Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
SH

SourceHut VS Commitlog

Compare SourceHut VS Commitlog and see what are their differences

IsDown.app
Monitor all your cloud services with our status page aggregator. IT teams choose IsDown to monitor all their vendors and get alerts whenever an outage occurs. Integration with Datadog, PagerDuty, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and a lot more. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

SourceHut logo SourceHut

Git and Mercurial hosting, mailing lists, bug tracking, continuous integration, and more

Commitlog logo Commitlog

Generate changelogs from commits
  • SourceHut Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-17
  • Commitlog Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-02

SourceHut features and specs

  • Minimalistic Design
    SourceHut prides itself on simplicity and a minimalist interface, which makes it easy to navigate and reduces distractions.
  • Highly Configurable CI
    SourceHut offers a highly configurable continuous integration (CI) system that allows for a great deal of customization in build pipelines.
  • Focus on Free Software
    SourceHut places a strong emphasis on free and open-source software, aligning with the values of many developers in the community.
  • Fast Performance
    The lightweight nature of SourceHut's web interface enhances load times and overall performance.
  • Email-based Workflow
    The platform offers a unique email-based workflow for code review and patches, which can be more efficient for some developers.
  • Privacy-focused
    SourceHut emphasizes user privacy, avoiding tracking and invasive data collection.

Possible disadvantages of SourceHut

  • Learning Curve
    The unique email-based workflow and minimalist design might have a steeper learning curve for new users.
  • Lack of Popular Integrations
    Unlike some other platforms, SourceHut does not support as many third-party integrations out of the box.
  • Paid Service
    SourceHut is primarily a paid service, which might be a barrier for some users, especially those looking for free options.
  • Limited Community Support
    As a relatively new and niche platform, SourceHut has a smaller user community, which can limit the availability of community support and resources.
  • Sparse Documentation
    The documentation available might be considered sparse compared to more established platforms, making it harder for new users to get started.
  • Fewer Built-in Features
    SourceHut has fewer built-in features compared to giants like GitHub or GitLab, which offer extensive integrated tools and services.

Commitlog features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis of SourceHut

Overall verdict

  • SourceHut is considered a good option, especially for developers who prioritize simplicity, speed, and the ethical aspects of software development.

Why this product is good

  • SourceHut is a lightweight and minimalist platform for software development. It supports various features such as mailing lists, bug tracking, and continuous integration while placing a strong emphasis on ethical design, privacy, and transparency. SourceHut appeals to those who appreciate open-source values and prefer a platform that doesn't overburden them with unnecessary features.

Recommended for

  • Developers who prefer minimalistic and efficient tooling
  • Open-source enthusiasts who value transparency and privacy
  • Teams looking for straightforward continuous integration and bug tracking solutions
  • Projects that benefit from a mailing list-based workflow

SourceHut videos

+ Add

System Crafters Live! - What is GNU? • Is Sourcehut the future? • Q&A

More videos:

  • Review - Building Natalie on OpenBSD with Sourcehut

Commitlog videos

No Commitlog videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to SourceHut and Commitlog)

SourceHut

Commitlog

Git
100 100%
Git
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100
Code Collaboration
100 100%
Code Collaboration
0% 0
Tech
0 0%
Tech
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using SourceHut and Commitlog. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, SourceHut seems to be a lot more popular than Commitlog. While we know about 58 links to SourceHut, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Commitlog. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

SourceHut mentions (58)

  • Forgejo: A self-hosted lightweight software forge
    b) The barrier to create accounts on yet another platform to contribute. In that regards I find the original way of just using email's to send patches just such a brilliant idea, because at least it eliminates my second point completely. That's why I think sourcehut [0] is such a nice idea at least in theory. Though now you have to teach people not only how to use "git" but also hot to use "git" via email :D... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Ask HN: Anyonne tried alternative company models (like a co-op) for SaaS?
    Https://sourcehut.org/ is a sort of coop open source project and a SaaS with an interesting model. There is also https://opencollective.com/ which provides a platform for collective ownership of an online business. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Why GitHub Won
    If you just want an online repository, go with Sourcehut (https://sourcehut.org/). - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Ask HN: What's Happenning with SourceHut?
    For anyone coming across this, a new page has been set up at https://sourcehut.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Using Git Offline
    Do you know SourceHut? https://sourcehut.org/ I would be really curious to have your opinion about it as compared to how it was 14 years ago. I feel like SourceHut does a really good job helping on the tooling side (it's super easy to setup a mailing list). Also I find Aerc very cool for that. The author describes it here: https://drewdevault.com/2022/07/25/Code-review-with-aerc.html. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

Commitlog mentions (2)

  • My Git Workflow
    Now those are basically all the commands I use, git log would be another but then I use commitlog now so that's out of the picture for most part right now. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
  • How building something else is distracting me.
    I was talking about building useful stuff for people to use, that reminds me commitlog reached about 48 stars at the time of writing this, so that's really nice but let's see if I can build a lot more tools that work well in everyone's workflow. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing SourceHut and Commitlog, you can also consider the following products

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

Commits.io - Create a poster for your office using your code

Gitea - A painless self-hosted Git service

Codenail - Create art with your code and logo and order a poster of it

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

Commit Print - Posters of your git history

Loading...