Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Pusher VS SocketCluster

Compare Pusher VS SocketCluster and see what are their differences

Pusher logo Pusher

Pusher is a hosted API for quickly, easily and securely adding scalable realtime functionality via WebSockets to web and mobile apps.

SocketCluster logo SocketCluster

An open, scalable realtime engine for Node.js
  • Pusher Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-05
  • SocketCluster Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-07

Pusher features and specs

  • Real-Time Capabilities
    Pusher offers real-time data transfer, enabling instant updates and live feeds without the need for page refreshes. Its WebSockets-based architecture ensures low latency communication.
  • Ease of Use
    The API is straightforward to integrate, with comprehensive documentation and SDKs for various programming languages and platforms, making implementation quick and painless.
  • Scalability
    Pusher can handle a large number of concurrent connections, making it suitable for applications that need to scale seamlessly as user demand grows.
  • Security
    Pusher provides built-in authentication and authorization options, ensuring that data is secure and accessible only to authorized users.
  • Managed Service
    As a managed service, it eliminates the need for maintaining the infrastructure for real-time functionality, freeing up resources and reducing operational complexity.

Possible disadvantages of Pusher

  • Cost
    Pusher can become expensive, especially for applications with high traffic or requiring a large number of concurrent connections, making it less suitable for startups or small-scale projects on a tight budget.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Relying heavily on Pusher's services can lead to vendor lock-in, making it challenging to migrate to another service or in-house solution in the future.
  • Limited Offline Functionality
    Pusher is designed for real-time online communication, and it does not inherently support offline capabilities, which can be a limitation for applications that need to function without a constant internet connection.
  • Complexity for Advanced Use Cases
    While it's easy to set up for basic use cases, implementing more complex scenarios may require additional configuration and a deeper understanding of the architecture.
  • Latency
    Even though Pusher boasts low-latency communication, network conditions and geographical distances can still introduce lag, which might not be acceptable for ultra-low-latency requirements like high-frequency trading.

SocketCluster features and specs

  • Scalability
    SocketCluster is designed to be highly scalable, allowing the creation of distributed systems that can handle massive real-time workloads by leveraging multi-core servers and multiple machines.
  • Real-time Performance
    SocketCluster provides low-latency, real-time two-way communication between clients and servers, which is ideal for applications requiring instant data exchange.
  • Flexibility
    It supports a wide range of protocols and languages, which allows developers to create versatile and powerful WebSocket-based applications. It also allows for custom authentication and middleware.
  • Resilience
    Offers automatic reconnections and failover mechanisms, which enhance system reliability and uptime by managing connection interruptions gracefully.
  • Pub/Sub Model
    The built-in publish/subscribe model simplifies message broadcasting to multiple clients and is useful for applications like chat or collaborative tools.
  • Community and Support
    SocketCluster has an active community and good documentation, which helps developers find resources, tutorials, and support through discourse and GitHub.

Possible disadvantages of SocketCluster

  • Complexity
    Setting up and managing a SocketCluster deployment can be complex, especially when dealing with distributed clusters and scaling out, which may require significant effort and expertise.
  • Resource Intensive
    SocketCluster applications can be resource-intensive depending on the scale, requiring careful planning of infrastructure to ensure performance and cost-effectiveness.
  • Maintenance Overhead
    Managing a SocketCluster environment could introduce additional maintenance tasks, such as monitoring and upgrading clusters and handling failover scenarios.
  • Client Support
    Not all environments may support WebSockets natively, which may require polyfills or fallbacks for compatibility, potentially increasing complexity and development time.

