Cross-Platform
    Double Commander is available for multiple operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS. This makes it a versatile choice for users operating across different platforms.
  • Free and Open Source
    Double Commander is free to download and its source code is open to the public. Users can modify and redistribute it under the GPL license, making it a cost-effective and customizable option.
  • Two-Panel Interface
    The application features a two-panel interface, which allows users to view and manage files in two distinct directories simultaneously. This enhances productivity and streamlines file operations.
  • Plugin Support
    Double Commander supports Total Commander WCX, WDX, and WLX plugins, providing additional functionalities such as extended file operations and viewing capabilities.
  • FTP/SFTP Support
    It includes built-in support for FTP and SFTP protocols, allowing users to easily manage files on remote servers.
  • Customizable User Interface
    Users can customize the layout, colors, and various other aspects of the interface to suit their individual preferences.
  • Advanced Search Function
    Double Commander offers an advanced search feature with various filters, allowing users to find files quickly and efficiently.

Possible disadvantages

  • Steeper Learning Curve
    The two-panel interface and multitude of features may be overwhelming for new users, leading to a steeper learning curve.
  • Occasional Bugs and Instability
    As an open-source project, Double Commander may occasionally suffer from bugs and stability issues, though these are often addressed by the community.
  • Less Polished UI
    The user interface, while customizable, may not be as polished or modern-looking as some commercial file managers.
  • Limited Integration
    Compared to some commercial options, Double Commander may offer limited integration with other applications and services out of the box.
  • Centralized Version Control
    Apache Subversion (SVN) uses a centralized repository model, which makes it easy to manage and control all project files in one place. All history and versions are stored on the server, making backup and repository management straightforward.
  • Atomic Commits
    Subversion ensures that commits are atomic operations. This means that either all changes in a commit are applied, or none are, helping to maintain the integrity of the repository.
  • Comprehensive Authorization
    SVN offers fine-grained authentication and authorization models. It can integrate with various authentication systems and allows granular access control on a per-directory and per-user basis.
  • Binary File Handling
    SVN handles binary files more efficiently compared to some other version control systems, reducing the size of repositories and improving performance when large files are committed.
  • Mature and Stable
    SVN has been around since 2000 and is widely used in enterprise settings. It is stable, well-documented, and has a vast community for support.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Branching and Merging
    SVN’s branching and merging capabilities are more cumbersome compared to distributed version control systems (DVCS) like Git. Merging in SVN can be complex and time-consuming.
  • Single Point of Failure
    As a centralized version control system, the SVN repository server becomes a single point of failure. If the server goes down, no commits can be made until it is back up.
  • Performance Overhead
    Working with a remote central repository can introduce latency and performance overhead, especially with large projects and many users.
  • Less support for Offline Work
    SVN generally requires network access to the central repository for most operations. This makes it less flexible for developers needing to work offline, compared to DVCS where local copies are complete repositories.
  • Complex Repository Management
    Managing SVN repositories, particularly for large projects, can become complex and may require significant administrative effort to handle repositories, backups, and access controls.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Double Commander
Apache Subversion

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Double Commander is a well-regarded file manager that can significantly improve file organization and management tasks, especially for users who prefer a Total Commander-like experience on Linux, Windows, or macOS.

Why this product is good

  • Double Commander is considered good due to its open-source nature, cross-platform support, and feature-rich environment. It offers a dual-pane interface, which enhances productivity by allowing users to easily manage files across different directories. Features such as tabbed browsing, an advanced search function, and the built-in file viewer/editor support diverse file formats, making it a versatile tool. Many users appreciate its customization options and support for WCX, WDX, and WLX plug-ins.

Recommended for

  • Users looking for a free, open-source alternative to Total Commander.
  • Those who frequently work with multiple files and directories and require efficient file management.
  • Users who prefer cross-platform tools that offer consistency across operating systems.
  • Individuals who appreciate customization and support for plug-ins to extend functionality.

Overall verdict

  • Apache Subversion is a solid choice for projects that require a centralized version control system with robust access controls and support for large file handling. While it may not offer the distributed features and branching flexibility of systems like Git, it remains a reliable and efficient tool for many development environments.

Why this product is good

  • Apache Subversion (SVN) is a centralized version control system that provides a simple model for versioning, which can be easier to understand for users who prefer a linear, sequential history of changes. It ensures a single source of truth and is well-suited for teams that require tight access control over the repository. SVN is also known for handling large files and binary files better than some distributed systems.

Recommended for

  • Organizations with strict version control policies
  • Teams that need centralized control over versioning
  • Projects with large binary files that need versioning
  • Users who are more comfortable with a sequential workflow

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Double Commander 2 videos + Add
Apache Subversion 1 video + Add

Check Out Double Commander File Manager In Ubuntu 16.04

More videos

  • - Context menu suggestion for Double Commander

Setting Up Apache Subversion on Windows

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Double Commander
Apache Subversion
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
Git
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Double Commander and Apache Subversion. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Double Commander no reviews yet
Apache Subversion no reviews yet

We have no reviews of Apache Subversion yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Double Commander 24 mentions
Apache Subversion 0 mentions

View more

Tracking Apache Subversion since May 2021.

Alternatives to Double Commander and Apache Subversion

When comparing Double Commander and Apache Subversion, you can also consider the following products.