Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

browserling VS Phantomjs

Compare browserling VS Phantomjs and see what are their differences

browserling

Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Phantomjs

PhantomJS is a headless browser that works hand in hand with Selenium to help developers more efficiently test their sites and apps.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
DocRaptor
As the only API powered by the Prince HTML-to-PDF engine, DocRaptor provides the best support for complex PDFs with powerful support for headers, page breaks, page numbers, flexbox, watermarks, accessible PDFs, and much more sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Phantomjs should be more popular than browserling. It has been mentioned 11 times since March 2021.

social mentions
6 vs 11
Website Testing popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
181 vs 234

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

browserling
Phantomjs
Website browserling.com phantomjs.org
Pricing
Official pricing
—
Listed in
Website Testing Browser Testing Automated Testing Software Testing +1
Development Tools Javascript UI Libraries JavaScript Framework UI +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

browserling 6 features
Phantomjs 5 features
  • Cross-Browser Testing
    Browserling allows you to test your website across multiple browsers and operating systems without the need for virtual machines or separate devices.
  • Live Interaction
    You can interact with the browsers in real-time, enabling you to test dynamic elements and user interactions easily.
  • No Installation
    The service is entirely web-based, meaning no installation or setup is required, which saves time and simplifies the process.
  • Security
    Browserling provides secure browsing sessions, ensuring that your data and testing environments remain safe.
  • Developer Tools
    Built-in developer tools allow you to debug and inspect code directly in the testing session.
  • Bookmarklets
    You can use bookmarklets provided by Browserling to quickly initiate tests directly from your browser.

Possible disadvantages

  • Session Limits
    Free accounts have limited session times, which can be restrictive for comprehensive testing.
  • Performance
    The performance and responsiveness can sometimes be slower compared to testing on a local machine.
  • Cost
    Advanced features and unlimited testing require a paid subscription, which might not be cost-effective for small teams or solo developers.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    Some advanced testing features, like automated screenshot comparisons or parallel testing, may be missing or less developed compared to competitors.
  • Browser and OS Availability
    While Browserling supports a wide range of browsers and operating systems, it may not cover all possible combinations needed for exhaustive testing.
  • Headless Execution
    PhantomJS can run scripts without the need for a graphical user interface, making it ideal for automation tasks such as web scraping and automated testing, especially in CI environments.
  • Full Web Stack
    It fully supports a range of web standards like DOM, CSS, JavaScript, and even SVG. This makes it highly versatile for different types of web interactions and manipulations.
  • Screenshots
    PhantomJS allows for easy capturing of web content as screenshots, which is useful for visual testing, performance analysis, and content verification.
  • Network Monitoring
    The tool offers capabilities for monitoring network traffic and performance, enabling developers to gather insights on resource loading times, HTTP status codes, and other networking metrics.
  • Simplicity
    PhantomJS provides a straightforward API, making it relatively easy to use and integrate into development and testing workflows even for developers with limited experience in scripting.

Possible disadvantages

  • Deprecated
    Active development of PhantomJS has been discontinued. This means no new features, improvements, or security updates will be released, which can pose significant risk for long-term projects.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running headless browsers can still be resource-intensive. PhantomJS may consume considerable CPU and memory, which could become a bottleneck in high-performance environments.
  • Limited Modern Web Compatibility
    As the web evolves, new standards and features are introduced. Being discontinued, PhantomJS may lack support for the latest web technologies, potentially leading to rendering discrepancies or failures.
  • Difficulty in Debugging
    Debugging headless browser scripts can be more challenging compared to using full browsers with developer tools, making it harder to resolve complex issues that arise.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    While the API is straightforward, mastering PhantomJS scripting and effectively dealing with asynchronous JavaScript operations and browser-specific quirks can be difficult for beginners.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

browserling
Phantomjs

Overall verdict

  • Browserling is generally considered a good tool for web developers and testers who need quick and easy access to multiple browsers on various operating systems. It simplifies the process of cross-browser testing and can save time and resources compared to setting up multiple virtual machines or devices.

Why this product is good

  • Browserling is a tool that allows users to quickly test their websites across different browsers in real time. It provides a cloud-based platform where you can run various browsers without needing to install them on your machine. This service is particularly useful for developers and testers who need to ensure cross-browser compatibility. Additionally, Browserling offers features like live interactive testing, screenshots, and responsive testing which can enhance productivity and efficiency in web development workflows.

Recommended for

  • Web developers
  • QA testers
  • UI/UX designers
  • Freelancers
  • Agencies
  • Anyone interested in testing websites across multiple browsers and operating systems

Overall verdict

  • As of now, PhantomJS is no longer actively maintained, and the developer community has largely transitioned to using more modern alternatives like headless versions of Chromium or Firefox, such as Puppeteer or Playwright. These alternatives offer better support, more features, and are actively maintained. Therefore, while PhantomJS was good in its time, it is generally not recommended for new projects.

Why this product is good

  • PhantomJS was once a popular headless browser for automating web page interaction and capturing screenshots, especially useful for testing and web scraping. It supports web standards such as DOM handling, CSS selector, JSON, Canvas, and SVG. Its main advantage was providing a fast and efficient way to run tests without needing a full graphical browser environment.

Recommended for

    PhantomJS may still be suitable for legacy projects where it has already been integrated, and the overhead of switching to a new tool would outweigh the benefits. However, for new projects or if you are revisiting an existing project for upgrades, it is recommended to consider more current tools like Puppeteer, Playwright, or Selenium.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

browserling 2 videos + Add
Phantomjs 2 videos + Add

LambdaTest vs Browserling - Browser Compatibility Testing Tools Reviews

More videos

  • - Browserling problem solved | WhatsApp on Jio phone | install WhatsApp on Jio phone

How to use PhantomJS with Selenium?

More videos

  • - DrupalCon Portland 2013: AUTOMATED TESTING WITH JASMINE AND PHANTOMJS

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
browserling
Phantomjs
100% 100%
Website Testing
0% 0%
0% 0%
Development Tools
100% 100%
100% 100%
Browser Testing
0% 0%
0% 0%
Javascript UI Libraries
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using browserling and Phantomjs. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

browserling no reviews yet
Phantomjs no reviews yet

We have no reviews of browserling yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

browserling 6 mentions
Phantomjs 11 mentions

View more

  • youtube bandwidth throttled for cloud addresses?
    Install Phantomjs and see if that improves things. Source: over 3 years ago
  • How to Bypass Cloudflare in 2023: The 8 Best Methods
    Automated Browser Detection. Cloudflare queries the browser for properties that only exist in automated web browser environments. For example, the existence of the window.document.__selenium_unwrapped or window.callPhantom property... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Ask HN: What's the best way to get all the HTML from a JavaScript site?
    I know there is https://phantomjs.org/ but is there something else people use these days? The issue is some websites curl works fine to get all the rendered html, but some you don't get any content without a javascript engine. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

View more

Alternatives to browserling and Phantomjs

When comparing browserling and Phantomjs, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...