
RegDossier.eu
ComplianceAgent
SetAIComply
AI Act Directory
OneTrust
Vanta
ComplyAI by L Company
Free EU AI Act risk check for founders. Answer 32 questions about your AI product and get a personalised gap report: your risk tier, which Articles apply to your role, obligations with the correct post-Omnibus deadlines, and a prioritised fix list.

GitLab
BitBucket
VS Code
Git
Treehouse
Pantheon
CodePen
Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, GitHub seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2484 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | reglynn.eu | github.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | Startup from Poland · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 | Startup from the United States · 500 - 999 employees · 2008 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


Reglynn turns the EU AI Act into a decision you can act on. Most founders don't ignore the AI Act — they can't tell whether it applies to them. Finding out costs €300/hour, and free tools hand you a risk tier with no reasoning behind it. Reglynn asks 32 questions about what your AI system does,...
No description of GitHub yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of Reglynn.eu yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Reglynn.eu and GitHub.
Reglynn.eu's answer
Three things. It uses the correct post-Omnibus deadlines — most published guidance still carries the pre-June-2026 dates, which tells high-risk providers they're late when they aren't, and tells chatbot builders they have time when they don't. It runs the Article 6(3) exemption check, which almost no free tool does, so it won't tell you you're high-risk when the regulation says otherwise. And it publishes its own AI Act self-assessment, because Reglynn is an AI system under the regulation it assesses.
Reglynn.eu's answer
Free checkers give you a risk tier with no reasoning. Enterprise GRC platforms give you a subscription starting in the tens of thousands. A lawyer gives you an answer at €300/hour. Reglynn gives you a dated, structured document you can put in front of an enterprise procurement team — once, for €59.
It also works hard not to over-classify you. The report runs role, then GPAI, then the Article 6(3) exemption, then establishment, in that order, because assigning someone else's obligations to a deployer is what makes these tools useless.
Reglynn.eu's answer
Founders, product managers and operations leads at EU or EU-serving companies with 5–50 people who ship an AI feature — chatbots, generative products, scoring or ranking models, AI-assisted screening. Typically the trigger is an enterprise prospect's legal team asking for their AI Act position in writing, with a deadline attached. Not lawyers, and not enterprises with a compliance department.
Reglynn.eu's answer
After the June 2026 Omnibus, the coverage said "the EU delayed the AI Act." That's half true, and it's the reassuring half. High-risk obligations moved to December 2027 — but Article 50 transparency duties were never deferred, and regulators gained fining powers on 2 August 2026.
So the group with live obligations right now is precisely the group that read "delayed" and stopped paying attention. Reglynn was built to close that gap for companies that can't put €300/hour behind finding out.
Reglynn.eu's answer
A static site on Netlify. Assessment through structured forms, with report generation via Anthropic's Claude API against Reglynn's own question set and classification logic. Delivery logging in Airtable. Analytics via GA4 with Consent Mode v2, denied by default.
Reglynn.eu's answer
Reglynn launched in August 2026 and doesn't publish customer names. Buyers are typically 10–50 person AI companies responding to an enterprise procurement or due-diligence request.
Share your experience with using Reglynn.eu and GitHub. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of Reglynn.eu yet. Be the first one to post
GitHub is an essential platform for modern software development. It makes it easy to host, manage, and collaborate on code while providing powerful tools for version control, project management, and team...
GitHub Discussions is a communication forum for the community around an open source or internal project. Discussions enable fluid, open conversation in a public forum. Discussions are transparent and accessible, but...
However, like any (human) product, the platform has its limits, downsides, and critics. GitHub has been barred by certain governments, and even if that isn’t exactly the company’s fault, the users are the ones limited...
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking Reglynn.eu since Aug 2026.
For developers who cannot access Fable 5, Claude Opus 4.8 offers the best alternative. Integrating this model into your daily workflow is straightforward, especially when using modern development platforms like GitHub for repository... - Source: dev.to / 28 days ago
1228 push attempts died with fatal: could not read Username for 'https://github.com' — an https remote with no credential helper and no stored Credentials. First one 2026-07-21T20:48:03Z, still failing as I write this. Thirty-nine Days. - Source: dev.to / 12 days ago
They can include the protocol, it’s that regardless of what’s put in there it’ll use https, which is explained with examples both in the following sentences and then in more detail in a linked doc. > For repositories on GitHub, GitLab,... - Source: Hacker News / 15 days ago
When comparing Reglynn.eu and GitHub, you can also consider the following products.

Eight free EU compliance tools. NIS2 applicability, AI Act risk and fines, DORA assessment, deadline tracker. Article-level citations, no signup.
Compare RegDossier.eu to Reglynn.eu or GitHub:

Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab
Compare GitLab to Reglynn.eu or GitHub:

Free EU AI Act Article 50 Transparency Checker — five plain-language questions, instant deterministic result. No account, nothing stored.
Compare ComplianceAgent to Reglynn.eu or GitHub:

Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.
Compare BitBucket to Reglynn.eu or GitHub:

AI-Act-native compliance for European SMEs — classify AI systems, generate Annex IV docs, and stay compliant in 24 EU languages. Self-serve, from €0.
Compare SetAIComply to Reglynn.eu or GitHub:

Build and debug modern web and cloud applications, by Microsoft
Compare VS Code to Reglynn.eu or GitHub: