Minimalistic Design
SourceHut prides itself on simplicity and a minimalist interface, which makes it easy to navigate and reduces distractions.
Highly Configurable CI
SourceHut offers a highly configurable continuous integration (CI) system that allows for a great deal of customization in build pipelines.
Focus on Free Software
SourceHut places a strong emphasis on free and open-source software, aligning with the values of many developers in the community.
Fast Performance
The lightweight nature of SourceHut's web interface enhances load times and overall performance.
Email-based Workflow
The platform offers a unique email-based workflow for code review and patches, which can be more efficient for some developers.
Privacy-focused
SourceHut emphasizes user privacy, avoiding tracking and invasive data collection.
SourceHut is considered a good option, especially for developers who prioritize simplicity, speed, and the ethical aspects of software development.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if SourceHut is good.
Check the traffic stats of SourceHut on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of SourceHut on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of SourceHut's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of SourceHut on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about SourceHut on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
The offering in question is "A better GitHub" so you are correct. That is an actual quote from the FAQ [0] by the way. In comparison CodeBerg [1] and SourceHut [2] both offer Git hosting but don't merely describe themselves as "GitHub but X". [0] https://gitdot.io/faq [2] https://sourcehut.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 days ago
Would be interested in a comparison with https://sourcehut.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 days ago
Right, I always forget that the sr.ht link is to the application itself. For anybody else who needs it, the page with info about the service is here: https://sourcehut.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
I'm probably going to use source hut in the future. It allows contributions via email without an account requirement. https://sourcehut.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
Sourcehut comes to my mind: https://sourcehut.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Here's the pricing page, for anyone curious: https://sourcehut.org/pricing/ > All users who host projects on SourceHut are expected to pay according to their means. Choose the subscription plan most appropriate to your means โ there is no difference between the subscriptions besides price. Interesting approach and asking for some money upfront to cover the actual hosting costs and other stuff feels pretty good -... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
> I think it would've been far easier to build a decent GUI around that flow, with some email integration + a patch preview tool, rather than adding activitypub, but oh well. Check out Sourcehut (https://sourcehut.org/). It uses a mailing list-based workflow so contributing code or bug reports is relatively effortless and doesn't require a Sourcehut account. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
NextCloud does feel slow. What I want is not only a cloud service that does lots of common tasks, but it also should do it lightly and simply. I'm extremely tempted to write a lightweight alternative. I'm thinking sourcehut [1] vs GitHub. [1] https://sourcehut.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
Just migrate to Forgejo/Codeberg[1][2] or SourceHut[3]. Both are like a light speed compared to GitHub and GitLab. [1] https://forgejo.org [2] https://codeberg.org [3] https://sourcehut.org. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
b) The barrier to create accounts on yet another platform to contribute. In that regards I find the original way of just using email's to send patches just such a brilliant idea, because at least it eliminates my second point completely. That's why I think sourcehut [0] is such a nice idea at least in theory. Though now you have to teach people not only how to use "git" but also hot to use "git" via email :D... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Https://sourcehut.org/ is a sort of coop open source project and a SaaS with an interesting model. There is also https://opencollective.com/ which provides a platform for collective ownership of an online business. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
If you just want an online repository, go with Sourcehut (https://sourcehut.org/). - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
For anyone coming across this, a new page has been set up at https://sourcehut.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Do you know SourceHut? https://sourcehut.org/ I would be really curious to have your opinion about it as compared to how it was 14 years ago. I feel like SourceHut does a really good job helping on the tooling side (it's super easy to setup a mailing list). Also I find Aerc very cool for that. The author describes it here: https://drewdevault.com/2022/07/25/Code-review-with-aerc.html. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
A few comments in-line, but I don't want to "sell" anything to you, so just FWIW. > The amount of "gotchas" in this process and the tooling required just to use git + email seems insane to me. The base system is really, really simple, but there are some common rules/guidelines that just help when working together, and those are required for forge based workflows too (or do you like a single commit touching a dozen... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
> We're planning on expanding to support other forges, Just want to put in a request for SourceHut support in case it's not already on your list. Sometimes it gets overlooked in favor of the big corporate forges. https://sourcehut.org/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
Https://sourcehut.org/ fits this pretty well. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
Not shilling here, but big upvote for Sourcehut - https://sourcehut.org/ When you pay money to Drew DeVault and his crew, their work is all open source. And, that includes work outside of Sourcehut. They are also hired guns for existing open source projects. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
There's a number of places out there, some of which also support alternatives to Git itself. By no means a complete list and in no particular order: GitLab - https://about.gitlab.com/ Sourcehut - https://sourcehut.org/ Codeberg - https://codeberg.org/ Launchpad - https://launchpad.net/ Debian Salsa - https://salsa.debian.org/public Pagure - https://pagure.io/pagure For self hsoted options, there's these below... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
Drew Devault is an example of someone that has done this. He has developed many useful pieces of software. He eventually developed sourcehut, which is a code hosting (and many other things now) platform that is developed as free software. And it seems to make enough money to support him and a few others. Source: about 3 years ago
SourceHut[1] has CI out of the box[2]. [1] https://sourcehut.org [2] https://man.sr.ht/tutorials/getting-started-with-builds.md. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
Do you know an article comparing SourceHut to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is SourceHut good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss SourceHut here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.