I want to compile C program for various operating systems from one machine, that's why on macOS M1 I use zig drop-in replacement compiler (can be used on Linux, Windows too) for cross-platform compilation. There are also clang, gcc (usually pre-installed on macOS and Linux). For Windows there are Visual Studio installer or mingw (which installs gcc). - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago

If you are turning your source code into languages such as C or C++, it is required to have great understanding and knowledge of C/C++. Since these languages also have compilers be it GNU Compiler Collection or Clang, we have to do a lot of digging and researching around their features and functionalities. There is a lot of benefit in that once the target codebase grows and developers start reusing the target... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago

Clang is an LLVM based C compiler that "allows better diagnostics, better integration with IDEs, a license that is compatible with commercial products, and a nimble compiler that is easy to develop and maintain," compared to other options. Source: over 2 years ago

VS Code is not an IDE. It's simply an editor without any built-in compiler tools. So you MUST use "other compiler" (and bintools) anyway. As I said, Apple's official C/C++ compiler is LLVM-Clang, which offers even better optimization in some tasks. Source: over 2 years ago

One illustration of this came in 2015 when Stallman decided he Would rather prevent the Gnu Compiler Collection from supporting modern IDE features like symbol completion, than allow GCC front ends to be paired with free-but-not-copyleft backends like LLVM and Clang: "Since LLVM and Clang are not copylefted, they invite nonfree extensions. They are a gaping hole in the defensive wall around our city." Allowing... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

This Ruby implementation is based on mruby and LLVM and it’s commercial software but cheap. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago

> I guess the standard Ruby compiler doesn't allow you to spit out binaries Ruby is an interpreted language (+ JIT compiler). I wonder what makes this different from mruby[1] which seems to be very well supported for many years. [1] https://mruby.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

Mruby[1] fits that category too. It can be used with H2O[2] server as well. There was a discussion here a couple of months ago regarding some use cases[3]. - [1] https://mruby.org. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

Matz's Ruby programming language has been simplified into MRuby. It is a scripting language that is almost universally usable. As far as integration into a virtual environment is concerned, It makes me think a lot of the Lua scripting language. Source: over 2 years ago

I recently learned that Ruby has a lite version. By embedding it in a host, it is hackable. It resembles Lua. It's substantially faster and is known as MRuby. Here, I'll discuss what I learned about using it in a test project. So I'll also be presenting some C) language codes here. Source: over 2 years ago