Stunning VS git-sizer

• Customer Retention
  Stunning helps reduce churn by alerting customers when their payments fail, providing opportunities to update payment information promptly.
• Ease of Integration
  The platform offers easy integration with various payment processors like Stripe, making it seamless for businesses to set up and use.
• Automated Communications
  It automates communication with customers regarding payment issues, saving businesses time and ensuring consistency in outreach.
• Detailed Reporting
  Stunning provides detailed reports on failed payments and recovered revenue, aiding in financial analysis and strategy planning.
• Customization Options
  Businesses can customize notification templates to align with their branding and communication style, enhancing customer experience.

Possible disadvantages

• Cost
  Depending on the size of the business and volume of transactions, the cost of using Stunning may be a consideration, especially for startups or small enterprises.
• Complexity for Small Businesses
  For very small businesses with minimal payment issues, the features offered by Stunning might be more complex or extensive than needed.
• Dependency on Internet Connection
  As a cloud-based service, Stunning requires a reliable internet connection to function properly, which might be an issue in areas with poor connectivity.
• Limited to Web
  Businesses that rely solely on in-person transactions might find limited use for Stunning's primarily online-focused features.

• Comprehensive Repository Analysis
  git-sizer analyzes many different dimensions of a Git repository including commit count, tree size, blob size, history depth, and reference counts, providing a holistic view of repository health and potential scaling issues.
• Easy to Use
  The tool is simple to run with minimal setup—just execute it within a git repository—and it produces clear, human-readable output that highlights potential problem areas without requiring complex configuration.
• Identifies Performance Bottlenecks
  It helps identify specific issues that could degrade Git performance, such as excessively large blobs, deep history, large trees, or too many references, which is valuable before migrating or scaling repositories.
• Open Source and Maintained by GitHub
  Being an official GitHub project, it benefits from credibility, community trust, and ongoing maintenance, and it is well documented with clear explanations of what each metric means.
• Useful for Pre-Migration Checks
  It's particularly helpful for teams migrating repositories to new platforms or consolidating repos, as it flags potential issues that could cause problems during migration or with hosting providers' limits.

Possible disadvantages

• No Automatic Remediation
  git-sizer only identifies and reports issues but does not offer any built-in tools or automated processes to fix problems like large blobs or excessive history depth—users must use separate tools like BFG Repo-Cleaner or git-filter-repo.
• Output Can Be Overwhelming for Beginners
  While detailed, the output includes many metrics and threshold levels that may be confusing for users unfamiliar with Git internals, requiring some learning curve to fully interpret results.
• Limited to Local Analysis
  The tool analyzes a local clone of the repository, so it requires users to have a full local copy of the repo (or at least enough history) to get accurate results, which can be time-consuming for very large repositories.
• No Real-Time Monitoring
  It functions as a one-time analysis tool rather than providing continuous or real-time monitoring of repository health, requiring manual reruns to track changes over time.
• Command-Line Only Interface
  The tool lacks a graphical user interface, which may be less accessible for users who prefer visual dashboards or are less comfortable with command-line tools.

No analysis of Stunning yet.

Going In Style - "Instant Classic/Stunning Review" TV Spot

More videos

No git-sizer videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• Revova vs Churnkey, Churn Buster, Stunning & More (2026 Comparison)
  revova.io · Jul 2026

  Every tool here can recover failed payments; the question is fit. The incumbents — Churnkey, Paddle Retain, Churn Buster, Stunning, Baremetrics — are proven, and each has a scenario where it's the right call, which...

We have no reviews of git-sizer yet. Be the first one to post

• Launch HN: FlyCode (YC S22) – Stop losing revenue due to failed payments

  When should a B2B SaaS reach for FlyCode (an app on Stripe Marketplace) vs Stripe Dunning (I'm actually unsure if it's their own offering or not)? [1]: https://stunning.co/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

• Looking for a dunning software that integrates with Adyen

  I have used stunning.costunning . And if you are using stripe there is already existing a basic dunning followup. Source: over 5 years ago

• Stop making your paying customers hunt for the Sign In button on your website

  Their blog has no sign-in button. Their main page (https://stunning.co/) does. - Source: Hacker News / over 5 years ago

• how to keep github repos small?

  Also there’s a cool project from GitHub you can use to help understand the size of git’s objects in your git repo https://github.com/github/git-sizer. This might help you determine what the best cloning strategy could be. Source: almost 5 years ago