Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Screenster VS Phantomjs

Compare Screenster VS Phantomjs and see what are their differences

Screenster

10x faster UI testing without a line of code.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Phantomjs

PhantomJS is a headless browser that works hand in hand with Selenium to help developers more efficiently test their sites and apps.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
DocRaptor
As the only API powered by the Prince HTML-to-PDF engine, DocRaptor provides the best support for complex PDFs with powerful support for headers, page breaks, page numbers, flexbox, watermarks, accessible PDFs, and much more sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Phantomjs seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 11 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 11
Website Testing popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
160 vs 234

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Screenster
Phantomjs
Website screenster.io phantomjs.org
Pricing
Official pricing
—
Listed in
Website Testing Browser Testing Automated Testing Software Testing +1
Development Tools Javascript UI Libraries JavaScript Framework UI +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Screenster 5 features
Phantomjs 5 features
  • Ease of Use
    Screenster offers a user-friendly interface that allows users to easily navigate and set up their automated tests without needing extensive coding knowledge.
  • Visual Regression Testing
    Screenster provides robust visual regression testing capabilities, allowing you to detect any visual changes in your web applications effectively.
  • Cloud-Based
    Because it's a cloud-based solution, Screenster does not require any complex local setup, contributing to ease of accessibility and reduced maintenance.
  • Team Collaboration
    Screenster provides features that enhance team collaboration, such as shared test projects and dashboards for team visibility.
  • Smart Comparison Algorithms
    It features smart algorithms to compare screenshots accurately, which helps in flagging only the meaningful changes and reducing false positives.

Possible disadvantages

  • Pricing
    Screenster can be relatively expensive compared to some other test automation tools, especially for smaller businesses or individual developers.
  • Limited Programming Language Support
    The platform may have limited support for various programming languages and integrations, confining more experienced developers who prefer custom scripting.
  • Dependency on Network
    Being a cloud-based solution means that it is highly dependent on network stability and speed, which might be a limitation in environments with poor connectivity.
  • Scalability
    As of the latest data, some users have reported that Screenster may not scale well for extremely large projects or enterprise-level testing requirements.
  • Learning Curve for Complex Scenarios
    While it's easy to use for basic tests, setting up complex testing scenarios can still have a learning curve, requiring additional time and effort to master.
  • Headless Execution
    PhantomJS can run scripts without the need for a graphical user interface, making it ideal for automation tasks such as web scraping and automated testing, especially in CI environments.
  • Full Web Stack
    It fully supports a range of web standards like DOM, CSS, JavaScript, and even SVG. This makes it highly versatile for different types of web interactions and manipulations.
  • Screenshots
    PhantomJS allows for easy capturing of web content as screenshots, which is useful for visual testing, performance analysis, and content verification.
  • Network Monitoring
    The tool offers capabilities for monitoring network traffic and performance, enabling developers to gather insights on resource loading times, HTTP status codes, and other networking metrics.
  • Simplicity
    PhantomJS provides a straightforward API, making it relatively easy to use and integrate into development and testing workflows even for developers with limited experience in scripting.

Possible disadvantages

  • Deprecated
    Active development of PhantomJS has been discontinued. This means no new features, improvements, or security updates will be released, which can pose significant risk for long-term projects.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running headless browsers can still be resource-intensive. PhantomJS may consume considerable CPU and memory, which could become a bottleneck in high-performance environments.
  • Limited Modern Web Compatibility
    As the web evolves, new standards and features are introduced. Being discontinued, PhantomJS may lack support for the latest web technologies, potentially leading to rendering discrepancies or failures.
  • Difficulty in Debugging
    Debugging headless browser scripts can be more challenging compared to using full browsers with developer tools, making it harder to resolve complex issues that arise.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    While the API is straightforward, mastering PhantomJS scripting and effectively dealing with asynchronous JavaScript operations and browser-specific quirks can be difficult for beginners.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Screenster
Phantomjs

Overall verdict

  • Screenster is considered a good tool for teams looking to streamline their UI testing processes without investing heavily in manual testing or complex scripting. Its features are particularly beneficial for teams that need a quick setup and straightforward operation.

Why this product is good

  • Screenster is a cloud-based visual regression testing tool aimed at simplifying UI testing processes. It automatically captures and monitors visual changes in the UI over time, reducing the effort required to manually spot differences. The platform is designed to be user-friendly, supporting no-code test creation, making it accessible to both technical and non-technical team members. It integrates with CI/CD pipelines and supports cross-browser testing.

Recommended for

    Screenster is recommended for small to medium-sized development teams, QAs, or businesses that want to implement efficient UI testing without extensive overhead. It's also suitable for teams that need frequent UI updates and want to ensure visual consistency across different browsers.

Overall verdict

  • As of now, PhantomJS is no longer actively maintained, and the developer community has largely transitioned to using more modern alternatives like headless versions of Chromium or Firefox, such as Puppeteer or Playwright. These alternatives offer better support, more features, and are actively maintained. Therefore, while PhantomJS was good in its time, it is generally not recommended for new projects.

Why this product is good

  • PhantomJS was once a popular headless browser for automating web page interaction and capturing screenshots, especially useful for testing and web scraping. It supports web standards such as DOM handling, CSS selector, JSON, Canvas, and SVG. Its main advantage was providing a fast and efficient way to run tests without needing a full graphical browser environment.

Recommended for

    PhantomJS may still be suitable for legacy projects where it has already been integrated, and the overhead of switching to a new tool would outweigh the benefits. However, for new projects or if you are revisiting an existing project for upgrades, it is recommended to consider more current tools like Puppeteer, Playwright, or Selenium.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Screenster 3 videos + Add
Phantomjs 2 videos + Add

Editing UI Tests with Screenster

More videos

  • - Toddy Screenster Hands-On Review
  • - Gmail visual testing automation with Screenster

How to use PhantomJS with Selenium?

More videos

  • - DrupalCon Portland 2013: AUTOMATED TESTING WITH JASMINE AND PHANTOMJS

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Screenster
Phantomjs
100% 100%
Website Testing
0% 0%
0% 0%
Development Tools
100% 100%
100% 100%
Browser Testing
0% 0%
0% 0%
Javascript UI Libraries
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Screenster and Phantomjs. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Screenster no reviews yet
Phantomjs no reviews yet

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Screenster 0 mentions
Phantomjs 11 mentions

Tracking Screenster since Mar 2021.

  • youtube bandwidth throttled for cloud addresses?
    Install Phantomjs and see if that improves things. Source: over 3 years ago
  • How to Bypass Cloudflare in 2023: The 8 Best Methods
    Automated Browser Detection. Cloudflare queries the browser for properties that only exist in automated web browser environments. For example, the existence of the window.document.__selenium_unwrapped or window.callPhantom property... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Ask HN: What's the best way to get all the HTML from a JavaScript site?
    I know there is https://phantomjs.org/ but is there something else people use these days? The issue is some websites curl works fine to get all the rendered html, but some you don't get any content without a javascript engine. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

View more

Alternatives to Screenster and Phantomjs

When comparing Screenster and Phantomjs, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...