Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Commits.io VS SourceHut

Compare Commits.io VS SourceHut and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Commits.io logo Commits.io

Create a poster for your office using your code

SourceHut logo SourceHut

Git and Mercurial hosting, mailing lists, bug tracking, continuous integration, and more
  • Commits.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-02-27
  • SourceHut Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-17

Commits.io features and specs

  • Customization
    Commits.io allows users to create personalized posters of their GitHub contributions, enabling customization of specific milestones or events.
  • Aesthetic Appeal
    The service provides an aesthetically pleasing way to showcase one's GitHub activity, transforming digital contributions into tangible artwork.
  • Motivation
    Having a physical representation of one's work can serve as a motivational tool and provide a sense of accomplishment.
  • Gifting
    The option to generate customized posters makes it an ideal gift for developers who appreciate personalized and meaningful presents.

Possible disadvantages of Commits.io

  • Cost
    There is a cost associated with printing and shipping the posters, which might be a deterrent for some users.
  • Limited Audience
    The service primarily appeals to developers actively using GitHub, limiting its broader applicability and audience.
  • Privacy Concerns
    Users need to consider the privacy of their GitHub data, as sharing contribution information might not be desirable for everyone.
  • Dependence on GitHub
    The service relies heavily on GitHub data, which means that changes to GitHub's API or data access permissions could impact functionality.

SourceHut features and specs

  • Minimalistic Design
    SourceHut prides itself on simplicity and a minimalist interface, which makes it easy to navigate and reduces distractions.
  • Highly Configurable CI
    SourceHut offers a highly configurable continuous integration (CI) system that allows for a great deal of customization in build pipelines.
  • Focus on Free Software
    SourceHut places a strong emphasis on free and open-source software, aligning with the values of many developers in the community.
  • Fast Performance
    The lightweight nature of SourceHut's web interface enhances load times and overall performance.
  • Email-based Workflow
    The platform offers a unique email-based workflow for code review and patches, which can be more efficient for some developers.
  • Privacy-focused
    SourceHut emphasizes user privacy, avoiding tracking and invasive data collection.

Possible disadvantages of SourceHut

  • Learning Curve
    The unique email-based workflow and minimalist design might have a steeper learning curve for new users.
  • Lack of Popular Integrations
    Unlike some other platforms, SourceHut does not support as many third-party integrations out of the box.
  • Paid Service
    SourceHut is primarily a paid service, which might be a barrier for some users, especially those looking for free options.
  • Limited Community Support
    As a relatively new and niche platform, SourceHut has a smaller user community, which can limit the availability of community support and resources.
  • Sparse Documentation
    The documentation available might be considered sparse compared to more established platforms, making it harder for new users to get started.
  • Fewer Built-in Features
    SourceHut has fewer built-in features compared to giants like GitHub or GitLab, which offer extensive integrated tools and services.

Analysis of SourceHut

Overall verdict

  • SourceHut is considered a good option, especially for developers who prioritize simplicity, speed, and the ethical aspects of software development.

Why this product is good

  • SourceHut is a lightweight and minimalist platform for software development. It supports various features such as mailing lists, bug tracking, and continuous integration while placing a strong emphasis on ethical design, privacy, and transparency. SourceHut appeals to those who appreciate open-source values and prefer a platform that doesn't overburden them with unnecessary features.

Recommended for

  • Developers who prefer minimalistic and efficient tooling
  • Open-source enthusiasts who value transparency and privacy
  • Teams looking for straightforward continuous integration and bug tracking solutions
  • Projects that benefit from a mailing list-based workflow

Commits.io videos

No Commits.io videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

SourceHut videos

System Crafters Live! - What is GNU? • Is Sourcehut the future? • Q&A

More videos:

  • Review - Building Natalie on OpenBSD with Sourcehut

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Commits.io and SourceHut)
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Git
0 0%
100% 100
Web App
100 100%
0% 0
Code Collaboration
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Commits.io and SourceHut. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, SourceHut seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 58 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Commits.io mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Commits.io yet. Tracking of Commits.io recommendations started around Mar 2021.

SourceHut mentions (58)

  • Forgejo: A self-hosted lightweight software forge
    b) The barrier to create accounts on yet another platform to contribute. In that regards I find the original way of just using email's to send patches just such a brilliant idea, because at least it eliminates my second point completely. That's why I think sourcehut [0] is such a nice idea at least in theory. Though now you have to teach people not only how to use "git" but also hot to use "git" via email :D... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Ask HN: Anyonne tried alternative company models (like a co-op) for SaaS?
    Https://sourcehut.org/ is a sort of coop open source project and a SaaS with an interesting model. There is also https://opencollective.com/ which provides a platform for collective ownership of an online business. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Why GitHub Won
    If you just want an online repository, go with Sourcehut (https://sourcehut.org/). - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Ask HN: What's Happenning with SourceHut?
    For anyone coming across this, a new page has been set up at https://sourcehut.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Using Git Offline
    Do you know SourceHut? https://sourcehut.org/ I would be really curious to have your opinion about it as compared to how it was 14 years ago. I feel like SourceHut does a really good job helping on the tooling side (it's super easy to setup a mailing list). Also I find Aerc very cool for that. The author describes it here: https://drewdevault.com/2022/07/25/Code-review-with-aerc.html. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Commits.io and SourceHut, you can also consider the following products

Text Mess - Turn your text messages into art

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

RePix - RePix helps you in batch resizing any image into a preset resolution and save it easily and quickly.

Gitea - A painless self-hosted Git service

Commit Print - Posters of your git history

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.