Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Testmy.net VS Continue.dev

Compare Testmy.net VS Continue.dev and see what are their differences

Testmy.net logo Testmy.net

Accurately test your Internet connection speed with this powerful broadband speed test. Improve your bandwidth speed with the truth.

Continue.dev logo Continue.dev

Continue is the leading open-source AI code assistant. You can connect any models and any context to build custom autocomplete and chat experiences inside VS Code and JetBrains.
  • Testmy.net Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-13
Not present

Testmy.net features and specs

  • Accurate Results
    Testmy.net provides very accurate speed test results as it doesn't use common data compression techniques that can give misleadingly high speeds.
  • No Flash or Java Required
    Unlike some other speed test tools, Testmy.net runs directly on HTML5, meaning there's no need for Flash or Java plugins, which can be deprecated or insecure.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    It works seamlessly on various devices and operating systems, including desktop computers, tablets, and smartphones.
  • Advanced Diagnostics
    The site offers detailed diagnostic information, helping users get a clear picture of download and upload speeds, as well as network health.
  • Historical Data
    Users can track their connection performance over time with detailed historical data and reports.
  • Community Insights
    The platform allows users to compare their results with others, providing insights into how their connection stacks up against averages or specific ISPs.

Possible disadvantages of Testmy.net

  • No Mobile App
    Unlike some competitors, Testmy.net does not offer a dedicated mobile app, which limits convenient access for some users.
  • Interface Age
    The websiteโ€™s interface can feel somewhat dated compared to more modern speed test tools, possibly affecting user experience.
  • Limited Server Locations
    There are fewer server locations compared to some other speed test services like Ookla, potentially impacting the accuracy of some international users' tests.
  • Advertisements
    The site contains advertisements which can be distracting and may affect the overall user experience.
  • No Real-Time Monitoring
    It lacks features for real-time speed monitoring, which some advanced users may find essential.
  • Limited Support
    Customer support options are limited, with no dedicated support team readily available for troubleshooting issues.

Continue.dev features and specs

  • Seamless Integration
    Continue.dev offers seamless integration with popular Integrated Development Environments (IDEs), allowing users to enhance their existing workflows without substantial changes.
  • Code Generation
    It provides robust code generation features that can increase productivity by automating repetitive coding tasks, saving developers time and effort.
  • Ease of Use
    The platform's user-friendly interface and clear documentation make it easy for developers to get started quickly, even with limited prior experience.
  • Community Support
    Continue.dev has an active community and support system, which can help users troubleshoot issues and share best practices.
  • Real-time Collaboration
    The platform supports real-time collaboration features that can help teams work together more efficiently, facilitating better communication and project management.

Possible disadvantages of Continue.dev

  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, there is still a learning curve for new users, particularly for those unfamiliar with AI-assisted development tools.
  • Dependency on IDE
    The performance and utility of Continue.dev heavily depend on its integration with specific IDEs, which might not suit developers using other environments.
  • Subscription Costs
    Access to the full feature set may require a subscription, which might be a consideration for small teams or individual developers with limited budgets.
  • Privacy Concerns
    As with many AI-driven tools, there could be privacy concerns related to code and data sharing, which organizations need to manage carefully.
  • Limited Offline Functionality
    The tool may offer limited functionality when offline, which could be a drawback for developers working in environments with unstable internet access.

Analysis of Testmy.net

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Testmy.net is considered a reliable tool for users seeking accurate and detailed information about their internet speed, especially for those who want to understand fluctuations in performance over time.

Why this product is good

  • Testmy.net is widely appreciated for its straightforward and easy-to-use interface that allows users to assess their internet speed without the need for plugins or automatic adjustments that might skew results. Unlike some other tools, it focuses on real-world scenarios and provides in-depth analysis to help diagnose connection issues.

Recommended for

    This tool is particularly recommended for individuals who require consistent and accurate monitoring of their internet speed, such as gamers, remote workers, and tech enthusiasts who need to troubleshoot connectivity issues effectively.

