Satis VS Open-Registry

Compare Satis VS Open-Registry and see what are their differences

IsDown.app

Monitor all your cloud services with our status page aggregator. IT teams choose IsDown to monitor all their vendors and get alerts whenever an outage occurs. Integration with Datadog, PagerDuty, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and a lot more. featured

This page does not exist

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

Satis

Satis is a simple static Composer repository generator

Open-Registry

JavaScript Package Registry funded, developed and maintained by the community, for the community

Landing page //
2023-07-11

Landing page //
2020-03-31

Satis

Website: github.com
$ Details

Edit details

Open-Registry

Website: open-registry.dev
$ Details: -

Edit details

Satis features and specs

Custom Repository Creation
Satis allows you to create your own Composer repositories, which can host private or customized packages. This is useful for internal company projects or any situation where you want more control over the packages you use.
Simple Setup
Satis is relatively straightforward to set up and requires minimal configuration. This simplicity makes it accessible for teams without a dedicated DevOps department.
Lightweight
Being a simple PHP static file generator, Satis is lightweight and doesn’t require a large resource overhead to operate, making it efficient for smaller projects or limited server environments.
Secure Private Packages
Satis allows for the secure hosting of private packages, ensuring that internal or proprietary code is not exposed to the public and can be shared safely within an organization.
Composer Compatibility
Satis is fully compatible with Composer, ensuring that developers can seamlessly integrate it into their existing workflow without requiring significant changes or adaptations.

Possible disadvantages of Satis

Limited Feature Set
Satis is primarily a static file generator and does not offer advanced features such as package search, browsing, or user interfaces that more robust solutions might provide.
Manual Updates
Packages hosted on a Satis repository do not update automatically; it requires manual intervention to update the package listings whenever changes are made to the source packages.
No Dependency Management
Satis itself does not handle dependency management; it relies on Composer for that functionality. Satis is only for repository management, which might not suit all project needs.
Limited Scalability
While lightweight, Satis might not be ideal for large-scale operations or gigantic repositories with many dependencies and packages, as it doesn't inherently support scaling or load balancing mechanisms.
Lack of User Management
Satis does not offer built-in user management functionality, which means that any access restrictions or permissions need to be handled externally, potentially complicating integration with other systems.

Open-Registry features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Satis videos

+ Add

2002 Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6 Initiale Road Test & Review - Matty's Cars

Open-Registry videos

No Open-Registry videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Satis and Open-Registry)

Satis

Open-Registry

Package Manager

78 78%

Package Manager

22% 22

Front End Package Manager

0 0%

Front End Package Manager

100% 100

Software Development

100 100%

Software Development

0% 0

Code Collaboration

44 44%

Code Collaboration

56% 56

User comments

Share your experience with using Satis and Open-Registry. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Satis seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Satis mentions (5)

Need help with Installing Enlightn Pro
Note: Satis is a local repo repository — the pro code is likely not on github. They set up their own system to handle these repositories outside of github/packagist. Source: over 2 years ago
Private Packagist - has anyone used and can tell me if it might fit in my scenario?
If you want/need to self-host this internally, you can look at satis to create and self-host a repository. Since you need to add the packages manually, your security team can vet the code before adding it. There is a post on gitconnected on how to set this up: https://levelup.gitconnected.com/how-to-host-your-own-private-packagist-for-free-or-extremely-cheap-faf44eca3647. Source: almost 3 years ago
Need a secured way to be able to use Composer
We have a private Satis instance. Our ITSec team reviews all packages before we add them to Satis. Packagist.com is available for us but the CI-CD servers can reach only the private Satis. Source: almost 3 years ago
My own CMS/Tool - what is the best way to go about the usage in different projects?
My team and I use Satis to accomplish that. It's hosted on our servers and we can easily release new versions. Dependabot can even upgrade the dependencies if new ones are detected. Source: almost 3 years ago
Do you use a private composer registry ? (Why / Why Not)
Composer supports multiple types of custom respositories, so you can host your own repository (with something like Satis), pay for a packagist.com private repository or even use a VCS repository to fetch packages directly from your private GIT repos. Source: over 3 years ago