Pusher videos

Mark Kermode reviews Pusher

More videos:

  • Review - Pusher (1996) - Movie Review
  • Review - Film Recommendations: The Pusher Trilogy

SocketCluster videos

013 Client side Logins Authentication with Socketcluster with the client

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Pusher and SocketCluster)
Mobile Push Messaging
87 87%
13% 13
Developer Tools
79 79%
21% 21
Web Push Notifications
100 100%
0% 0
App Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Pusher and SocketCluster. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Pusher and SocketCluster

Pusher Reviews

SignalR Alternatives
Pusher as a signal Alternative comes into the picture when it is simple and has free plans for the fallback of SSE to make the frame and log polling also available to the developers for troubleshooting as well.
Source: www.educba.com

SocketCluster Reviews

We have no reviews of SocketCluster yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Pusher should be more popular than SocketCluster. It has been mentiond 55 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Pusher mentions (55)

  • 5 Must-Watch Tutorials to Build Your SaaS App in 2025
    In this tutorial, you’ll create a Next.js project with TailwindCSS and build custom authentication pages for Clerk without the watermark. This means you’ll create a custom Clerk authentication component, allowing you to have a UI without the Clerk branding in the authentication component. You’ll then set up file uploads using Uploadcare and create custom theming with Shadcn UI for light and dark modes. A real-time... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • PubNub vs Pusher creating a realtime messaging app in React
    When talking about general IM applications, having the ability to speak to someone in real-time opens up the door to so many unique possibilities. Our world has become ever more connected as a result of these newfound capabilities. In todays article we will learn all about messaging as we build a real-time messaging application. The application will be able to connect to two different real-time application... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • 10 Must-Use APIs for Your Next SaaS Project
    For real-time notifications, Pusher’s APIs allow you to implement in-app notifications, chat features, and collaboration tools easily. You can find it here. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • How to Build a Real-time Chat App with Laravel, Vue.js, and Pusher
    Pusher is a cloud-hosted service that makes adding real-time functionality to applications easy. It acts as a real-time communication layer between servers and clients. This allows your backend server to instantly broadcast new data via Pusher to your Vue.js client. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Show HN: Webhooked.email (2023)
    Feature request received! Pusher as in this thing -- https://pusher.com/ right? Any other places you want to push to? Slack? - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
View more

SocketCluster mentions (11)

  • You might not need WebSockets
    The problem with HTTP2 is that the server-push aspect was tacked on top of an existing protocol as an afterthought. Also, because HTTP is a resource transfer protocol, it adds a whole bunch of overheads like request and response headings which aren't always necessary but add to processing time. The primary purpose of HTTP2 was to allow servers to preemptively push files/resources to clients to avoid round-trip... - Source: Hacker News / 20 days ago
  • Exponential Rate Limiting
    For WebSockets, using SocketCluster (https://socketcluster.io), it's possible to queue up all requests from the same client and then detect and respond to high backpressure spikes (e.g. By disconnecting the client and/or recording the incident). You can combine different approaches like limiting the number of connections from a single IP within a certain timeframe and also limiting the backpressure. The ability to... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Ask HN: Why do message queue-based architectures seem less popular now?
    I never fully understood the need for back end message queues TBH. You can just poll the database or data store every few seconds and process tasks in batches... IMO, the 'real time' aspect was only ever useful for front end use cases for performance reasons since short polling every second with HTTP (with all its headers/overheads) is prohibitively expensive. Also, HTTP long polling introduces some architectural... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • The Sound of Software
    Recently, I added an AI-generated soundtrack to my open source project's home page https://socketcluster.io/ It seems unconventional at first but I distinctly remember about a decade ago when Adobe Flash was still broadly supported, many Flash websites had soundtracks. I think the reason why regular HTML websites didn't have them was because it was difficult to implement and internet was much slower so they had to... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Backpressure explained – the resisted flow of data through software
    I wrote an async/await stream library for JavaScript/Node.js which supports backpressure management. It's heavily tested and used as part of SocketCluster (pub/sub SDK) https://socketcluster.io/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Pusher and SocketCluster, you can also consider the following products

Socket.io - Realtime application framework (Node.JS server)

Firebase - Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications for mobile and web.

PubNub - PubNub is a real-time messaging system for web and mobile apps that can handle API for all platforms and push messages to any device anywhere in the world in a fraction of a second without having to worry about proxies, firewalls or mobile drop-offs.

SignalR - SignalR is a server-side software system designed for writing scalable Internet applications, notably web servers.

OneSignal - Customer engagement platform used by over 1 million developers and marketers; the fastest and most reliable way to send mobile and web push notifications, in-app messages, emails, and SMS.

Faye - Simple pub/sub messaging for the web