Testmy.net videos

Speed Test at testmy.net

Continue.dev videos

CONTINUE.DEV HONEST REVIEW: WORTH IT AI CODE ASSISTANT?

More videos:

  • Review - Continue.dev vs. Cline: The Best Coding Assistant for VSCode?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Testmy.net and Continue.dev)
Developer Tools
94 94%
6% 6
AI
0 0%
100% 100
Speed Test
100 100%
0% 0
Internet
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Testmy.net and Continue.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Testmy.net seems to be a lot more popular than Continue.dev. While we know about 175 links to Testmy.net, we've tracked only 3 mentions of Continue.dev. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Testmy.net mentions (175)

  • Slow internet issues with lots of uncorrectables
    Hello! Ever since moving into a new house, I've haven't been getting the speeds I've expecting. Specifically, videos and websites will fail to load or load extremely slowly most of the time. The odd thing is, when running a speed test (tested using both testmy.net and speedtest.net on Firefox with my laptop wired via ethernet), I'll get 5 mbs down on the first test, 100 mbs on the second test, then back down to 15... Source: over 2 years ago
  • Show HN: Internet Speed Test
    Another speed test site is https://testmy.net The site claims superior accuracy (which I can't confirm but probably someone here can evaluate one way or the other). The site offers a number of test options and other amenities. I'll have to try these other sites to see how they compare. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Nothing but issues, so here's my review in "old man yells at cloud" style
    T-Mobile - 5G WI-FI decently priced... If it only worked! Below I'll post my results from a few hours of a test I did today using Testmy.net. This is an every day occurrence. You could be watching a YouTube video at a nice 1080p60, but then it'll switch to buffering for about 5-15 minutes on average. Or you can watch it on 144p or 240p "with some buffering". The longest downtime was for about 45 minutes to date. Source: about 3 years ago
  • CelcomDigi Fibre Broadbrand
    Go to testmy.net and test it, what are the scores there? Source: about 3 years ago
  • Why does the SL speedtest differ soooo much from Ookla test results? Which should I trust?
    I prefer using TestMy Which one is better? Your guess is as good as mine.... Source: about 3 years ago
View more

Continue.dev mentions (3)

  • Feeding BrassCoders Output to Any AI Coding Assistant
    Check Continue's documentation for the current @file syntax in your version, as context-provider behavior has evolved across releases. - Source: dev.to / 1 day ago
  • Using GitHub MCP With Continue to Review PRs and Issues 5 Faster
    # This is an example configuration file # To learn more, see the full config.yaml reference: https://docs.continue.dev/reference Name: Example Config Version: 1.0.0 Schema: v1 # Define which models can be used # https://docs.continue.dev/customization/models Models: - name: my gpt-5 provider: openai model: gpt-5 apiKey: YOUR_OPENAI_API_KEY_HERE - uses: ollama/qwen2.5-coder-7b - uses:... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • When AI Assistants Meet Your VS Code Setup
    The Setup Reality: Installing Continue was straightforward since it functions as VS Code extension. Thereโ€™s a bit of a jump to configure. I was using Agent mode, and some of the settings have to be changed on the web UI. Right now, Iโ€™m using two different assistants: one for my Jekyll project and the other for my Astro projects. You can customize your assistant with what they call blocks by setting things like... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Testmy.net and Continue.dev, you can also consider the following products

Fast.com - Quickly test your internet speed with this fast-loading speed test powered by Netflix.

Cursor - The AI-first Code Editor. Build software faster in an editor designed for pair-programming with AI.

Speedtest.net - Test your Internet connection bandwidth to locations around the world with this interactive broadband speed test from Ookla

Windsurf Editor - Tomorrow's editor, today. Windsurf Editor is the first AI agent-powered IDE that keeps developers in the flow. Available today on Mac, Windows, and Linux.

SpeedOf.Me - SpeedOf.Me is an HTML5 Internet speed test. No Flash or Java needed!

Claude Code - Transform hours of debugging into seconds with a single command. Experience coding at thought-speed with Claude's AI that understands your entire codebaseโ€”no more context switching, just breakthrough results.