
Tango.us
Folge
MagicHow
UserGuiding
Guidejar
Pages by Scribe
iorad
Create step-by-step user guides, with a simple click

Arcade
Supademo
Navattic
Storylane.io
Tango.us
Floik
Guidejar
Record your web app once in Chrome and get an interactive demo and a step-by-step guide. Recorded pages stay editable, so a renamed button is an edit, not a new recording.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, ScribeHow seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 19 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | scribe.com | atriumkit.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of ScribeHow yet.
AtriumKit is an alternative to Arcade, Supademo and Storylane for interactive demos, and to Scribe and Tango for step-by-step guides, for teams that need both and are tired of recording again every time a label changes. Demo tools are built for marketing and documentation tools for support....
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of AtriumKit yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
No ScribeHow videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
AtriumKit: one click-through becomes a demo, a guide and a video
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing ScribeHow and AtriumKit.
AtriumKit's answer:
Choose AtriumKit if you need demos for sales and marketing and written guides for docs and support, and want both from the same recording. HTML capture, the step-by-step guide and the MCP server are on every plan, Free included, where some demo tools keep HTML capture for their top tiers. Viewers are always free, and Pro is $38 per creator a month, or $32 billed yearly. If you need desktop-app capture, custom domains or a SOC 2 report today, another tool may fit better, and our comparison pages at atriumkit.com/alternatives say where.
AtriumKit's answer:
One click-through of your web app in Chrome gives you both an interactive demo and a step-by-step guide with screenshots. Recorded pages are kept as HTML, so a renamed button, a new price or a customer's name on screen is an edit in the editor, not a new recording, and that works on the free plan. AtriumKit also runs an MCP server on every plan, so Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor can edit, translate and publish your demos.
AtriumKit's answer:
Software companies that want to show their product without a call: product marketers, sales and solutions engineers, customer success and support teams, technical writers and founders. It's priced so small teams can use it, with a free plan and free viewers on every plan.
AtriumKit's answer:
I've been building software for many years and have shipped a number of public-facing tools and apps. Every time, I wanted to show people the value of what I'd built without making them sign up first. Looking at other products, I noticed that the ones I actually signed up for were the ones I could see and touch before anyone asked me to create an account. The interactive demo tools out there had a lot of the right things, but the parts I cared about, like editing a captured page after recording, sat on plans priced for sales teams. So I built the version I wanted, for small teams: one click-through in Chrome gives you an interactive demo and a step-by-step guide, on the free plan.
Micah Shackelford, founder (the full story is at atriumkit.com/about)
AtriumKit's answer:
A Chrome MV3 extension (built with WXT) records each step's screenshot and an HTML snapshot of the page. The app, the demo player and storage run on Cloudflare Workers, D1 and R2, with a Vue front end. The video studio renders HTML compositions to MP4 in Cloudflare Containers, and the MCP server speaks Streamable HTTP with OAuth 2.1.
Share your experience with using ScribeHow and AtriumKit. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


This is awesome! What is your most common use case? Have you thought of competing with https://scribehow.com/ in the documentation space? - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Scribehow is a visual documentation platform built by the creators of Scribe, a screen recording and sharing tool. Scribehow allows you to create step-by-step guides, tutorials, how-tos, and other knowledge articles in an interactive and... - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
Scribe | Senior Software Engineer, Growth Engineer | React (Next.JS), Python | SF or Remote | https://scribehow.com Scribe is a product-led growth (PLG) startup based in San Francisco that is growing our team on the basis of user love... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Tracking AtriumKit since Nov 2026.
When comparing ScribeHow and AtriumKit, you can also consider the following products.

Tango instantly turns what you know into step-by-step guidance—no videos, meetings, or screen shares required.
Compare Tango.us to ScribeHow or AtriumKit:



Create beautifully interactive product demos and guides with AI.
Compare Supademo to ScribeHow or AtriumKit:

MagicHow is a free step-by-step guide creation tool for automatic process documentation and creating instructional documents like how-to guides, manuals, tutorials, and standard operating procedures (SOPs).
Compare MagicHow to ScribeHow or AtriumKit:
