RetryFi VS git-sizer

• Decline-code-aware dunning
  Soft declines get smart retries; hard declines skip straight to a "fix your card" email.
• Branded email sequence
  Four recovery emails sent under your name and logo — not Stripe's generic notices.
• One-click card update
  Customers fix the card via a secure Stripe-hosted link; RetryFi never handles card numbers.
• 90-day historical scan
  On connect, back-scans 90 days of failed invoices to show what you've already lost.
• Recovery dashboard
  Live view of revenue at risk, recovered this month, all-time recovered, and recovery rate.
• Stripe OAuth setup
  Connect in seconds — no code, no API keys. RetryFi only reads billing data and retries invoices.
• Runs alongside Stripe
  Complements Stripe's own retries instead of replacing them — one branded sequence, no duplicate emails.
• Slack notifications
  (Pro) Get pinged in Slack when payments fail and when they recover.
• Pricing
  Free up to 10 recoveries/mo · Pro $29 (50) · Scale $79 (200) — no cut of recovered revenue.

• Comprehensive Repository Analysis
  git-sizer analyzes many different dimensions of a Git repository including commit count, tree size, blob size, history depth, and reference counts, providing a holistic view of repository health and potential scaling issues.
• Easy to Use
  The tool is simple to run with minimal setup—just execute it within a git repository—and it produces clear, human-readable output that highlights potential problem areas without requiring complex configuration.
• Identifies Performance Bottlenecks
  It helps identify specific issues that could degrade Git performance, such as excessively large blobs, deep history, large trees, or too many references, which is valuable before migrating or scaling repositories.
• Open Source and Maintained by GitHub
  Being an official GitHub project, it benefits from credibility, community trust, and ongoing maintenance, and it is well documented with clear explanations of what each metric means.
• Useful for Pre-Migration Checks
  It's particularly helpful for teams migrating repositories to new platforms or consolidating repos, as it flags potential issues that could cause problems during migration or with hosting providers' limits.

Possible disadvantages

• No Automatic Remediation
  git-sizer only identifies and reports issues but does not offer any built-in tools or automated processes to fix problems like large blobs or excessive history depth—users must use separate tools like BFG Repo-Cleaner or git-filter-repo.
• Output Can Be Overwhelming for Beginners
  While detailed, the output includes many metrics and threshold levels that may be confusing for users unfamiliar with Git internals, requiring some learning curve to fully interpret results.
• Limited to Local Analysis
  The tool analyzes a local clone of the repository, so it requires users to have a full local copy of the repo (or at least enough history) to get accurate results, which can be time-consuming for very large repositories.
• No Real-Time Monitoring
  It functions as a one-time analysis tool rather than providing continuous or real-time monitoring of repository health, requiring manual reruns to track changes over time.
• Command-Line Only Interface
  The tool lacks a graphical user interface, which may be less accessible for users who prefer visual dashboards or are less comfortable with command-line tools.

RetryFi: Recover Failed Stripe Payments on Autopilot (demo)

No git-sizer videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Tracking RetryFi since Jun 2026.

• how to keep github repos small?

  Also there’s a cool project from GitHub you can use to help understand the size of git’s objects in your git repo https://github.com/github/git-sizer. This might help you determine what the best cloning strategy could be. Source: almost 5 years ago