Tiny C Compiler VS mruby

• Fast Compilation
  Tiny C Compiler (TCC) is known for its incredibly fast compilation speed, which makes it ideal for quick compilations and testing.
• Small Size
  TCC has a very small footprint compared to other compilers, making it easy to include in applications and use in environments with limited resources.
• C99 Support
  TCC provides support for the C99 standard, allowing the use of newer C language features.
• Dynamic Code Generation
  TCC can compile and execute code dynamically, which can be useful for scripting or embedded contexts.
• Simplified Licensing
  Under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), TCC can be more easily used in various projects, including proprietary ones, compared to compilers with more restrictive licenses.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Optimization
  TCC does not perform extensive optimization, which can result in less efficient executable code compared to compilers like GCC or Clang.
• Incomplete C Standard Library
  TCC's standard C library implementation is not as complete as those of more established compilers, which might lead to compatibility issues.
• Lack of Detailed Documentation
  Users may find the available documentation lacking in detail, which can hinder learning and debugging for complex projects.
• Limited Platform Support
  TCC is primarily designed for smaller-scale applications and lacks some platform-specific and cross-compilation capabilities.
• Fewer Community Resources
  Compared to major compilers like GCC or Clang, TCC has a smaller user community, which can mean fewer tutorials, forums, and third-party support tools.

• Lightweight
  mruby is designed to be small and lightweight, making it ideal for embedding in applications with limited resources.
• Embeddable
  mruby can be easily embedded into software applications, allowing developers to script functionalities within the application.
• Fast Execution
  It provides quick startup and execution times compared to many typical Ruby implementations, which enhances performance in resource-constrained environments.
• Simple License
  mruby is distributed under a simple and permissive license (MIT License), which is business-friendly and promotes wide adoption.
• Compatibility with Ruby Syntax
  mruby aims to be compatible with Ruby syntax, making it easier for developers familiar with Ruby to adopt and use it.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Standard Library
  mruby has a more limited standard library compared to full Ruby implementations, which can restrict development or require additional effort to implement missing features.
• Less Mature
  Being a smaller and newer implementation, it might lack the robustness and extensive library support seen in more mature Ruby versions like MRI.
• Less Community Support
  The community around mruby is smaller compared to the broader Ruby community, potentially leading to fewer resources or third-party libraries.
• Incompatibility with Some Ruby Gems
  Not all Ruby gems are compatible with mruby, as some rely on native extensions or parts of the Ruby standard library that are absent in mruby.
• Limited Debugging Tools
  The debugging and profiling tools available for mruby are not as extensive as those available for regular Ruby, which can make troubleshooting more challenging.

• What every compiler writer should know about programmers (Anton Ertl, 2015) [pdf]

  Some of those already exist, e.g. https://bellard.org/tcc/ However, they're not in widespread use. I would be curious to learn if there's any data/non-anecdotal information as to why. Is it momentum/inertia of GCC/LLVM/MSVC? Are... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

• Git: Introduce Rust and announce that it will become mandatorty

  In theory you should be able to use TCC to build git currently [1] [2]. If you have a lightweight system or you're building something experimental, it's a lot easier to get TCC up and running over GCC. I note that it supports arm, arm64,... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• Weird Lexical Syntax

  > I'm not sure who wants to be able to syntax highlight C at 35 MB per second, but I am now able to do so Fast, but tcc *compiles* C to binary code at 29 MB/s on a really old computer: https://bellard.org/tcc/#speed. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

View more

• Embed mruby as a Single Binary That Runs Everywhere

  I already have lua embeded into Rapidforge binary because lets admit it after certain size its very difficult to code with bash. I wanted to support mruby as well becuase I really love ruby and I think you can express complex ideas... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

• Playing with DragonRuby Game Toolkit (DRGTK)

  This Ruby implementation is based on mruby and LLVM and it’s commercial software but cheap. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

• Natalie – a work-in-progress Ruby compiler, written in Ruby and C++

  > I guess the standard Ruby compiler doesn't allow you to spit out binaries Ruby is an interpreted language (+ JIT compiler). I wonder what makes this different from mruby[1] which seems to be very well supported for many years. [1]... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

View more