Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Quantive VS Commit Together by Github

Compare Quantive VS Commit Together by Github and see what are their differences

Quantive

The best platform for turning strategy into results.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium Free trial
Alternatives Is it good?
Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Grapple
Do-It-Yourself Data Analytics & Business Intelligence, Powered by AI sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Commit Together by Github seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 1
Goal Setting And OKRs popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
167 vs 68

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Quantive
Commit Together by Github
Website quantive.com github.blog
Pricing
Freemium Free trial Official pricing
—
Company 2018 —
Listed in
Employee Performance Management Goal Setting And OKRs Project Management HR +1
Developer Tools Productivity Coding Crypto +1

About Quantive and Commit Together by Github

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Quantive
Commit Together by Github

Quantive is the world’s leading Strategy Execution Platform based on the OKR management methodology. By embedding strategic context, priorities, and progress into the day-to-day, Quantive creates organizations that excel at execution. With over 2,000 global customers across enterprises,...

Read more about Quantive

No description of Commit Together by Github yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Quantive 7 features
Commit Together by Github 4 features
  • OKR Management
  • Whiteboards
  • KPIs
  • Check-Ins
  • Tasks & Projects
  • Insight Boards
  • 160+ Integrations
  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Quantive 2 videos + Add
Commit Together by Github 0 videos + Add

Gtmhub Demo for TBG

More videos

  • - Gtmhub 101

No Commit Together by Github videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Quantive
Commit Together by Github
100% 100%
Goal Setting And OKRs
0% 0%
0% 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100%
100% 100%
Project Management
0% 0%
0% 0%
Productivity
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Quantive and Commit Together by Github. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Quantive no reviews yet
Commit Together by Github no reviews yet

We have no reviews of Commit Together by Github yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Quantive 0 mentions
Commit Together by Github 1 mention

Tracking Quantive since Mar 2021.

  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago

Alternatives to Quantive and Commit Together by Github

When comparing Quantive and Commit Together by Github, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...