
Socket.io
Pusher
Ably
PubNub
SignalR
Faye
NATS
An open, scalable realtime engine for Node.js

ShipFa.st
supastarter
NextBase
Nexty.dev
MkSaaS
GetCreator.dev
SaaSykit
MakerKit is a SaaS Starter Kit for Next.js/Tanstack Start and with Supabase/Drizzle/Prisma variants. Build unlimited SaaS products in record time with the best SaaS Boilerplate.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, SocketCluster should be more popular than Makerkit.dev. It has been mentioned 16 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | socketcluster.io | makerkit.dev |
| Pricing | ||
| Company | — | Startup from Singapore · 1 - 9 employees · 2022 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of SocketCluster yet.
Makerkit is a production-ready SaaS starter kit built with Next.js App Router and Supabase that helps developers launch faster. It provides a robust foundation with built-in authentication, team management, billing integration, and Super Admin - all powered by a modular architecture that makes...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of SocketCluster yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
013 Client side Logins Authentication with Socketcluster with the client
No Makerkit.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing SocketCluster and Makerkit.dev.
Makerkit.dev's answer:
Indie Hackers and Companies who want to launch quickly, without compromising on quality.
Makerkit.dev's answer:
Makerkit uses Next.js 15 (App Router), Supabase, React.js, Typescript and Stripe.
Makerkit.dev's answer:
Makerkit stands out by offering a truly modular architecture built with Turborepo, where core features like auth, billing, and notifications live in their own packages for better maintainability.
While most starters lock you into specific patterns or providers, Makerkit gives you flexibility with a multi-account system supporting both B2B and B2C scenarios, provider-agnostic billing, and edge-ready deployment options.
Beyond the basics, it includes production-ready features like multi-factor auth, real-time notifications, and team permissions - all built with Supabase, TypeScript, React Query, and modern tooling to make development a genuine pleasure.
Makerkit.dev's answer:
While other starters give you basic auth and a dashboard, Makerkit provides a genuinely modular foundation with the real features SaaS products need - like multi-factor auth, team permissions, real-time notifications, and provider-agnostic billing, all organized in clean, maintainable packages using Turborepo.
You get a first-class developer experience with TypeScript, React Query, and modern tooling, plus the flexibility to support both B2B and B2C scenarios, different payment providers, and edge deployment options.
Best of all, Makerkit is actively maintained with regular updates and responsive support, so you're building on a foundation that grows with your needs rather than painting yourself into a corner.
Share your experience with using SocketCluster and Makerkit.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


This is basically the principle behind https://socketcluster.io/ scalability; the sharding of channels across available brokers is pseudo-random. It uses a hash function for determinism but the distribution looks essentially random. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
I started building something pretty obscure about 14 years ago; https://socketcluster.io/ an open source, WebSocket-based RPC + pub/sub library with a focus on in-order async stream-processing with backpressure monitoring. It didn't... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
I've been advocating for this approach for years. You can't avoid race conditions without using some kind of queueing mechanism and you need backpressure to measure queue capacity. I built this into every aspect of... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Price: $299 (Pro, individual) / $599 (Teams, 5 collaborators) - one-time, lifetime access URL: makerkit.dev. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
I saw these ones mentioned in an HN comment: - https://achromatic.dev - https://makerkit.dev - https://www.spirokit.com/ - https://saasykit.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
When comparing SocketCluster and Makerkit.dev, you can also consider the following products.

Realtime application framework (Node.JS server)
Compare Socket.io to SocketCluster or Makerkit.dev:

The NextJS boilerplate with all the stuff you need to get your product in front of customers. From idea to production in 5 minutes.
Compare ShipFa.st to SocketCluster or Makerkit.dev:

Pusher is a hosted API for quickly, easily and securely adding scalable realtime functionality via WebSockets to web and mobile apps.
Compare Pusher to SocketCluster or Makerkit.dev:

The boilerplate for your next web app built on top of Supabase and Next.js.
Compare supastarter to SocketCluster or Makerkit.dev:

The realtime platform that just works. We power more WebSocket connections than any other pub/sub platform, serving over 2 billion devices monthly.
Compare Ably to SocketCluster or Makerkit.dev:

Built your SAAS quickly and skip the boring parts
Compare NextBase to SocketCluster or Makerkit.dev: