Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Private Packagist VS Open-Registry

Compare Private Packagist VS Open-Registry and see what are their differences

Private Packagist logo Private Packagist

Composer package archive as a service for PHP

Open-Registry logo Open-Registry

JavaScript Package Registry funded, developed and maintained by the community, for the community
  • Private Packagist Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-22
  • Open-Registry Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-03-31

Private Packagist features and specs

  • Centralized Package Management
    Private Packagist offers a centralized platform to manage PHP dependencies, making it easier for organizations to control the distribution and versioning of their internal libraries and third-party packages.
  • Security
    By using Private Packagist, organizations can ensure that their packages are coming from a secure and trusted source, reducing the risk of using malicious or compromised packages from public repositories.
  • Access Control
    It allows users to assign access rights and roles to team members, which helps maintain security and ensures that only authorized personnel can manage and access specific packages.
  • Custom Domains
    Organizations can use custom domains for their private packages, helping in maintaining brand identity and allowing for easier package management within the company's ecosystem.
  • Integrated with Composer
    Private Packagist is natively integrated with Composer, the PHP dependency manager, ensuring seamless adoption and easy integration into existing workflows.

Possible disadvantages of Private Packagist

  • Cost
    Private Packagist is a paid service, which might not be ideal for smaller organizations or individual developers who have tight budget constraints.
  • Dependency on External Service
    Relying on a third-party service for package management means that any downtime or service interruptions could potentially impact development workflows.
  • Complex Setup
    Compared to using the default Composer setup, configuring and managing an additional platform might incur some initial complexity and a learning curve for development teams.
  • Limited to PHP
    Being a PHP-focused service, it is not suitable for projects that require management of dependencies for multiple programming languages outside the PHP ecosystem.

Open-Registry features and specs

  • Decentralization
    Open-Registry leverages decentralized technologies, which can increase reliability and reduce the single points of failure typically seen in centralized systems.
  • Cost Efficiency
    By decentralizing package management, Open-Registry potentially reduces costs associated with maintaining central servers and infrastructure.
  • Security
    The decentralized nature of the registry can enhance security by reducing the risk of malicious tampering through centralized servers.
  • Community Driven
    Open-Registry is often driven by community contributions and development, encouraging more democratic and inclusive project evolution.

Possible disadvantages of Open-Registry

  • Adoption
    Being a newer system, Open-Registry might struggle with wide adoption, as developers and organizations are often slow to move away from established tools.
  • Compatibility
    Compatibility issues may arise, as legacy systems and tools are typically tailored to existing registries like npm, making integration potentially cumbersome.
  • Maturity
    As a relatively newer project, Open-Registry may not yet have the robustness and maturity features of long-established registries.
  • Support
    Open-Registry may have limited support resources compared to more established registry services, which could be a challenge for troubleshooting and help.

Private Packagist videos

Interview - Private Packagist Nils Adermann, Mathias Schreiber

Open-Registry videos

No Open-Registry videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Private Packagist and Open-Registry)
Package Manager
46 46%
54% 54
Front End Package Manager
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Software Development
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Private Packagist and Open-Registry. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Private Packagist seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Private Packagist mentions (7)

  • Private Packagist - has anyone used and can tell me if it might fit in my scenario?
    I was told in another forum to look at Private Packagist... But how is that different? Instead of installing packages from packagist.org.. You pay to Packagist.com to do the same thing? You just download from packagist.com cloud instead of packagist.org? Source: about 3 years ago
  • Need a secured way to be able to use Composer
    We have a private Satis instance. Our ITSec team reviews all packages before we add them to Satis. Packagist.com is available for us but the CI-CD servers can reach only the private Satis. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Need a secured way to be able to use Composer
    Https://packagist.com maybe tell them about a local packagist install. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Need a secured way to be able to use Composer
    "[MANAGER] requested this to be done in PHP. You as IT will know that most modern programming and scripting languages work only with packaging software properly. Composer sends requests (majority of cases) to packagist.com and to github.com. It will add thousands of hours to do everything that composer does manually. Please sign here to authorize the usage of 4000 hours and the possible delay of 4000 hours.... Source: about 3 years ago
  • What do you think of SaaS Frameworks?
    Another downside that only really exists with non-PHP boilerplates is getting updates isn'T as easy. With PHP we're able to use packagist.com and make our code available via composer. Other languages don't have this so SaaS Pegasus provides zip downloads and Gravity provides access to a GitHub repo. This means you have to apply bug fixes yourself. With Parthenon, you do composer update and you'll get the latest... Source: over 3 years ago
View more

Open-Registry mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Open-Registry yet. Tracking of Open-Registry recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Private Packagist and Open-Registry, you can also consider the following products

Satis - Satis is a simple static Composer repository generator

JSR - Open-source package registry supports TypeScript and distributes as ECMAScript modules, works with all JS runtimes like Node.

Sonatype Nexus Repository - The world's only repository manager with FREE support for popular formats.

Synaptic - Please take a minute to watch our video, it gives an overview of Synaptic's role in financial services.

Packagist - The PHP Package Repository

GNOME Software - A application for installing apps and updates.